We investigate the following fourth-order four-point nonhomogeneous Sturm-Liouville
boundary value problem:
,
,
, where
and
are nonnegative parameters. Some sufficient conditions are given for the existence
and uniqueness of a positive solution. The dependence of the solution on the parameters
is also studied.
1. Introduction
Boundary value problems (BVPs for short) consisting of fourth-order differential equation and four-point homogeneous boundary conditions have received much attention due to their striking applications. For example, Chen et al. [1] studied the fourth-order nonlinear differential equation
(11)with the four-point homogeneous boundary conditions
(12)
(13)where
. By means of the upper and lower solution method and Schauder fixed point theorem,
some criteria on the existence of positive solutions to the BVP (1.1)–(1.3) were established.
Bai et al. [2] obtained the existence of solutions for the BVP (1.1)–(1.3) by using a nonlinear
alternative of Leray-Schauder type. For other related results, one can refer to [3–5] and the references therein.
Recently, nonhomogeneous BVPs have attracted many authors' attention. For instance, Ma [6, 7] and L. Kong and Q. Kong [8–10] studied some second-order multipoint nonhomogeneous BVPs. In particular, L. Kong and Q. Kong [10] considered the following second-order BVP with multipoint nonhomogeneous boundary conditions
(14)where
and
are nonnegative parameters. They derived some conditions for the above BVP to have
a unique solution and then studied the dependence of this solution on the parameters
and
. Sun [11] discussed the existence and nonexistence of positive solutions to a class of third-order
three-point nonhomogeneous BVP. The authors in [12] studied the multiplicity of positive solutions for some fourth-order two-point nonhomogeneous
BVP by using a fixed point theorem of cone expansion/compression type. For more recent
results on higher-order BVPs with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions, one can see
[13–16].
Inspired greatly by the above-mentioned excellent works, in this paper we are concerned with the following Sturm-Liouville BVP consisting of the fourth-order differential equation:
(15)and the four-point nonhomogeneous boundary conditions
(16)
(17)where
and
are nonnegative parameters. Under the following assumptions:
(A1)
and
are nonnegative constants with
,
,
,
,
and 
(A2)
is continuous and monotone increasing in
for every
;
(A3)there exists
such that
(18)we prove the uniqueness of positive solution for the BVP (1.5)–(1.7) and study the
dependence of this solution on the parameters
.
2. Preliminary Lemmas
First, we recall some fundamental definitions.
Definition 2.1.
Let
be a Banach space with norm
. Then
(1)a nonempty closed convex set
is said to be a cone if
for all
and
, where
is the zero element of 
(2)every cone
in
defines a partial ordering in
by 
(3)a cone
is said to be normal if there exists
such that
implies that 

(4)a cone
is said to be solid if the interior
of
is nonempty.
Definition 2.2.
Let
be a solid cone in a real Banach space
an operator, and
Then
is called a
-concave operator if
(21)Next, we state a fixed point theorem, which is our main tool.
Lemma 2.3 (see [17]).
Assume that
is a normal solid cone in a real Banach space
and
is a
-concave increasing operator. Then
has a unique fixed point in 
The following two lemmas are crucial to our main results.
Lemma 2.4.
Assume that
and
are defined as in (A1) and
. Then for any
the BVP consisting of the equation
(22)and the boundary conditions (1.6) and (1.7) has a unique solution
(23)where
(24)Proof.
Let
(25)Then
(26)By (2.5) and (1.6), we know that
(27)On the other hand, in view of (2.5) and (1.7), we have
(28)So, it follows from (2.6) and (2.8) that
(29)which together with (2.7) implies that
(210)Lemma 2.5.
Assume that (A1) holds. Then
(1)
for 
(2)
for 
(3)
for 
3. Main Result
For convenience, we denote
and
. In the remainder of this paper, the following notations will be used:
(1)
if at least one of
approaches
;
(2)
if
for
;
(3)
if
for
and at least one of them is strict.
Let
. Then
is a Banach space, where
is defined as usual by the sup norm.
Our main result is the following theorem.
Theorem 3.1.
Assume that (A1)–(A3) hold. Then the BVP (1.5)–(1.7) has a unique positive solution
for any
, where
. Furthermore, such a solution
satisfies the following properties:
(P1)
(P2)
is strictly increasing in
, that is,
(31)(P3)
is continuous in
, that is, for any given 
(32)Proof.
Let
. Then
is a normal solid cone in
with
For any
, if we define an operator
as follows:
(33)then it is not difficult to verify that
is a positive solution of the BVP (1.5)–(1.7) if and only if
is a fixed point of
.
Now, we will prove that
has a unique fixed point by using Lemma 2.3.
First, in view of Lemma 2.5, we know that 
Next, we claim that
is a
-concave operator.
In fact, for any
and
it follows from (3.3) and (A3) that
(34)which shows that
is
-concave.
Finally, we assert that
is an increasing operator.
Suppose that
and
By (3.3) and (A2), we have
(35)which indicates that
is increasing.
Therefore, it follows from Lemma 2.3 that
has a unique fixed point
which is the unique positive solution of the BVP (1.5)–(1.7). The first part of the
theorem is proved.
In the rest of the proof, we will prove that such a positive solution
satisfies properties (P1), (P2), and (P3).
First,
(36)which together with
for
implies (P1).
Next, we show (P2). Assume that
Let
(37)Then
for
We assert that
Suppose on the contrary that
Since
is a
-concave increasing operator and for given
,
is strictly increasing in
, we have
(38)which contradicts the definition of
Thus, we get
for
And so,
(39)which indicates that
is strictly increasing in
.
Finally, we prove (P3). For any given
we first suppose that
with
From (P2), we know that
(310)Let
(311)Then
and
for
If we define
(312)then
and
(313)which together with the definition of
implies that
(314)So,
(315)Therefore,
(316)In view of (3.10) and (3.16), we obtain that
(317)which together with the fact that
as
shows that
(318)Similarly, we can also prove that
(319)Hence, (P3) holds.
Acknowledgment
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10801068).
References
-
Chen, S, Ni, W, Wang, C: Positive solution of fourth order ordinary differential equation with four-point boundary conditions. Applied Mathematics Letters. 19(2), 161–168 (2006). Publisher Full Text
-
Bai, C, Yang, D, Zhu, H: Existence of solutions for fourth order differential equation with four-point boundary conditions. Applied Mathematics Letters. 20(11), 1131–1136 (2007). Publisher Full Text
-
Graef, JR, Yang, B: Positive solutions of a nonlinear fourth order boundary value problem. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis. 14(1), 61–73 (2007)
-
Wu, H, Zhang, J: Positive solutions of higher-order four-point boundary value problem with
-Laplacian operator. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 233(11), 2757–2766 (2010). Publisher Full Text -
Zhao, J, Ge, W: Positive solutions for a higher-order four-point boundary value problem with a
-Laplacian. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 58(6), 1103–1112 (2009). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text -
Ma, R: Positive solutions for second-order three-point boundary value problems. Applied Mathematics Letters. 14(1), 1–5 (2001). Publisher Full Text
-
Ma, R: Positive solutions for nonhomogeneous
-point boundary value problems. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 47(4-5), 689–698 (2004). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text -
Kong, L, Kong, Q: Second-order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. I. Mathematische Nachrichten. 278(1-2), 173–193 (2005). Publisher Full Text
-
Kong, L, Kong, Q: Second-order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. II. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 330(2), 1393–1411 (2007). Publisher Full Text
-
Kong, L, Kong, Q: Uniqueness and parameter dependence of solutions of second-order boundary value problems. Applied Mathematics Letters. 22(11), 1633–1638 (2009). Publisher Full Text
-
Sun, Y: Positive solutions for third-order three-point nonhomogeneous boundary value problems. Applied Mathematics Letters. 22(1), 45–51 (2009). Publisher Full Text
-
do Ó, JM, Lorca, S, Ubilla, P: Multiplicity of solutions for a class of non-homogeneous fourth-order boundary value problems. Applied Mathematics Letters. 21(3), 279–286 (2008). Publisher Full Text
-
Graef, JR, Kong, L, Kong, Q, Wong, JSW: Higher order multi-point boundary value problems with sign-changing nonlinearities and nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations. 2010(28), 1–40 (2010)
-
Kong, L, Kong, Q: Higher order boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications. 72(1), 240–261 (2010). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
-
Kong, L, Piao, D, Wang, L: Positive solutions for third order boundary value problems with
-Laplacian. Results in Mathematics. 55(1-2), 111–128 (2009). Publisher Full Text -
Kong, L, Wong, JSW: Positive solutions for higher order multi-point boundary value problems with nonhomogeneous boundary conditions. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications. 367(2), 588–611 (2010). Publisher Full Text
-
Guo, DJ, Lakshmikantham, V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, Notes and Reports in Mathematics in Science and Engineering,p. viii+275. Academic Press, Boston, Mass, USA (1988)




