Table 2

A comparison of<a onClick="popup('http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M128','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M128">View MathML</a>obtained by the analytical method with the shooting technique for different values ofM,GbandKfor fixed values of<a onClick="popup('http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M129','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M129">View MathML</a>
M K Gb <a onClick="popup('http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M130','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.boundaryvalueproblems.com/content/2012/1/105/mathml/M130">View MathML</a>
Analytical Numerical
0 0.5 0.2 3.82684 3.822508
1 3.48576 3.483155
2 3.19181 3.191131
3 2.92781 2.928577
1 0 0.2 4.56379 4.556219
0.5 3.48576 3.483155
1 2.90556 2.905805
2 2.25649 2.260503
3 1.88314 1.889815
1 0.5 0 3.94905 3.946604
0.1 3.71740 3.714879
0.2 3.48576 3.483155
0.5 2.79082 2.787982
1 1.63260 1.629360

Kameswaran et al.

Kameswaran et al. Boundary Value Problems 2012 2012:105   doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2012-105

Open Data