Ground state and mountain pass solutions for discrete p ( ⋅ ) -Laplacian

In this paper we study the existence of solutions for discrete -Laplacian equations subjected to a potential type boundary condition. Our approach relies on Szulkin’s critical point theory and enables us to obtain the existence of ground state as well as mountain pass type solutions.

MSC: 39A12, 39A70, 49J40, 65Q10.

Let T be a positive integer, and be defined by for all and . Here and below, for with , we use the notation .

This paper is concerned with the existence of solutions for equations of the type

subjected to the potential boundary condition

where is the forward difference operator and stands for the discrete -Laplacian operator, that is,

Here and hereafter, is a continuous function, while is convex, proper (i.e., ), lower semicontinuous (in short, l.s.c.) and ∂j denotes the subdifferential of j. Recall, for , the set is defined by

where stands for the usual inner product in .

It should be noticed that the boundary condition (1.2) recovers the classical ones. For instance, denoting by the indicator function of a closed, nonempty and convex set , the Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions are obtained by choosing with and , respectively. If p is T-periodic, taking () and , we get the periodic (antiperiodic) conditions. For other choices of j yielding various boundary conditions, we refer the reader to Gasinski and Papageorgiou [1] and Jebelean [2].

The study of boundary value problems with a discrete p-Laplacian using variational approaches has captured attention in the last years. Most of the papers deal with classical boundary conditions such as Dirichlet (see, e.g., Agarwal et al.[3], Cabada et al.[4]), Neumann (Candito and D’Agui [5], Tian and Ge [6]) and periodic (He and Chen [7], Jebelean and Şerban [8]). Also, we note the recent paper of Mawhin [9] where variational techniques are employed to obtain the existence of periodic solutions for systems involving a general discrete ϕ-Laplacian operator.

Boundary value problems with the discrete -Laplacian subjected to Dirichlet, Neumann or periodic boundary conditions were studied in recent time by Bereanu et al.[10], Galewski and Glab [11,12], Guiro et al.[13], Koné and Ouaro [14], Mashiyev et al.[15], Mihăilescu et al.[16,17].

Here, we use a variational approach to obtain ground state and mountain pass solutions for problem (1.1), (1.2). In this view, we employ some ideas originated in Jebelean and Moroşanu [18] (also see Jebelean [2]) combined with specific technicalities due to the discrete and anisotropic character of the problem. The main existence results are Theorem 3.1 and Theorem 4.2. These recover and generalize the similar ones for p= constant obtained in [19].

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The functional framework and the variational approach of problem (1.1), (1.2) are presented in Section 2. In Section 3, we obtain the existence of ground state solutions, while Section 4 is devoted to the existence of mountain pass type solutions. An example of application is given in Section 5.

Our approach for the boundary value problem (1.1), (1.2) relies on the critical point theory developed by Szulkin [20]. With this aim, we introduce the space

which will be considered with the Luxemburg norm

for some . Also, we shall make use of the usual sup-norm .

Next, let be defined by

Standard arguments show that φ is convex, of class . Using the summation by parts formula (see, e.g., [8,19]), one obtains that its derivative is given by

By means of j, we introduce the functional given by

Note that, as j is proper, convex and l.s.c., the same properties hold true for J. Then setting

it is clear that ψ is proper, convex and l.s.c. on X.

Further, we define by

and

It is a simple matter to check that and

The energy functional associated to problem (1.1), (1.2) is

with ψ in (2.4) and Φ given by (2.5).

Proposition 2.1Ifis a critical point of the functionalin the sense that

thenxis a solution of problem (1.1), (1.2).

Proof In (2.7), we take , ; then dividing by s and letting , we get

where is the directional derivative of the convex function J at x in the direction of w. By virtue of (2.3), the above inequality becomes

Using (2.2), (2.6) and the summation by parts formula, a straightforward computation shows that

for all . Thus, we infer

for all with . This implies that

To prove that x satisfies condition (1.2), we multiply the equality (2.9) by . Then summing from 1 to T and using (2.8), one obtains

for all . Taking with and , where are arbitrarily chosen, we have

which, by a standard result from convex analysis, means that

and the proof is complete. □

From now on, we will use the following notations:

Remark 2.2 It is easy to check that for all and any , we have

We begin by a result which states that the energy functional has a minimum point in X provided that the potential of the nonlinearity f lies asymptotically on the left of the first eigenvalue like constant

Theorem 3.1If

then problem (1.1), (1.2) has at least one solution which minimizesonX.

Proof By the continuity of Φ and the lower semicontinuity of ψ, we have that the functional is sequentially l.s.c. on X. It remains to prove that is coercive on X. Then, by the direct method in calculus of variations, is bounded from below and attains its infimum at some , which, by virtue of ([20], Proposition 1.1) and Proposition 2.1, is a solution of problem (1.1), (1.2).

From (3.2) there are constants and such that

If , we may assume that . On the other hand, by the continuity of F, there is a constant such that

Hence, we infer

To prove the coercivity of , from the above inequality, we obtain

where .

If , using (2.11) from Remark 2.2, we have

In the case , by virtue of (2.11) and (3.1), for , one obtains

which, using again (3.1), implies

In both cases, by virtue of (3.3) and (3.5), there exist constants such that

On the other hand, as j is convex and l.s.c., it is bounded from below by an affine functional. Therefore, on account of (2.3), there are positive constants , , such that

with and . Since any norm on X is equivalent to , there exists such that

Consequently,

meaning that is coercive on and the proof is complete. □

In order to give an application of Theorem 3.1, we consider the problem

where is a continuous function and λ is a positive parameter.

Corollary 3.2Assume thatandgsatisfies the growth condition

where, are constants and. The following hold true:

(i) if, then problem (3.6) has a solution for any;

(ii) if, then there is somesuch that for any, problem (3.6) has a solution.

Proof We apply Theorem 3.1 with for all and . From (3.7), we obtain

Thus, we deduce

for all and with . So, if , then

Also, if , setting

it is easy to see that condition (3.2) is fulfilled for any . □

Remark 3.3

(i) Note that a valid in Corollary 3.2(ii) is given by formula (3.8).

(ii) Theorem 5 in [11] is an immediate consequence of Corollary 3.2 with , .

In this section, we deal with the existence of nontrivial solutions for the equation

associated with the potential boundary condition (1.2). Here, f and j are as in the case of the previous problem (1.1), (1.2) and is a given function. The main tool in obtaining such a result will be the Mountain Pass Theorem [20].

To treat problem (4.1), (1.2), instead of φ, there will be defined by

which is convex, of class on X, and its derivative is given by

Then, setting , we define

with J given by (2.3) and Φ in (2.5).

By means of in (3.1), we define the constants

Lemma 4.1Ifand there exist constantsandsuch that

and

then the functionaldefined in (4.4) satisfies the Palais-Smale condition ((PS) condition for short) on, i.e., every sequencefor whichand

where, possesses a convergent subsequence.

Proof Let be a sequence for which and (4.8) holds true with . Since X is finite dimensional, it is sufficient to prove that is bounded. In order to show this, we may assume that and for all . By virtue of (2.11), (3.1) and (4.5), we get

From (2.3) and (4.6), it follows

with . Using (4.7) we deduce that, for all , it holds

Clearly, there is a constant , such that

Further, setting in (4.8), dividing by and then letting , we obtain

Using (4.12) and (4.13), we deduce that

and by virtue of (4.10), (4.11), (4.3) and (4.9), we have

Since , we infer that is bounded and the proof is complete. □

Now, we can state the following result of Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz type [21].

Theorem 4.2Assume thatand, in addition,

(i) ;

(ii) , ;

(iii) there are constantsandsuch that (4.6) holds true and

Then, problem (4.1), (1.2) has a nontrivial solution.

Proof Without loss of generality, we may assume that

which implies that . From (i), (2.3) and (4.15), we have

From Lemma 4.1 and (iii), the functional satisfies the (PS) condition on .

Next, we shall prove that has a ‘mountain pass’ geometry:

(a) there exist such that if ;

(b) for some with .

By the equivalence of the norms on X, there is some such that

Using (ii) we can find constants and such that

Let , with , be arbitrarily chosen. From (4.17) and (4.18), we have

which implies

Now, using (2.10) and (3.1), we get

By virtue of (3.1), (4.5), (4.2) and (4.19), we deduce

On account of (4.16), we infer that

with , and condition (a) is fulfilled.

Our next task is to prove that satisfies condition (b). To this end, let us first observe that, by virtue of (4.14), there exist such that

Let be such that and . Using (2.11) and (4.5), one obtains

From (4.15), we have that

which, together with (4.21) and (4.22) for any , gives

as because . Hence, we can choose large enough to satisfy and , with μ entering in (4.20). This means that condition (b) is satisfied with . □

In this section, we show how Theorem 4.2 can be applied to derive the existence of nontrivial solutions for equation (4.1) associated with some concrete boundary conditions.

Let be a convex and Gâteaux differentiable function with , where dg denotes the differential of g. Also, given a nonempty closed convex cone , we denote by the normal cone to K at , i.e.,

The equation (4.1) is considered to be associated with the boundary conditions

We set

Theorem 5.1Ifis continuous, and, in addition, we assume that

(i) , ;

(ii) there are constantsandsuch that (4.14) holds true and

then problem (4.1), (5.1) has a nontrivial solution.

Proof Since for all , Theorem 4.2 applies with , . □

Remark 5.2 Conditions (5.1) allow various possible choices of g and K, which, among others, recover classical boundary conditions. For instance, if , then the homogeneous boundary conditions

are obtained by choosing , respectively . If, in addition, p is T-periodic, then taking and , we get

respectively. If the T-periodicity condition is not assumed, then we only have

instead of and , respectively. As , in these four cases, condition (5.2) is automatically satisfied with any and .

Also, if are given, then with g defined by

and , we deduce the Sturm-Liouville type boundary conditions

In this case, (5.2) is fulfilled with any and .

Therefore, sufficient conditions ensuring the existence of nontrivial solutions of (4.1) subjected to one of the above boundary conditions can be easily stated by means of Theorem 5.1.

Remark 5.3 It is worth pointing out that in the cases of Dirichlet and antiperiodic boundary conditions, is allowed to be =0, and hence, r may be ≥0 on ; while in the Neumann, periodic and Sturm-Liouville cases, must be >0, meaning on .

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Dedicated to Professor Jean Mawhin for his 70th anniversary.

The research of CŞ was supported by the strategic grant POSDRU/CPP107/DMI1.5/S/78421, Project ID 78421 (2010), co-financed by the European Social Fund - Investing in People, within the Sectoral Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007-2013. Also, the support for CB and PJ from the grant TE-PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-0157 (CNCS-Romania) is gratefully acknowledged.

1. Gasinski, L, Papageorgiou, NS: Nonlinear second-order multivalued boundary value problems . Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci.. 113, 293–319 (2003). Publisher Full Text

2. Jebelean, P: Variational methods for ordinary p-Laplacian systems with potential boundary conditions . Adv. Differ. Equ.. 13(3-4), 273–322 (2008)

3. Agarwal, RP, Perera, K, O’Regan, D: Multiple positive solutions of singular discrete p-Laplacian problems via variational methods . Adv. Differ. Equ.. 2005(2), 93–99 (2005)

4. Cabada, A, Iannizzotto, A, Tersian, S: Multiple solutions for discrete boundary value problems . J. Math. Anal. Appl.. 356, 418–428 (2009). Publisher Full Text

5. Candito, P, D’Agui, G: Three solutions for a discrete nonlinear Neumann problem involving p-Laplacian . Adv. Differ. Equ.. 2010, Article ID 862016 (2010)

6. Tian, Y, Ge, W: The existence of solutions for a second-order discrete Neumann problem with a p-Laplacian . J. Appl. Math. Comput.. 26, 333–340 (2008). Publisher Full Text

7. He, T, Chen, W: Periodic solutions of second order discrete convex systems involving the p-Laplacian . Appl. Math. Comput.. 206, 124–132 (2008). Publisher Full Text

8. Jebelean, P, Şerban, C: Ground state periodic solutions for difference equations with discrete p-Laplacian . Appl. Math. Comput.. 217, 9820–9827 (2011). Publisher Full Text

9. Mawhin, J: Periodic solutions of second order nonlinear difference systems with ϕ-Laplacian: a variational approach . Nonlinear Anal.. 75(12), 4672–4687 (2012). Publisher Full Text

10. Bereanu, C, Jebelean, P, Şerban, C: Periodic and Neumann problems for discrete -Laplacian . J. Math. Anal. Appl. doi:10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.09.047 (2012)

11. Galewski, M, Gła̧b, S: On the discrete boundary value problem for anisotropic equation . J. Math. Anal. Appl.. 386, 956–965 (2012). Publisher Full Text

12. Galewski, M, Gła̧b, S: Positive solutions for anisotropic discrete BVP. arXiv:1203.4504v1

13. Guiro, A, Nyanquini, I, Ouaro, S: On the solvability of discrete nonlinear Neumann problems involving the -Laplacian . Adv. Differ. Equ.. 2011, Article ID 32 (2011)

14. Koné, B, Ouaro, S: Weak solutions for anisotropic discrete boundary value problems . J. Differ. Equ. Appl.. 16(2), 1–11 (2010)

15. Mashiyev, R, Yucedag, Z, Ogras, S: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a Dirichlet problem involving the discrete -Laplacian operator . Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ.. 67, 1–10 (2011)

16. Mihăilescu, M, Rădulescu, V, Tersian, S: Eigenvalue problems for anisotropic discrete boundary value problems . J. Differ. Equ. Appl.. 15(6), 557–567 (2009). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text

17. Mihăilescu, M, Rădulescu, V, Tersian, S: Homoclinic solutions of difference equations with variable exponents . Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal.. 38, 277–289 (2011)

18. Jebelean, P, Moroşanu, G: Ordinary p-Laplacian systems with nonlinear boundary conditions . J. Math. Anal. Appl.. 313, 738–753 (2006). Publisher Full Text

19. Şerban, C: Existence of solutions for discrete p-Laplacian with potential boundary conditions . J. Differ. Equ. Appl. doi:10.1080/10236198.2012.657631 (2012)

20. Szulkin, A: Minimax principles for lower semicontinuous functions and applications to nonlinear boundary value problems . Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non Linéaire. 3(2), 77–109 (1986)

21. Ambrosetti, A, Rabinowitz, PH: Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications . J. Funct. Anal.. 14, 349–381 (1973). Publisher Full Text