Skip to main content

Uniqueness of the potential function for the vectorial Sturm-Liouville equation on a finite interval

Abstract

In this paper, the vectorial Sturm-Liouville operator L Q =- d 2 d x 2 +Q ( x ) is considered, where Q(x) is an integrable m × m matrix-valued function defined on the interval [0,π] The authors prove that m2+1 characteristic functions can determine the potential function of a vectorial Sturm-Liouville operator uniquely. In particular, if Q(x) is real symmetric, then m ( m + 1 ) 2 +1 characteristic functions can determine the potential function uniquely. Moreover, if only the spectral data of self-adjoint problems are considered, then m2 + 1 spectral data can determine Q(x) uniquely.

1. Introduction

The study on inverse spectral problems for the vectorial Sturm-Liouville differential equation

y + ( λ I m - Q ( x ) ) y = 0 , 0 < x < π ,
(1.1)

on a finite interval is devoted to determine the potential matrix Q(x) from the spectral data of (1.1) with boundary conditions

U ( y ) : = y ( 0 ) - h y ( 0 ) = 0 , V ( y ) : = y ( π ) + H y ( π ) = 0 ,
(1.2)

where λ is the spectral parameter, h= [ h i j ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ and H= [ H i j ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ are in M n ( ) and Q ( x ) = [ Q i j ( x ) ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ is an integrable matrix-valued function. We use L m = L(Q, h, H) to denote the boundary problem (1.1)-(1.2). For the case m = 1, (1.1)-(1.2) is a scalar Sturm-Liouville equation. The scalar Sturm-Liouville equation often arises from some physical problems, for example, vibration of a string, quantum mechanics and geophysics. Numerous research results for this case have been established by renowned mathematicians, notably Borg, Gelfand, Hochstadt, Krein, Levinson, Levitan, Marchenko, Gesztesy, Simon and their coauthors and followers (see [19] and references therein). For the case m ≥ 2, some interesting results had been obtained (see [1020]). In particular, for m = 2 and Q(x) is a two-by-two real symmetric matrix-valued smooth functions defined in the interval [0, π] Shen [18] showed that five spectral data can determine Q(x) uniquely. More precisely speaking, he considered the inverse spectral problems of the vectorial Sturm-Liouville equation:

y + ( λ I 2 - Q 2 ( x ) ) y ( x ) = 0 , 0 < x < π ,
(1.3)

where Q2(x) is a real symmetric matrix-valued function defined in the interval [0, π]. Let σ D (Q) denotes the Dirichlet spectrum of (1.3), σ ND (Q) the Neumann-Dirichlet spectrum of (1.3) and σ j (Q) the spectrum of (1.3) with boundary condition

y ( 0 ) - B j y ( 0 ) = y ( π ) = 0 ,
(1.4)

for j = 1, 2, 3, where

B j = α j β j β j γ j

is a real symmetric matrix and {(α j , β j , γ j ,), j = 1, 2, 3} is linearly independent over . Then

Theorem 1.1 ([18], Theorem 4.1). Let Q2(x) and Q ̃ 2 ( x ) be two continuous two-by-two real symmetric matrix-valued functions defined on[0, π]. Suppose that σ D ( Q ) = σ D ( Q ̃ ) , σ N D ( Q ̃ ) = σ N D ( Q ̃ ) and σ j ( Q ) = σ j ( Q ̃ ) for j = 1, 2, 3, then Q ( x ) = Q ̃ ( x ) on[0, π].

The purpose of this paper is to generalize the above theorem for the case m ≥ 3. The idea we use is the Weyl's matrix for matrix-valued Sturm-Liouville equation

Y + ( λ I m - Q ( x ) ) Y = 0 , 0 < x < π .
(1.5)

Some uniqueness theorems for vectorial Sturm-Liouville equation are obtained in the last section.

2. Main Results

Let C ( x , λ ) = [ C i j ( x , λ ) ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ and S ( x , λ ) = [ S i j ( x , λ ) ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ be two solutions of equation (1.5) which satisfy the initial conditions

C ( 0 , λ ) = S ( 0 , λ ) = I m , C ( 0 , λ ) = S ( 0 , λ ) = 0 m ,

where 0 m is the m × m zero matrix, I m = [ δ i j ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ is the m × m identity matrix and δ ij is the Kronecker symbol. For given complex-valued matrices h and H, we denote

φ ( x , λ ) = φ i j ( x , λ ) i , j = 1 , m ¯ and Φ ( x , λ ) = Φ i j ( x , λ ) i , j = 1 , m ¯

be two solutions of equation (1.5) so that φ(x, λ) = C(x, λ) + S(x, λ)h and Φ ( x , λ ) =S ( x , λ ) +φ ( x , λ ) M ( λ ) which satisfy the boundary conditions

U ( Φ ) = Φ ( 0 ) - h Φ ( 0 ) = I m , V ( Φ ) = Φ ( π ) + H Φ ( π ) = 0 m .
(2.1)

Then, M ( λ ) =Φ ( 0 , λ ) . The matrix M ( λ ) = [ M i j ( λ ) ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ is called the Weyl matrix for L m (Q, h, H). In 2006, Yurko proved that:

Theorem 2.1 ([20], Theorem 1). Let M ( λ ) and M ̃ ( λ ) denote Weyl matrices of the problems L m (Q, h, H) and L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) separately. SupposeM ( λ ) = M ̃ ( λ ) , thenQ ( x ) = Q ̃ ( x ) , h= h ̃ andH= H ̃ .

Also note that from [20], we have

Φ ( x , λ ) = S ( x , λ ) + φ ( x , λ ) M ( λ ) = ψ ( x , λ ) ( U ( ψ ) ) - 1 ,
(2.2)
M ( λ ) = - ( V ( φ ) ) - 1 V ( S ) = ψ ( 0 , λ ) ( U ( ψ ) ) - 1
(2.3)

where ψ ( x , λ ) = [ ψ i j ( x , λ ) ] i , j = 1 , m ¯ is a matrix solution of equation (1.5) associated with the conditions ψ(π, λ) = I m and ψ' (π, λ) = -H. It is not difficult to see that both Φ(x, λ) and M ( λ ) are meromorphic in λ and the poles of M ( λ ) are coincided with the eigenvalues of L m (Q, h, H). Moreover, we have

M ( λ ) = - ( V ( φ ) ) - 1 V ( S ) = - Adj ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) det ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) ( S ( π , λ ) + H S ( π , λ ) ) ,

where Adj(A) denotes the adjoint matrix of A and det(A) denotes the determinant of A. In the remaining of this section, we shall prove some uniqueness theorems for vectorial Sturm-Liouville equations. Let B ( i , j ) = b r s r , s = 1 , m ¯ ,

b r s = 0 , ( r , s ) ( i , j ) , 1 , ( r , s ) = ( i , j ) , 1 i , j m ,

and B(0, 0) = 0 m The characteristic function for this boundary value problem L m (Q, h + B(i, j), H) is

Δ i j ( λ ) = det ( V ( φ + S B ( i , j ) ) ) , 1 i , j m or ( i , j ) = ( 0 , 0 ) .
(2.4)

The first problem we want to study is as following:

Problem 1. How many Δ ij (λ) can uniquely determine Q, h and H? where (i, j) = (0, 0) or 1 ≤ i, jm

To find the solution of Problem 1, we start with the following lemma

Lemma 2.2. Let B(i, j) = [b rs ]m×mand Δ ij be defined as above. Then

Δ i j ( λ ) = Δ 00 ( λ ) + det ( A u g m e n t [ φ 1 ( π , λ ) + H φ 1 ( π , λ ) , , S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) ( j t h c o l u m n ) , , φ m ( π , λ ) + H φ m ( π , λ ) ] ) ,

where φ k (π, λ) is the kth column of φ (π, λ) and S k (π, λ) the kth column of S (π, λ) for k = 1, 2, 3, ..., m.

Proof. Let

Y ( x , λ ) = [ C ( x , λ ) + S ( x , λ ) ( h + B ( i , j ) ) ] = [ ( C ( x , λ ) + S ( x , λ ) h ) + S ( x , λ ) B ( i , j ) ] = [ φ ( x , λ ) + S ( x , λ ) B ( i , j ) ]

Then

Δ i j ( λ ) = det ( Y ( π , λ ) + H Y ( π , λ ) ) = det ( ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) + ( S ( π , λ ) + H S ( π , λ ) B ( i , j ) ) = det ( ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) + [ 0 , S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) 0 ] ) ( j th column ) = det ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) + det ( φ 1 ( π , λ ) + H φ 1 ( π , λ ) , , S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) ( j th column ) , , φ m ( π , λ ) + H φ m ( π , λ ) ) = Δ 00 ( λ ) + det ( φ m ( π , λ ) + H φ 1 ( π , λ ) , , S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) ( j th column ) , , φ m ( π , λ ) + H φ m ( π , λ ) ) .

Next, we shall prove the first main theorem. For simplicity, if a symbol α denotes an object related to L m (Q, h, H), then the symbol α ̃ denotes the analogous object related to L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) .

Theorem 2.3. Suppose that Δ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) for(i, j) = (0, 0) or 1 ≤ i, jm then Q= Q ̃ , h= h ̃ andH= H ̃ .

Proof. Since

0 m = Φ ( π , λ ) + H Φ ( π , λ )

and

Φ ( x , λ ) = S ( x , λ ) + φ ( x , λ ) M ( λ ) ,

we have that

- ( S ( π , λ ) + H S ( π , λ ) ) e i = ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) M ( λ ) e i

for each i = 1, ..., m, that is,

- ( S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) ) = ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) M i ( λ ) .

By Crammer's rule,

M j i ( λ ) = det ( φ 1 ( π , λ ) + H φ 1 ( π , λ ) , , S i ( π , λ ) + H S i ( π , λ ) ( j th column ) , , φ m ( π , λ ) + H φ m ( π , λ ) ) det ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) = Δ 00 ( λ ) Δ i j ( λ ) Δ 00 ( λ ) = Δ ˜ 00 ( λ ) Δ ˜ i j ( λ ) Δ ˜ 00 ( λ ) = M ˜ j i ( λ ) for 1 i , j m .

Applying Theorem 2.1, we conclude that Q= Q ̃ , h= h ̃ and H= H ̃ . □

Lemma 2.4. Suppose that h, H are real symmetric matrices and Q(x) is a real symmetric matrix-valued function. Then, M ( λ ) =-V ( φ ) - 1 V ( S ) is real symmetric for all λ .

Proof. Let

U ( x , λ ) = φ ( x , λ ) S ( x , λ ) φ ( x , λ ) S ( x , λ ) .
(2.5)

For λ ,

( S * φ - S * φ ) ( x , λ ) = ( S * φ - S * φ ) ( 0 , λ ) = I m , ( S * S - S * S ) ( x , λ ) = ( S * S - S * S ) ( 0 , λ ) = 0 m , ( φ * φ - φ * φ ) ( x , λ ) = ( φ * φ - φ * φ ) ( 0 , λ ) = 0 m , ( φ * S - φ * S ) ( x , λ ) = ( φ * S - φ * S ) ( 0 , λ ) = I m ,

This leads to

U - 1 ( x , λ ) = - ( S ) * ( x , λ ) ( S * ) ( x , λ ) φ * ( x , λ ) - ( φ * ) ( x , λ ) .
(2.6)

Now let

U 2 ( x , λ ) = I m H 0 I m U ( x , λ ) .

Then

U 2 ( 1 , λ ) = I m H 0 I m U ( 1 , λ ) = V ( φ ) V ( S ) φ ( 1 , λ ) S ( 1 , λ )

and

U 2 1 ( 1 , λ ) = ( [ I m H 0 I m ] U ( 1 , λ ) ) 1 = [ S ( 1 ; λ ) [ V ( S ) ] ( φ ) ( 1 , λ ) [ V ( φ ) ] ] .

Since

U ( x , λ ) U - 1 ( x , λ ) = I 2 m ,

we have

V ( φ ) [ V ( S ) ] * = V ( S ) [ V ( φ ) ] * ,

i.e., M ( λ ) =V ( φ ) - 1 V ( S ) is real symmetric for all λ . □

Definition 2.1. We call L m (h, H, Q) a real symmetric problem if h, H are real symmetric matrices and Q(x) is a real symmetric matrix-valued function.

Corollary 2.5. Let L m (h, H, Q) andL ( h ̃ , H ̃ , Q ̃ ) be two real symmetric problems. Suppose that Δ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) for(i, j) = (0, 0) or 1 ≤ ijm, thenh= h ̃ , h= H ̃ andQ= Q ̃ .

Proof. For λ . both M ( λ ) and M ̃ ( λ ) are real symmetric. Moreover,

M j i ( λ ) = Δ 0 0 ( λ ) - Δ i j ( λ ) Δ 0 0 ( λ ) = Δ ̃ 0 0 ( λ ) - Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) Δ ̃ 0 0 ( λ ) = M ̃ j i ( λ ) ,  for  1 i j m .

Hence, M i j ( λ ) = M ̃ i j ( λ ) for λ and 1 ≤ i, jm. This leads to Δ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) for λ . We conclude that Δ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) and M i j ( λ ) = M ̃ i j ( λ ) for λ . This completes the proof. □

From now on, we let L m (Q, h, H) be a real symmetric problem. We would like to know that how many spectral data can determine the problem L m (Q, h, H) if we require all spectral data come from real symmetric problems. Denote

Γ i j = [ e 1 , , 0 ( i th-column ) , , 0 ( j th-column ) , , e m ] , Γ i j = [ 0 , , e i ( i th-column ) , , e j ( i th-column ) , ,0 ] ,

where e i = ( 0 , 0 , , 0 , 1 ( i th-coordiante ) , 0 , , 0 ) t . Hence, Γ ij + Γ ij = I m . Let Θ ij (λ) be the characteristic function of the self-adjoint problem

y + ( λ I m - Q ( x ) ) y = 0 , 0 < x < π
(2.7)

associated with some boundary conditions

Γ i j y ( 0 , λ ) - ( Γ i j h + Γ i j ) y ( 0 , λ ) = 0 , y ( π , λ ) + H y ( π , λ ) = 0 ,
(2.8)

then

Θ i j ( λ ) = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( S j ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] ,

where V (L j ) denotes the j th column of (V(L)) for a m × m matrix L. Similarly, we denote Ω ij (λ) the characteristic function of the real symmetric problem L m ( Q , h + 1 2 ( B ( i , j ) + B ( j , i ) ) , H ) for 1 ≤ i, jm, then

Ω i j ( λ ) = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) + 1 2 V ( S j ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( φ j ) + 1 2 V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) , , V ( φ m ) ] + 1 2 det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( S j ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( φ j ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] + 1 2 det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] + det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( S j ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ]
(2.9)

for 1 ≤ i, jm. For simplicity, we write

Ω 0 0 ( λ ) = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ j ) , , V ( φ m ) ] .

Now, we are going to focus on self-adjoint problems. For a self-adjoint problem L m (Q, h, H) all its eigenvalues are real and the geometric multiplicity of an eigenvalue is equal to its algebraic multiplicity. Moreover, if we denote {(λ i , m i )}i = 1,∞the spectral data of L m (Q, h, H) where m i is the multiplicity of the eigenvalue λ i of L m (Q, h, H) then the characteristic function of L m (Q, h, H) is

Δ ( λ ) = C Π i = 1 ( 1 - λ λ i ) m i

where C is determined by {(λ i , m i )}i = 1,∞. This means that the spectral data determined the corresponding characteristic function.

Theorem 2.6. Assuming that L m (Q, h, H) and L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) are two real symmetric problems. If the conditions

  1. (1)

    Ω i j ( λ ) = Ω ̃ i j ( λ ) for (i, j) = (0, 0) or 1 ≤ ijm,

  2. (2)

    Θ i j ( λ ) = Θ ̃ i j ( λ ) for 1 ≤ i < jm.,

are satisfied, thenh= h ̃ , H= H ̃ andQ ( x ) = Q ̃ ( x ) a.e on [0, 1].

Proof. Note that for any problem L m (Q, h, H) we have

Δ i j ( λ ) = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( φ j ) + V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] = det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ j ) , , V ( φ m ) ] + det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] = Δ 00 ( λ ) + det [ V ( φ 1 ) , , V ( φ i ) ( i th-column ) , , V ( S i ) ( j th-column ) , , V ( φ m ) ] = Δ 00 ( λ ) Δ 00 ( λ ) M j i ( λ ) .

Similarly,

Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ 0 0 ( λ ) - Δ ̃ 0 0 ( λ ) M ̃ j i ( λ ) .

Moreover, by the assumptions and Lemma 2.4, we have M ij (λ) = M ji (λ) Hence,

  1. (1)

    Δ ij (λ) = Δ ji (λ) and Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ j i ( λ ) for 1 ≤ ijm,

  2. (2)

    Δ i i ( λ ) = Ω i i ( λ ) = Ω ̃ i i ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i i ( λ ) for i = 0, 1, ..., m,

  3. (3)

    Δ i j ( λ ) = Ω i j ( λ ) - Θ i j ( λ ) = Ω ̃ i j ( λ ) - Θ ̃ i j ( λ ) = Δ ̃ i j ( λ ) for 1 ≤ i < jm.

This implies L m ( Q , h , H ) = L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) .

The authors want to emphasis that for n = 1, the result is classical; for n = 2, Theorem 2.6 leads to Theorem 1.1. Shen also shows by providing an example that 5 minimal number of spectral sets can determine the potential matrix uniquely (see [18]).

The readers may think that if all Q, h and H are diagonals then L m (Q, h, H) is an uncoupled system. Hence, everything for the operator L m (Q, h, H) can be obtained by applying inverse spectral theory for scalar Sturm-Liouville equation. Unfortunately, it is not true. We say L m (Q, h, H) diagonal if all Q, h and H are diagonals.

Corollary 2.7. Suppose L m (Q, h, H) and L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) are both diagonals. If Δ k k ( λ ) = Δ ̃ k k ( λ ) for k = 0, 1, ..., m, thenQ= Q ̃ , h= h ̃ andH= H ̃ .

Proof. Since L m (Q, h, H) and L m ( Q ̃ , h ̃ , H ̃ ) are both diagonals, we know

M ( λ ) = - Adj ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) det ( φ ( π , λ ) + H φ ( π , λ ) ) ( S ( π , λ ) + H S ( π , λ ) )

is diagonal and so is M ̃ ( λ ) . Hence,

M i j ( λ ) = 0  for  i j , 1 i , j m .

Moreover,

M k k ( λ ) = 1 Δ 00 ( λ ) ( φ 1 ( π , λ ) + H 1 φ 1 ( π , λ ) ( S k ( π , λ ) + H k S k ( π , λ ) ) ( k ) = 1 Δ 00 ( λ ) ( Δ k k ( λ ) Δ 00 ( λ ) ) = Δ 00 ( λ ) Δ k k ( λ ) Δ 00 ( λ ) = Δ ˜ 00 ( λ ) Δ ˜ k k ( λ ) Δ ˜ 00 ( λ ) = M ˜ k k ( λ ) .

for k = 1, 2, ..., m. This implies. M ( λ ) = M ̃ ( λ ) . Applying Theorem 2.1 again, we have Q= Q ̃ , h= h ̃ and H= H ̃ . □

Footnote

This work was partially supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan, ROC.

References

  1. Borg G: Eine Umkehrung der Sturm-Liouvilleschen Eigenwertaufgabe Bestimmung der Differentialgleichung durch die Eigenwerte. Acta Math 1945, 78: 1-96.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gesztesy F, Simon B: On the determination of a potential from three spectra. In: Differential Operators and Spectral Theory. In Am Math Soc Transl Ser 2. Volume 189. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; 1999:85-92.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hochstadt H: The inverse Sturm-Liouville problem. Commun Pure Appl Math 1973, 26: 75129.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Hochstadt H, Lieberman B: An inverse Sturm-Liouville problem with mixed given data. SIAM J Appl Math 1978, 34: 67680.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Kren MG: Solution of the inverse Sturm-Liouville problem. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 1951, 76: 214.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levitan BM: Inverse Sturm-Liouville Problems. VNM, Utrecht; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Levitan BM, Gasymov MG: Determination of a differential equation by two of its spectra. Russ Math Surv 1964, 19: 163. 10.1070/RM1964v019n03ABEH001151

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Marchenko VA: Sturm-Liouville Operators and Applications. Birkhauser, Basel 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yurko VA: Method of spectral mappings in the inverse problem theory. Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems Series 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andersson E: On the M-function and Borg-Marchenko theorems for vector-valued Sturm-Liouville equations. J Math Phys 44(12):6077-6100.

  11. Carlson R: An inverse problem for the matrix Schrödinger equation. J Math Anal Appl 2002, 267: 564-575. 10.1006/jmaa.2001.7792

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chern H-H, Shen C-L: On the n-dimensional Ambarzumyan's theorem. Inverse Probl 13(1):15-18.

  13. Clarka S, Gesztesy F, Holdenc H, Levitand BM: Borg-Type theorems for matrix-valued Schrödinger operators. J Differ Equ 2000, 167(1):181-210. 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gesztesy F, Kiselev A, Makarov K-A: Uniqueness results for matrix-valued Schrödinger, Jacobi, and Dirac-Type operators. Math Nachr 2002, 239-240(1):103-145. 10.1002/1522-2616(200206)239:1<103::AID-MANA103>3.0.CO;2-F

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jodeit M, Levitan BM: The isospectrality problem for the classical Sturm-Liouville equation. Adv Differ Equ 1997, 22: 297-318.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Jodeit M, Levitan BM: Isospectral vector-valued Sturm-Liouville problems. Lett Math Phys 1998, 43: 117-122. 10.1023/A:1007498010532

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen C-L: Some eigenvalue problems for the vectorial Hill's equation. Inverse Probl 2000, 16(3):749-783. 10.1088/0266-5611/16/3/313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen C-L: Some inverse spectral problems for vectorial Sturm-Liouville equations. Inverse Probl 2001, 17(5):1253-1294. 10.1088/0266-5611/17/5/303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shieh C-T: Isospectral sets and inverse problems for vector-valued Sturm-Liouville equations. Inverse Probl 2007, 23(6):2457-2468. 10.1088/0266-5611/23/6/011

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Yurko VA: Inverse problems for the matrix Sturm-Liouville equation on a finite intervl. Inverse Probl 2006, 22: 1139-1149. 10.1088/0266-5611/22/4/002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung-Tsun Shieh.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Both authors contributed to each part of this work equally and read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, TH., Shieh, CT. Uniqueness of the potential function for the vectorial Sturm-Liouville equation on a finite interval. Bound Value Probl 2011, 40 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2011-40

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2011-40

Keywords