Table 1
|
| A comparison of−f″(0)obtained by the analytical method with the shooting technique
for different values ofM |
| M |
 |
| Analytical |
Numerical |
|
0
|
1.22474
|
1.281809
|
|
1
|
1.58114
|
1.629178
|
|
2
|
1.87083
|
1.912620
|
|
3
|
2.12132
|
2.158736
|
|
5
|
2.54951
|
2.581130
|
|
10
|
3.39116
|
3.41529
|
Kameswaran et al. Boundary Value Problems 2012 2012:105 doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2012-105