Research

# Existence of solutions for a differential inclusion problem with singular coefficients involving the p(x)-Laplacian

Guowei Dai*, Ruyun Ma and Qiaozhen Ma

Author Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, P.R. China

For all author emails, please log on.

Boundary Value Problems 2012, 2012:11  doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2012-11

 Received: 5 November 2011 Accepted: 9 February 2012 Published: 9 February 2012

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### Abstract

Using the non-smooth critical point theory we investigate the existence and multiplicity of solutions for a differential inclusion problem with singular coefficients involving the p(x)-Laplacian.

Mathematics Subject Classification 2000: 35D05; 35J20; 35J60; 35J70.

##### Keywords:
p(x)-Laplacian; differential inclusion; singularity

### 1 Introduction

In this article, we study the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the differential inclusion problem with singular coefficients involving the p(x)-Laplacian of the form

- div ( | u | p ( x ) - 2 u ) λ a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , u ) + μ a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , u ) in Ω , u = 0 on Ω , (1.1)

where the following conditions are satisfied:

(P) Ω is a bounded open domain in ℝN, N ≥ 2, p C ( Ω ̄ ) , 1 < p- := infΩ p(x) ≤ p+ := supΩ p(x) < +∞, λ, μ ∈ ℝ.

(A) For i = 1, 2, a i L r i ( x ) ( Ω ) , a i ( x ) > 0 for x ∈ Ω, Gi(x, u) is measurable with respect to x (for every u ∈ ℝ) and locally Lipschitz with respect to u (for a.e. x ∈ Ω), ∂Gi : Ω × ℝ → ℝ is the Clarke sub-differential of Gi and | ξ i | c 1 + c 2 | t | q i ( x ) - 1 for x ∈ Ω, t ∈ ℝ and ξi ∈ ∂Gi, where ci is a positive constant, r i , q i C Ω ̄ , r i - > 1 , q i - > 1 , ri(x) > qi(x) for all x ∈ Ω, and

q i ( x ) < r i ( x ) - q i ( x ) r i ( x ) p * ( x ) , x Ω ¯ , (1.2)

here

p * ( x ) = N p ( x ) N - p ( x ) if  p ( x ) < N , if  p ( x ) N . (1.3)

( A 1 ) q 1 + < p - . ( A 2 ) q 2 - > p + .

A typical example of (1.1) is the following problem involving subcritical Sobolev-Hardy exponents of the form

- div ( | u | p ( x ) - 2 u ) λ 1 | x | s 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , u ) + μ 1 | x | s 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , u ) in Ω , u = 0 on Ω , (1.4)

and in this case the assumption corresponding to (A) is the following

( A ) * 0 Ω ̄ , for i = 1, 2, ∂Gi : Ω × ℝ → ℝ is the Clarke sub-differential of Gi and | ξ i | c 1 + c 2 | t | q i ( x ) - 1 for x ∈ Ω, t ∈ ℝ and ξi Gi, where ci is a positive constant, s i , q i C Ω ̄ , 0 s i - s i + < N , q i - > 1 , and

q i ( x ) < N - s i ( x ) q i ( x ) N p * ( x ) , x Ω ̄ . (1.5)

The operator -div(|∇u|p(x)-2 u) is said to be the p(x)-Laplacian, and becomes p-Laplacian when p(x) ≡ p (a constant). The p(x)-Laplacian possesses more complicated nonlinearities than the p-Laplacian; for example, it is inhomogeneous. The study of various mathematical problems with variable exponent growth condition has been received considerable attention in recent years. These problems are interesting in applications and raise many difficult mathematical problems. One of the most studied models leading to problem of this type is the model of motion of electro-rheological fluids, which are characterized by their ability to drastically change the mechanical properties under the influence of an exterior electro-magnetic field [1,2]. Problems with variable exponent growth conditions also appear in the mathematical modeling of stationary thermo-rheological viscous flows of non-Newtonian fluids and in the mathematical description of the processes filtration of an ideal baro-tropic gas through a porous medium [3,4]. Another field of application of equations with variable exponent growth conditions is image processing [5]. The variable nonlinearity is used to outline the borders of the true image and to eliminate possible noise. We refer the reader to [6-11] for an overview of and references on this subject, and to [12-21] for the study of the p(x)-Laplacian equations and the corresponding variational problems.

Since many free boundary problems and obstacle problems may be reduced to partial differential equations with discontinuous nonlinearities, the existence of multiple solutions for Dirichlet boundary value problems with discontinuous nonlinearities has been widely investigated in recent years. Chang [22] extended the variational methods to a class of non-differentiable functionals, and directly applied the variational methods for non-differentiable functionals to prove some existence theorems for PDE with discontinuous nonlinearities. Later Kourogenis and Papageorgiou [23] obtained some nonsmooth critical point theories and applied these to nonlinear elliptic equations at resonance, involving the p-Laplacian with discontinuous nonlinearities. In the celebrated work [24,25], Ricceri elaborated a Ricceri-type variational principle and a three critical points theorem for the Gâteaux differentiable functional, respectively. Later, Marano and Motreanu [26,27] extended Ricceri's results to a large class of non-differentiable functionals and gave some applications to differential inclusion problems involving the p-Laplacian with discontinuous nonlinearities.

In [21], by means of the critical point theory, Fan obtain the existence and multiplicity of solutions for (1.1) under the condition of G i ( x , ) C 1 ( ) and  g i = G i satisfying the Carathéodory condition for i = 1, 2, x ∈ Ω. The aim of the present article is to generalize the main results of [21] to the case of the functional of problem (1.1) is nonsmooth.

This article is organized as follows: In Section 2, we present some necessary preliminary knowledge on variable exponent Sobolev spaces and the generalized gradient of the locally Lipschitz function; In Section 3, we give the variational principle which is needed in the sequel; In Section 4, using the critical point theory, we prove the existence and multiplicity results for problem (1.1).

### 2 Preliminaries

#### 2.1 Variable exponent Sobolev spaces

Let Ω be a bounded open subset of ℝN, denote L + ( Ω ) = { p L ( Ω ) : ess inf Ω p ( x ) 1 } .

For p L + ( Ω ) , denote

p - = p - ( Ω ) = ess  inf x Ω p ( x ) , p + = p + ( Ω ) = ess  sup x Ω p ( x ) .

On the basic properties of the space W1,p(x)(Ω) we refer to [7,28-30]. Here we display some facts which will be used later.

Denote by S(Ω) the set of all measurable real functions defined on Ω. Two functions in S(Ω) are considered as the same element of S(Ω) when they are equal almost everywhere. For p L + ( Ω ) , define the spaces Lp(x) (Ω) and W1,p(x) (Ω) by

L p ( x ) Ω = u S ( Ω ) : Ω | u ( x ) | p ( x ) d x <

with the norm

| u | L p ( x ) Ω = | u | p ( x ) = inf λ > 0 : Ω u ( x ) λ p ( x ) d x 1 ,

and

W 1 , p x Ω = u L p x Ω : u L p x Ω

with the norm

| | u | | W 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) = | u | L p ( x ) ( Ω ) + | u | L p ( x ) ( Ω ) .

Denote by W 0 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) the closure of C 0 ( Ω ) in W1,p(x) (Ω) . Hereafter, we always assume that p- > 1.

Proposition 2.1. [7,31]The spaces Lp(x) (Ω) , W1,p(x) (Ω) and W 0 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) are separable and reflexive Banach spaces.

Proposition 2.2. [7,31]The conjugate space of Lp(x) (Ω) is L p 0 ( x ) ( Ω ) , where 1 p ( x ) + 1 p 0 ( x ) = 1 . For any u Lp(x) (Ω) and v L p 0 ( x ) ( Ω ) , Ω | u v | d x 2 | u | p ( x ) | v | p 0 ( x ) .

Proposition 2.3. [7,31]In W 0 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) the Poincaré inequality holds, that is, there exists a positive constant c such that

| u | L p ( x ) ( Ω ) c | u | L p ( x ) ( Ω ) u W 0 1 , p x Ω .

So | u | L p ( x ) ( Ω ) is an equivalent norm in W 0 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) .

Proposition 2.4. [7,28,29,31]Assume that the boundary of Ω possesses the cone property and p C ( Ω ̄ ) . If q C ( Ω ̄ ) and 1 q ( x ) < p * ( x ) f o r x Ω ̄ , then there is a compact embedding W1,p(x)(Ω) → Lq(x) (Ω).

Let us now consider the weighted variable exponent Lebesgue space.

Let a S(Ω) and a(x) > 0 for x ∈ Ω. Define

L a ( x ) p ( x ) Ω = u S ( Ω ) : Ω a ( x ) u ( x ) p ( x ) d x <

with the norm

u L a ( x ) p ( x ) Ω = u ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) = inf λ > 0 : Ω a ( x ) u ( x ) λ p ( x ) d x 1 ,

then L a ( x ) p ( x ) ( Ω ) is a Banach space. The following proposition follows easily from the definition of | u | L a ( x ) p ( x ) ( Ω ) .

Proposition 2.5. (see [7,31]) Set ρ(u) = Ω a(x)|u(x)|p(x) dx. For u , u k L a ( x ) p ( x ) ( Ω ) , we have

(1) F o r u 0 , | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) = λ ρ u λ = 1 .

(2) | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) ρ ( u ) < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) .

(3) I f | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) > 1 , t h e n | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) p - ρ u | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) p + .

(4) I f | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) < 1 , t h e n | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) p + ρ ( u ) | u | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) p .

(5) lim k | u k | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) = 0 lim k ρ ( u k ) = 0 .

(6) | u k | ( p ( x ) , a ( x ) ) ρ ( u k ) .

Proposition 2.6. (see [21]) Assume that the boundary of Ω possesses the cone property and p C ( Ω ̄ ) . Suppose that a Lr(x)(Ω), a(x) > 0 for x ∈ Ω, r C ( Ω ̄ ) and r- > 1. If q C ( Ω ̄ ) and

1 q ( x ) < r ( x ) - 1 r ( x ) p * ( x ) : = p a ( x ) * ( x ) , x Ω ̄ , (2.1)

then there is a compact embedding W 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) L a ( x ) q ( x ) ( Ω ) .

The following proposition plays an important role in the present article.

Proposition 2.7. Assume that the boundary of Ω possesses the cone property and p C ( Ω ̄ ) . Suppose that a Lr(x)(Ω), a(x) > 0 for x ∈ Ω, r C ( Ω ̄ ) and r(x) > q(x) for all x ∈ Ω. If q C ( Ω ̄ ) and

1 q ( x ) < r ( x ) - q ( x ) r ( x ) p * ( x ) , x Ω ̄ , (2.2)

then there is a compact embedding W 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) L ( a ( x ) ) q ( x ) q ( x ) ( Ω ) .

Proof. Set r 1 ( x ) = r ( x ) q ( x ) , then r 1 - > 1 and ( a ( x ) ) q ( x ) L r 1 ( x ) ( Ω ) . Moreover, from (2.2) we can get

1 q ( x ) < r 1 ( x ) - 1 r 1 ( x ) p * ( x ) , x Ω ̄ .

Using Proposition 2.6, we see that the embedding W 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) L ( a ( x ) ) q ( x ) q ( x ) ( Ω ) is compact.

#### 2.2 Generalized gradient of the locally Lipschitz function

Let (X, || · ||) be a real Banach space and X* be its topological dual. A function f : X → ℝ is called locally Lipschitz if each point u X possesses a neighborhood Ωu such that |f(u1) - f(u2)| ≤ L||u1 - u2|| for all u1, u2 ∈ Ωu, for a constant L > 0 depending on Ωu. The generalized directional derivative of f at the point u X in the direction v X is

f 0 ( u , v ) = lim sup w u , t 0 1 t ( f ( w + t v ) - f ( w ) ) .

The generalized gradient of f at u X is defined by

f ( u ) = { u * X * : u * , φ f 0 ( u ; φ ) for all φ X } ,

which is a non-empty, convex and w*-compact subset of X, where 〈·,·〉 is the duality pairing between X* and X. We say that u X is a critical point of f if 0 ∈ ∂f(u). For further details, we refer the reader to Chang [22].

We list some fundamental properties of the generalized directional derivative and gradient that will be used throughout the article.

Proposition 2.8. (see [22,32]) (1) Let j : X → ℝ be a continuously differentiable function. Then j(u) = {j'(u)}, j0(u; z) coincides with j' (u), zX and (f + j)0(u, z) = f0(u; z) + 〈j' (u), zX for all u, z X.

(2) The set-valued mapping u → ∂f(u) is upper semi-continuous in the sense that for each u0 X, ε > 0, v X, there is a δ > 0, such that for each w ∈ ∂f (u) with ||w - u0|| < δ, there is w0 ∈ ∂f (u0)

w - w 0 , v < ε .

(3) (Lebourg's mean value theorem) Let u and v be two points in X. Then there exists a point w in the open segment joining u and v and x w * f ( w ) such that

f ( u ) - f ( v ) = x w * , u - v X .

(4) The function

m ( u ) = min w f ( u ) w X *

exists, and is lower semi continuous; i.e., lim inf u u 0 m ( u ) m ( u 0 ) .

In the following we need the nonsmooth version of Palais-Smale condition.

Definition 2.1. We say that φ satisfies the (PS)c-condition if any sequence {un} ⊂ X such that φ(un) → c and m(un) → 0, as n → +∞, has a strongly convergent subsequence, where m(un) = inf{||u*||X* : u* ∈ ∂φ (un)}.

In what follows we write the (PS)c-condition as simply the PS-condition if it holds for every level c ∈ ℝ for the Palais-Smale condition at level c.

### 3 Variational principle

In this section we assume that Ω and p(x) satisfy the assumption (P). For simplicity we write X = W 0 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) and ||u|| = |∇u|p(x) for u X. Denote by un ⇀ u and un u the weak convergence and strong convergence of sequence {un} in X, respectively, denote by c and ci the generic positive constants, Bρ = {u X : ||u|| < ρ}, Sρ = {u X : ||u|| = ρ}.

Set

F ( x , t ) = λ a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , t ) + μ a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , t ) , (3.1)

where ai and Gi (i = 1, 2) are as in (A).

Define the integral functional

φ ( u ) = Ω 1 p ( x ) | u | p ( x ) d x - Ω F ( x , u ) d x , u X . (3.2)

We write

J ( u ) = Ω 1 p ( x ) | u | p ( x ) d x , Ψ ( u ) = Ω F ( x , u ) d x ,

then it is easy to see that J C1(X, ℝ) and φ = J - Ψ.

Below we give several propositions that will be used later.

Proposition 3.1. (see [19]) The functional J : X → ℝ is convex. The mapping J' : X X* is a strictly monotone, bounded homeomorphism, and is of (S+) type, namely

u n u   a n d   lim ¯ n J ( u n ) ( u n - u ) 0   i m p l i e s u n u .

Proposition 3.2. Ψ is weakly-strongly continuous, i.e., un u implies Ψ(un) → Ψ(u).

Proof. Define ϒ1 = ∫Ω G1(x, u) dx and ϒ2 = ∫Ω G2(x, u) dx. In order to prove Ψ is weakly-strongly continuous, we only need to prove ϒ1 and ϒ2 are weakly-strongly continuous. Since the proofs of ϒ1 and ϒ2 are identical, we will just prove ϒ1.

We assume un u in X. Then by Proposition 2.8.3, we have

ϒ 1 ( u n ) - ϒ 1 ( u ) = Ω ( G 1 ( x , u n ) - G 1 ( x , u ) ) d x = Ω ξ n ( x ) ( u n - u ) d x ,

where ξn ∈ ∂G1(,τn(x)) for some τn(x) in the open segment joining u and un. From Chang [22] we know that ξ n L q 1 0 ( x ) ( Ω ) . So using Proposition 2.5, we have

ϒ 1 ( u n ) - ϒ 1 ( u ) 0 .

Proposition 3.3. Assume (A) holds and F satisfies the following condition:

(B) F ( x , u ) θ λ a 1 ( x ) ξ 1 , u + θ μ a 2 ( x ) ξ 2 , u + b ( x ) + i = 1 m d i ( x ) | u | k i ( x ) for a.e.x ∈ Ω, all u X and ξ1 ∈ ∂G1, ξ2 ∈ ∂G2, where θ is a constant, θ < 1 p + , b L 1 ( Ω ) , d i L h i ( x ) ( Ω ) , h i , k i C ( Ω ̄ ) , k i ( x ) < h i ( x ) - 1 h i ( x ) p * ( x ) f o r x Ω ¯ , k i + < p - .

Then φ satisfies the nonsmooth (PS) condition on X.

Proof. Let {un} be a nonsmooth (PS) sequence, then by (B) we have

c + 1 + u n φ ( u n ) - θ ω , u n = Ω 1 p ( x ) - θ u n p ( x ) d x - Ω ( F ( x , u n ) - θ λ a 1 ( x ) ξ 1 , u n - θ μ a 2 ( x ) ξ 2 , u n ) d x 1 p + - θ | | u n | | p - - c 1 - Ω b ( x ) + i = 1 m d i ( x ) | u n | k i ( x ) d x 1 p + - θ | | u n | | p - - c 2 - i = 1 m | u n | ( k i ( x ) , d i ( x ) ) k i + 1 p + - θ | | u n | | p - - c 2 - c 3 i = 1 m | | u n | | k i + ,

and consequently {un} is bounded.

Thus by passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that un u in X as n → ∞. We have

J ( u n ) , u n - u - Ω λ ξ 1 n ( x ) a 1 ( x ) ( u n - u ) - Ω μ ξ 2 n ( x ) a 2 ( x ) ( u n - u ) d x ε n | | u n - u | |

with εn ↓ 0, where ξin(x) ∈ ∂Gi(x, un) for a.e. x ∈ Ω, i = 1, 2. From Chang [22] or Theorem 1.3.10 of [33], we know that ξ i n ( x ) L q 1 0 ( x ) , i = 1 , 2 . Since X is embedded compactly in L ( a i ( x ) ) q i ( x ) q i ( x ) ( Ω ) , we have that un u as n → ∞ in L ( a i ( x ) ) q i ( x ) q i ( x ) ( Ω ) , i = 1 , 2 . So using Proposition 2.2, we have

Ω ξ i n ( x ) a i ( x ) ( u n - u ) d x 0 as n , i = 1 , 2 .

Therefore we obtain lim sup n J ( u n ) , u n - u 0 . But we know that J' is a mapping of type (S+). Thus we have

u n u in X .

Remark 3.1. Note that our condition (1.2) is stronger than (1.2) of [21]. Because Ψ' is weakly-strongly continuous in [21], to verify that φ satisfies (PS) condition on X, it is enough to verify that any (PS) sequence is bounded. However, in this paper we do not know whether ξ(u) is weakly-strongly continuous, where ξ(u) ∈ ⇀Ψ. Therefore, it will be very useful to consider this problem.

Below we denote

F 1 ( x , t ) = λ a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , t ) , F 2 ( x , t ) = μ a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , t ) .

We shall use the following conditions.

(B1) ∃ c0 > 0 such that G2(x, t) ≥ - c0 for x ∈ Ω and t ∈ ℝ.

(B2) θ 0 , 1 p + and M > 0 such that 0 < G2(x, u) ≤ θ u, ξ2〉 for x∈ Ω, u X and |u| M, ξ2 ∈ ⇀G2.

Corollary 3.1. Assume (P), (A) and (A1) hold. Then φ satisfies nonsmooth (PS) condition on X provided either one of the following conditions is satisfied.

(1). λ ∈ ℝ and μ = 0.

(2). λ ∈ ℝ, μ = 0 and (B1) holds.

(3). λ ∈ ℝ, μ ∈ ℝ and (B2) holds.

Proof. In case (1) or (2), we have, for x ∈ Ω and t ∈ ℝ,

F ( x , t ) F 1 ( x , t ) + | μ | c 0 a 2 ( x ) ( c 1 a 1 ( x ) + | μ | c 0 a 2 ( x ) ) + c 2 a 1 ( x ) | t | q 1 ( x ) ,

which shows that the condition (B) with θ = 0 is satisfied.

In case (3), noting that (B2) and (A) imply (B1), by the conclusion (1) and (2) we know φ satisfies (PS) condition if μ ≤ 0. Below assume μ > 0. The conditions (B2) and (A) imply that, for x ∈ Ω and u X,

G 2 ( x , u ) θ u , ξ 2 + c 3 , and F 2 ( x , u ) θ μ a 2 ( x ) u , ξ 2  +  c 3 μ a 2 ( x ) ,

so we have

F ( x , u ) - θ λ a 1 ( x ) ξ 1 , u - θ μ a 2 ( x ) ξ 2 , u = ( F 1 ( x , u ) - θ λ a 1 ( x ) ξ 1 , u ) + ( F 2 ( x , u ) - θ μ a 2 ( x ) ξ 2 , u ) c 1 a 1 ( x ) + c 2 a 1 ( x ) | u | q 1 ( x ) + c 3 μ a 2 ( x ) ,

which shows (B) holds. The proof is complete. ■

As X is a separable and reflexive Banach space, there exist (see [[34], Section 17]) e n n = 1 X and f n n = 1 X * such that

f n e m = δ n , m = 1 if n = m 0 if n m ,

X = span ¯ { e n : n = 1 , 2 , , } ,   X * = span ¯ W * { f n : n = 1 , 2 , , } .

For k = 1, 2, . . . , denote

X k = span{ e k } , Y k = j = 1 k X j , Z k = j = k X j ¯ . (3.3)

Proposition 3.5. [35]Assume that Ψ : X → ℝ is weakly-strongly continuous and Ψ (0) = 0. Let γ > 0 be given. Set

β k = β k ( γ ) = sup u Z k , u γ | Ψ ( u ) | .

Then βk → 0 as k → ∞.

Proposition 3.6. (Nonsmooth Mountain pass theorem, see [23,33]) If X is a reflexive Banach space, φ : X → ℝ is a locally Lipschitz function which satisfies the nonsmooth (PS)c-condition, and for some r > 0 and e1 X with ||e1|| > r, max{φ(0), φ(e1)} ≤·inf{φ(u) : ||u|| = r}. Then φ has a nontrivial critical u X such that the critical value c = φ(u) is characterized by the following minimax principle

c = inf γ Γ max t [ 0 , 1 ] φ ( γ ( t )

where Γ = {γ C([0, 1], X) : γ(0) = 0, γ(1) = e1}.

Proposition 3.7. (Nonsmooth Fountain theorem, see [36]) Assume (F1) X is a Banach space, φ : X → ℝ be an invariant locally Lipschitz functional, the subspaces Xk, Yk and Zk are defined by (3.3).

If, for every k ∈ ℕ, there exist ρk > rk > 0 such that

(F2) a k : = inf u Z k u = r k φ ( u ) , k ,

(F3) b k : = max u Y k u = ρ k φ ( u ) 0 ,

(F4) φ satisfies the nonsmooth (PS)c condition for every c > 0, then φ has an unbounded sequence of critical values.

Proposition 3.8. (Nonsmooth dual Fountain theorem, see [37]) Assume (F1) is satisfied and there is a k0 > 0 such that, for each k k0, there exists ρk > γk > 0 such that

(D1) a k : = inf u Z k u = ρ k φ ( u ) 0 ,

(D2) b k : = max u Y k u = r k φ ( u ) < 0 ,

(D3) d k : = inf u % Z k | | u | | ρ k φ ( u ) 0 , k ,

(D4) φ satisfies the nonsmooth ( PS ) c * condition for every c [ d k 0 , 0 ) , then φ has a sequence of negative critical values converging to 0.

Remark 3.2. We say φ that satisfies the nonsmooth ( PS ) c * condition at level c ∈ ℝ (with respect to (Yn)) if any sequence {un} ⊂ X such that

n j , u n j Y n j , φ ( u n j ) c , m | Y n j ( u n ) 0

contains a subsequence converging to a critical point of φ.

### 4 Existence and multiplicity of solutions

In this section, using the critical point theory, we give the existence and multiplicity results for problem (1.1). We shall use the following assumptions:

( O 1 ) δ 1 > 0 , c 3 > 0 and q 3 C ( Ω ̄ ) with q 3 ( x ) < p a 1 ( x ) * ( x ) for x Ω ̄ and q 3 + < p - , such that

G 1 ( x , t ) c 3 t q 3 ( x ) , x Ω , t 0 , δ 1 .

( O 2 ) δ 2 > 0 , c 4 > 0 and q 4 C ( Ω ̄ ) with q 4 ( x ) < p a 2 ( x ) * ( x ) for x Ω ̄ and q 4 - > p + , such that

| G 2 ( x , t ) | c 4 | t | q 4 ( x ) , x Ω , | t | δ 2 .

(S) For i = 1, 2, Gi(x, -t) = Gi(x, t), ∀x ∈ Ω, ∀t ∈ ℝ.

#### Remark 4.1.

(1) It follows from (A), (A2) and (O2) that

G 2 ( x , t ) c 4 | t | q 4 ( x ) + c 5 | t | q 2 ( x ) , x Ω , t .

(2)It follows from (A) and (B2) that (see [33, p. 298])

G ( x , t ) c 6 | t | 1 / θ - c 7 , x Ω , t .

Theorem 4.1. Assume (P), (A), (A1) hold.

(1) If (B1) holds, then for every λ ∈ ℝ and μ ≤ 0, problem (1.1) has a solution which is a minimizer of the corresponding functional φ.

(2) If (B1), (A2), (O1), (O2) hold, then for every λ > 0 and μ ≤ 0, problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution v1 such that v1 is a minimizer of φ and φ(v1) < 0.

(3) If (A2), (B2), (O2) hold, then for every μ > 0, there exists λ0(μ) > 0 such that when |λ| ≤ λ0(μ), problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution u1 such that φ(u1) > 0.

(4) If (A2), (B2), (O1), (O2) holds, then for every μ > 0, there exists λ0(μ) > 0 such that when 0 < λ λ0(μ), problem (1.1) has two nontrivial solutions u1 and v1 such that φ(u1) > 0 and φ(v1) < 0.

(5) If (A2), (B2), (O1), (O2) and (S) holds, then for every μ > 0 and λ ∈ ℝ, problem (1.1) has a sequence of solutions uk} such that φuk) → ∞ as k → ∞.

(6) If (A2), (B2), (O1), (O2) and (S) holds, then for every λ > 0 and μ ∈ ℝ, problem (1.1) has a sequence of solutions vk} such that φvk) < 0 and φvk) → 0 as k → ∞.

Proof. We will use c, c' and ci as a generic positive constant. By Corollary 3.1, under the assumptions of Theorem 4.1, φ satisfies nonsmooth (PS) condition. We write

Ψ 1 ( u ) = λ Ω a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , u ) d x , Ψ 2 ( u )  =  μ Ω a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , u ) d x ,

then Ψ = Ψ1 + Ψ2, φ(u) = J(u) - Ψ (u) = J(u) - Ψ1(u) - Ψ2(u). Firstly, we use Ψ i ^ to denote its extension to L q i ( x ) ( Ω ) , where i = 1, 2. From (A) and Theorem 1.3.10 of [33] (or Chang [22]), we see that Ψ i ^ (u) is locally Lipschitz on L q i ( x ) ( Ω ) and Ψ i ^ ( u ) { ξ i ( x ) L q i 0 ( Ω ) : ξ i ( u ) G i ( x , u ) } for a.e. x ∈ Ω and i = 1, 2. In view of Proposition 2.4 and Theorem 2.2 of [22], we have that Ψ i = Ψ i ^ | X is also locally Lipschitz, and ∂Ψ1(u) ⊆ λ Ω a1(x) ∂G1(x, u) dx, ∂Ψ2(u) ⊆ μ Ω a2(x) ∂G1(x, u) dx, (see [38]), where Ψ i ^ | X stands for the restriction of Ψ i ^ to X for i = 1, 2. Therefore, φ is a locally Lipschitz functional on X.

(1) Let λ ∈ ℝ and μ ≤ 0. By (A),

| Ψ 1 ( u ) | c 1 Ω a 1 ( x ) | u | q 1 ( x ) d x + c 2 c 1 ( | u | ( q 1 ( x ) , a 1 ( x ) ) q 1 + + c 3 c 4 | | u | | q 1 + + c 3 .

By (B1), Ψ2(u) ≤ - μc0 Ω a2(x) dx = c5. Hence φ ( u ) 1 p + | | u | | p - - c 4 | | u | | q 1 + - c 6 . By (A1), q 1 + < p - , so φ is coercive, that is, φ(u) → ∞ as ||u|| → ∞. Thus φ has a minimize which is a solution of (1.1).

(2) Let λ > 0, μ ≤ 0 and the assumptions of (2) hold. By the above conclusion (1), φ has a minimize v1. Take v 0 C 0 ( Ω ) such that 0 ≤ v0(x) ≤ min{δ1, δ2}, Ω a 1 ( x ) v 0 ( x ) q 3 ( x ) d x = d 1 > 0 and Ω a 2 ( x ) v 0 ( x ) q 4 ( x ) d x = d 2 > 0 . By (O1) and (O2) we have, for t ∈ (0, 1) small enough,

φ ( t v 0 ) = Ω 1 p ( x ) | t v 0 | p ( x ) d x - λ Ω a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , t v 0 ( x ) ) d x - μ Ω a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , t v 0 ( x ) ) d x t p - Ω 1 p ( x ) | v 0 | p ( x ) d x - λ Ω a 1 ( x ) c 3 ( t v 0 ( x ) ) q 3 ( x ) d x - μ Ω a 2 ( x ) c 4 ( t v 0 ( x ) ) q 4 ( x ) d x t p - Ω 1 p ( x ) | v 0 | p ( x ) d x - t q 3 + λ c 3 d 1 - t q 4 - μ c 4 d 2 .

Since q 3 + < p - < q 4 - , we can find t0 ∈ (0, 1) such that φ(t0v0) < 0, and this shows φ(v1) = infuX φ(u) < 0. So v1 ≠ 0 because φ(0) = 0. The conclusion (2) is proved.

(3) Let μ > 0 and the assumptions of (3) hold. By Remark 4.1.(1), for sufficiently small ||u||

Ψ 2 ( u ) μ Ω a 2 ( x ) c 4 | u | q 4 ( x ) + c 5 | u | q 2 ( x ) d x μ c 4 | u | ( q 4 ( x ) , a 2 ( x ) ) q 4 - + μ c 5 | u | ( q 2 ( x ) , a 2 ( x ) ) q 2 - μ c 8 | | u | | q 4 - + | | u | | q 2 - .

Since p + < q 2 - and p + < q 4 - , there exists γ > 0 and α > 0 such that J(u) - Ψ2(u) ≥ α for u Sγ. We can find λ0(μ) > 0 such that when |λ| ≤ λ0(μ), Ψ1(u) ≤ α/2 for u Sγ. So when |λ| ≤ λ0(μ), φ(u) ≥ α/2 > 0 for u Sγ. By Remark 4.1.(2), noting that 1 θ > p + > q 1 + , we can find a u0 X such that ||u0|| > γ and φ(u0) < 0. By Proposition 3.6 problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution u1 such that φ(u1) > 0.

(4) Let μ > 0 and the assumptions of (4) hold. By the conclusion (3), we know that, there exists λ0(μ) > 0 such that when 0 < λ λ0(μ), problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution u1 such that φ(u1) > 0. Let γ and α be as in the proof of (3), that is, φ(u) ≥ α/2 > 0 for u Sγ. By (O1), (O2) and the proof of (2), there exists w X such that ||w|| < γ and φ(w) < 0. It is clear that there is v1 Bγ, a minimizer of φ on Bγ. Thus v1 is a nontrivial solution of (1.1) and φ(v1) < 0.

(5) Let μ > 0, λ ∈ ℝ and the assumptions of (5) hold. By (S), we can use the nonsmooth version Fountain theorem with the antipodal action of ℤ2 to prove (5) (see Proposition 3.7). Denote

Ψ ( u ) = Ω F ( x , u ) d x = λ Ω a 1 ( x ) G 1 ( x , u ) d x + μ Ω a 2 ( x ) G 2 ( x , u ) d x .

Let βk(γ) be as in Proposition 3.5. By Proposition 3.5, for each positive integer n, there exists a positive integer k0(n) such that βk(n) ≤ 1 for all k k0(n). We may assume k0(n) < k0(n + 1) for each n. We define {γk : k = 1, 2, . . . , } by

γ k = n if  k 0 ( n ) k < k 0 ( n + 1 ) 1 if 1 k < k 0 ( 1 ) .

Note that γk → ∞ as k → ∞. Then for u Zk with ||u|| = γk we have

φ ( u ) = Ω 1 p ( x ) | u | p ( x ) d x - Ψ ( u ) 1 p + ( γ k ) p - - 1

and consequently

inf u Z k ,   u = γ k φ u as k ,

i.e., the condition (F2) of Proposition 3.7 is satisfied.

By (A), (A1), (B2) and Remark 4.1.(2), we have

φ ( u ) 1 p - | | u | | p + + c 1 | λ | ( | u | ( q 1 ( x ) , a 1 ( x ) ) ) q 1 + - c 6 μ | u | ( 1 / θ , a 2 ( x ) ) 1 / θ + c 9 .

Noting that 1 θ > p + > q 1 + and all norms on a finite dimensional vector space are equivalent each other, we can see that, for each Yk, φ(u) → - ∞ as u Yk and ||u|| → ∞. Thus for each k there exists ρk > γk such that φ(u) < 0 for u Yk Sρk, so the condition (F3) of Proposition 3.7 is satisfied. As was noted earlier, φ satisfies nonsmooth (PS) condition. By Proposition 3.7 the conclusion (5) is true.

(6) Let λ > 0, μ ∈ ℝ and the assumptions of (5) hold. Let us verify the conditions of the Nonsmooth dual Fountain theorem (see Proposition 3.8). By (S), φ is invariant on the antipodal action of ℤ2. For Ψ(u) = ∫Ω F(x, u)dx = Ψ1(u)+ Ψ2(u) let βk(1) be as in Proposition 3.5, that is

β k ( 1 ) = sup u Z k , | | u | | 1 | Ψ ( u ) | .

By Proposition 3.5, there exists a positive integer k0 such that β k ( 1 ) 1 2 p + for all k k0. Setting ρk = 1, then for k k0 and u Zk S1, we have

φ ( u ) 1 p + - 1 2 p + = 1 2 p + > 0 ,

which shows that the condition (D1) of Proposition 3.8 is satisfied.

Since X = W 0 1 , p ( x ) is the closure of C 0 ( Ω ) in W 1 , p ( x ) ( Ω ) , we may choose {Yk : k = 1, 2, . . . , }, a sequence of finite dimensional vector subspaces of X defined by (3.5), such that Y k C 0 ( Ω ) for all k. For each Yk, because all norms on Yk are equivalent each other, there is ε ∈ (0, 1) such that for every u Y k B ε , | u | min { δ 1 , δ 2 } , | u | ( q 3 ( x ) , a 1 ( x ) ) 1 and | u | ( q 4 ( x ) , a 2 ( x ) ) 1 By (O1) and (O2), for u Yk Bε we have

φ ( u ) 1 p - | | u | | p - - λ c 3 Ω a 1 ( x ) | u | q 3 ( x ) d x + | μ | c 4 Ω a 2 ( x ) | u | q 4 ( x ) d x 1 p - | | u | | p - - λ c 3 | u | ( q 3 ( x ) , a 1 ( x ) ) q 3 + + | μ | c 4 | u | ( q 4 ( x ) , a 2 ( x ) ) q 4 - .

Because q 3 + < p - < q 4 - there exists γk ∈ (0, ε) such that

b k : = max u Y k , | | u | | = γ k φ u < 0 ,

thus the condition (D2) of Proposition 3.8 is satisfied.

Because Yk Zk ≠ ∅ and γk < ρk, we have

d k : = inf u Z k , | | u | | ρ k φ u b k : = max u Y k , | | u | | = r k φ u < 0 .

On the other hand, for any u Zk with ||u|| ≤ 1 = ρk, we have φ(u) = J(u) - Ψ(u) ≥ -Ψ(u) ≥ k(1). Noting that βk → 0 as k → ∞, we obtain dk → 0, i.e., (D3) of Proposition 3.8 is satisfied.

Finally let us prove that φ satisfies nonsmooth ( PS ) c * condition for every c R. Suppose { u n j } X , n j , u n j Y n j , φ u n j c and m | Y n j u n j 0 . Similar to the process of verifying the (PS) condition in the proof of Proposition 3.3, we can get u n j u in X. Let us prove 0 ∈ ∂φ(u) below. Notice that

0 m ( u ) = m ( u ) - m ( u n j ) + m ( u n j ) = m ( u ) - m ( u n j ) + m | Y n j ( u n j ) .

Using Proposition 2.8.4, Going to limit in the right side of above equation, we have

m ( u ) 0 ,

so m(u) ≡ 0, i.e., 0 ∈ ∂φ(u), this shows that φ satisfies the nonsmooth ( PS ) c * condition for every c ∈ ℝ. So all conditions of Proposition 3.8 are satisfied and the conclusion (6) follows from Proposition 3.8. The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete.    ■

#### Remark 4.2

Theorem 4.1 includes several important special cases. In particular, in the case of the problem (1.4), i.e., in the case that

a 1 ( x ) = 1 | x | s 1 ( x ) , a 2 ( x )  =  1 | x | s 2 ( x ) ,

all conditions of Theorem 4.1 are satisfied provided (P), (A*), (A1), and (A2) hold.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors' contributions

GD conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. RM participated in the design of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful to the anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions. Research supported by the NSFC (Nos. 11061030, 10971087), 1107RJZA223 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Gansu Universities.

### References

1. Rüžzička, M: Electro-rheological Fluids: Modeling and Mathematical Theory, Springer, Berlin (2000)

2. Zhikov, VV: Averaging of functionals of the calculus of variations and elasticity theory. Math USSR Izv. 9, 33–66 (1987)

3. Antontsev, SN, Shmarev, SI: A model porous medium equation with variable exponent of nonlinearity: existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions. Nonlinear Anal. 60, 515–545 (2005)

4. Antontsev, SN, Rodrigues, JF: On stationary thermo-rheological viscous flows. Ann Univ Ferrara Sez Sci Mat. 52, 19–36 (2006). Publisher Full Text

5. Chen, Y, Levine, S, Rao, M: Variable exponent, linear growth functionals in image restoration. SIAM J Appl Math. 66(4), 1383–1406 (2006). Publisher Full Text

6. Diening, L, Hästö, P, Nekvinda, A: Open problems in variable exponent Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces. Drábek, P, Rákosník, J, FSDONA04 Proceedings, 38-58, Milovy, Czech Republic (2004). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

7. Fan, XL, Zhao, D: On the Spaces Lp(x) and Wm,p(x). J Math Anal Appl. 263, 424–446 (2001). Publisher Full Text

8. Harjulehto, P, Hästö, P: An overview of variable exponent Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces. In: Herron D (ed.) Future Trends in Geometric Function Theory, pp. 85–93. RNC Workshop, Jyväskylä (2003)

9. Samko, S: On a progress in the theory of Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent maximal and singular operators. Integr Trans Spec Funct. 16, 461–482 (2005). Publisher Full Text

10. Jikov, VV, Kozlov, SM, Oleinik, OA: Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals (Translated from the Russian by Yosifian, GA). Springer, Berlin (1994)

11. Zhikov, VV: On some variational problems. Russ J Math Phys. 5, 105–116 (1997)

12. Dai, G: Three symmetric solutions for a differential inclusion system involving the (p(x), q(x))-Laplacian in ℝN. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 1763–1771 (2009). Publisher Full Text

13. Dai, G: Infinitely many solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 70, 2297–2305 (2009). Publisher Full Text

14. Dai, G: Infinitely many solutions for a hemivariational inequality involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 186–195 (2009). Publisher Full Text

15. Dai, G: Three solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 70, 3755–3760 (2009). Publisher Full Text

16. Dai, G: Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in ℝN involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 1116–1123 (2009). Publisher Full Text

17. Fan, XL, Han, XY: Existence and multiplicity of solutions for p(x)-Laplacian equations in RN. Nonlinear Anal. 59, 173–188 (2004)

18. Fan, XL: On the sub-supersolution methods for p(x)-Laplacian equations. J Math Anal Appl. 330, 665–682 (2007). Publisher Full Text

19. Fan, XL, Zhang, QH: Existence of solutions for p(x)-Laplacian Dirichlet problems. Nonlinear Anal. 52, 1843–1852 (2003). Publisher Full Text

20. Fan, XL, Zhang, QH, Zhao, D: Eigenvalues of p(x)-Laplacian Dirichlet problem. J Math Anal Appl. 302, 306–317 (2005). Publisher Full Text

21. Fan, XL: Solutions for p(x)-Laplacian Dirichlet problems with singular coefficients. J Math Anal Appl. 312, 464–477 (2005). Publisher Full Text

22. Chang, KC: Variational methods for nondifferentiable functionals and their applications to partial differential equations. J Math Anal Appl. 80, 102–129 (1981). Publisher Full Text

23. Kourogenis, NC, Papageorgiou, NS: Nonsmooth crical point theory and nonlinear elliptic equation at .resonance. KODAI Math J. 23, 108–135 (2000). Publisher Full Text

24. Ricceri, B: A general variational principle and some of its applications. J Comput Appl Math. 113, 401–410 (2000). Publisher Full Text

25. Ricceri, B: On a three critical points theorem. Arch Math (Basel). 75, 220–226 (2000). Publisher Full Text

26. Marano, S, Motreanu, D: Infinitely many critical points of non-differentiable functions and applications to a Neumann-type problem involving the p-Laplacian. J Diff Equ. 182, 108–120 (2002). Publisher Full Text

27. Marano, SA, Motreanu, D: On a three critical points theorem for non differentiable functions and applications to nonlinear boundary value problems. Nonlinear Anal. 48, 37–52 (2002). Publisher Full Text

28. Diening, L: Riesz potential and Sobolev embeddings on generalized Lebesque and Sobolev Spaces Lp(·) and Wk,p(·) Math. Nachr. 268, 31–43 (2004). Publisher Full Text

29. Fan, XL, Shen, JS, Zhao, D: Sobolev embedding theorems for spaces Wk,p(x) (Ω). J Math Anal Appl. 262, 749–760 (2001). Publisher Full Text

30. Samko, SG: Hardy-Littlewood-Stein-Weiss inequality in the Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent. Fract Calc Appl Anal. 6(4), 421–440 (2003)

31. Kovacik, O, Rakosnik, J: On spaces Lp(x) (Ω) and Wk,p(x)(Ω). Czechoslovak Math J. 41, 592–618 (1991)

32. Clarke, FH: Optimization and Nonsmooth Analysis. Wiley, New York (1983)

33. Gasiéski, L, Papageorgiou, NS: Nonsmooth Critical Point Theory and Nonlinear Boundary Value Problems. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton (2005)

34. Zhao, JF: Structure Theory of Banach Spaces (in Chinese). Wuhan University Press, Wuhan (1991)

35. Garcia Azorero, JP, Peral Alonso, I: Hardy inequalities and some critical elliptic and parabolic problems. J Diff Equ. 144, 441–476 (1998). Publisher Full Text

36. Dai, G: Nonsmooth version of Fountain theorem and its application to a Dirichlet-type differential inclusion problem. Nonlinear Anal. 72, 1454–1461 (2010). Publisher Full Text

37. Dai, G, Wang, WT, Feng, LL: Nonsmooth version of dual Fountain theorem and its application to a differential inclusion problem. In: Acta Math Sci Ser A Chin Ed 32(2012). 1, 18–28

38. Kristály, A: Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in ℝN. J Diff Equ. 220, 511–530 (2006). Publisher Full Text