Skip to main content

Existence and multiplicity of solutions for some second-order systems on time scales with impulsive effects

Abstract

In this paper, we present a recent approach via variational methods and critical point theory to obtain the existence of solutions for the nonautonomous second-order system on time scales with impulsive effects

{ u Δ 2 ( t ) + A ( σ ( t ) ) u ( σ ( t ) ) + F ( σ ( t ) , u ( σ ( t ) ) ) = 0 , Δ -a.e.  t [ 0 , T ] T κ ; u ( 0 ) u ( T ) = u Δ ( 0 ) u Δ ( T ) = 0 , ( u i ) Δ ( t j + ) ( u i ) Δ ( t j ) = I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) , i = 1 , 2 , , N , j = 1 , 2 , , p ,

where t 0 =0< t 1 < t 2 << t p < t p + 1 =T, t j [ 0 , T ] T (j=0,1,2,,p+1), u(t)=( u 1 (t), u 2 (t),, u N (t)) R N , A(t)=[ d l m (t)] is a symmetric N×N matrix-valued function defined on [ 0 , T ] T with d l m L ( [ 0 , T ] T ,R) for all l,m=1,2,,N, I i j :RR (i=1,2,,N, j=1,2,,p) are continuous and F: [ 0 , T ] T × R N R. Finally, two examples are presented to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of our results.

MSC:34B37, 34N05.

1 Introduction

Consider the nonautonomous second-order system on time scales with impulsive effects

{ u Δ 2 ( t ) + A ( σ ( t ) ) u ( σ ( t ) ) + F ( σ ( t ) , u ( σ ( t ) ) ) = 0 , Δ -a.e.  t [ 0 , T ] T κ ; u ( 0 ) u ( T ) = u Δ ( 0 ) u Δ ( T ) = 0 , ( u i ) Δ ( t j + ) ( u i ) Δ ( t j ) = I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) , i = 1 , 2 , , N , j = 1 , 2 , , p ,
(1.1)

where t 0 =0< t 1 < t 2 << t p < t p + 1 =T, t j [ 0 , T ] T (j=0,1,2,,p+1),

u(t)=( u 1 (t), u 2 (t),, u N (t)), A(t)=[ d l m (t)] is a symmetric N×N matrix-valued function defined on [ 0 , T ] T with d l m L ( [ 0 , T ] T ,R) for all l,m=1,2,,N, I i j :RR (i=1,2,,N,j=1,2,,p) are continuous and F: [ 0 , T ] T × R N R satisfies the following assumption:

  1. (A)

    F(t,x) is Δ-measurable in t for every x R N and continuously differentiable in x for Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T , and there exist aC( R + , R + ), b σ L 1 (0,T; R + ) such that

    | F ( t , x ) | a ( | x | ) b(t), | F ( t , x ) | a ( | x | ) b(t)

for all x R N and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T , where F(t,x) denotes the gradient of F(t,x) in x.

For the sake of convenience, in the sequel, we denote Γ={1,2,3,,N}, Λ={1,2,3,,p}.

When I i j 0, iA, jB and A(t) is a zero matrix, (1.1) is the Hamiltonian system on time scales

{ u Δ 2 ( t ) + F ( σ ( t ) , u ( σ ( t ) ) ) = 0 , a.e.  t [ 0 , T ] , u ( 0 ) u ( T ) = u Δ ( 0 ) u Δ ( T ) = 0 .
(1.2)

In [1], the authors study the Sobolev’s spaces on time scales and their properties. As applications, they present a recent approach via variational methods and the critical point theory to obtain the existence of solutions for (1.2).

When I i j (t)0, iA, jB and A(t) is not a zero matrix, until now the variational structure of (1.1) has not been studied.

Problem (1.1) covers the second-order Hamiltonian system with impulsive effects (when T=R)

{ u ¨ ( t ) + A ( t ) u ( t ) + F ( t , u ( t ) ) = 0 , a.e.  t [ 0 , T ] ; u ( 0 ) u ( T ) = u ˙ ( 0 ) u ˙ ( T ) = 0 , Δ u ˙ i ( t j ) = u ˙ i ( t j + ) u ˙ i ( t j ) = I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) , i Γ , j Λ ,
(1.3)

as well as the second-order discrete Hamiltonian system (when T=Z, TN, T2)

{ u ( t + 2 ) 2 u ( t + 1 ) + u ( t ) + A ( t + 1 ) u ( t + 1 ) + F ( t + 1 , u ( t + 1 ) ) = 0 , t [ 1 , T 1 ] Z , u ( 0 ) u ( T ) = 0 , u ( T ) u ( 0 ) = u ( T + 1 ) u ( 1 ) , u i ( t j + 2 ) u i ( t j + 1 ) u i ( t j ) + u i ( t j 1 ) = I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) , i Γ , j Λ .

In [2], the authors establish some sufficient conditions on the existence of solutions of (1.3) by means of some critical point theorems when A(t)0. When TR, until now, it is unknown whether problem (1.1) has a variational structure or not.

Impulsive effects exist widely in many evolution processes in which their states are changed abruptly at certain moments of time. The theory of impulsive differential systems has been developed by numerous mathematicians (see [35]). Applications of impulsive differential equations with or without delays occur in biology, medicine, mechanics, engineering, chaos theory and so on (see [69]).

For a second-order differential equation u =f(t,u, u ), one usually considers impulses in the position u and the velocity u . However, in the motion of spacecraft, one has to consider instantaneous impulses depending on the position that result in jump discontinuities in velocity, but with no change in position (see [10]). The impulses only on the velocity occur also in impulsive mechanics (see [11]). An impulsive problem with impulses in the derivative only is considered in [12].

The study of dynamical systems on time scales is now an active area of research. One of the reasons for this is the fact that the study on time scales unifies the study of both discrete and continuous processes, besides many others. The pioneering works in this direction are Refs. [1317]. The theory of time scales was initiated by Stefan Hilger in his Ph.D. thesis in 1988, providing a rich theory that unifies and extends discrete and continuous analysis [18, 19]. The time scales calculus has a tremendous potential for applications in some mathematical models of real processes and phenomena studied in physics, chemical technology, population dynamics, biotechnology and economics, neural networks and social sciences (see [16]). For example, it can model insect populations that are continuous while in season (and may follow a difference scheme with variable step-size), die out in winter, while their eggs are incubating or dormant, and then hatch in a new season, giving rise to a nonoverlapping population.

There have been many approaches to study solutions of differential equations on time scales, such as the method of lower and upper solutions, fixed-point theory, coincidence degree theory and so on (see [1, 2029]). In [24], authors used the fixed point theorem of strict-set-contraction to study the existence of positive periodic solutions for functional differential equations with impulse effects on time scales. However, the study of the existence and multiplicity of solutions for differential equations on time scales using the variational method has received considerably less attention (see, for example, [1, 29]). The variational method is, to the best of our knowledge, novel and it may open a new approach to deal with nonlinear problems, with some type of discontinuities such as impulses.

Motivated by the above, we research the existence of variational construction for problem (1.1) in an appropriate space of functions and study the existence of solutions for (1.1) by some critical point theorems in this paper. All these results are new.

2 Preliminaries and statements

In this section, we present some fundamental definitions and results from the calculus on time scales and Sobolev’s spaces on time scales that will be required below. These are a generalization to R n of definitions and results found in [17].

Definition 2.1 ([[17], Definition 1.1])

Let T be a time scale. For tT, the forward jump operator σ:TT is defined by

σ(t)=inf{sT,s>t}for all tT,

while the backward jump operator ρ:TT is defined by

ρ(t)=sup{sT,s<t}for all tT

(supplemented by inf=supT and sup=infT, where denotes the empty set). A point tT is called right-scattered, left-scattered, if σ(t)>t, ρ(t)<t hold, respectively. Points that are right-scattered and left-scattered at the same time are called isolated. Also, if t<supT and σ(t)=t, then t is called right-dense, and if t>infT and ρ(t)=t, then t is called left-dense. Points that are right-dense and left-dense at the same time are called dense. The set T κ which is derived from the time scale T as follows. If T has a left-scattered maximum m, then T κ =T{m}; otherwise, T κ =T.

When a,bT, a<b, we denote the intervals [ a , b ] T , [ a , b ) T and ( a , b ] T in T by

[ a , b ] T =[a,b]T, [ a , b ) T =[a,b)T, ( a , b ] T =(a,b]T,

respectively. Note that [ a , b ] T κ = [ a , b ] T if b is left-dense and [ a , b ] T κ = [ a , b ) T = [ a , ρ ( b ) ] T if b is left-scattered. We denote [ a , b ] T κ 2 = ( [ a , b ] T κ ) κ , therefore [ a , b ] T κ 2 = [ a , b ] T if b is left-dense and [ a , b ] T κ 2 = [ a , ρ ( b ) ] T κ if b is left-scattered.

Definition 2.2 ([[17], Definition 1.10])

Assume that f:TR is a function and let t T κ . Then we define f Δ (t) to be the number (provided it exists) with the property that given any ϵ>0, there is a neighborhood U of t (i.e., U=(tδ,t+δ)T for some δ>0) such that

| [ f ( σ ( t ) ) f ( s ) ] f Δ ( t ) [ σ ( t ) s ] | ϵ | σ ( t ) s | for all sU.

We call f Δ (t) the delta (or Hilger) derivative of f at t. The function f is delta (or Hilger) differentiable on T κ provided f Δ (t) exists for all t T κ . The function f Δ : T κ R is then called the delta derivative of f on T κ .

Definition 2.3 ([[1], Definition 2.3])

Assume that f:T R N is a function,

f(t)= ( f 1 ( t ) , f 2 ( t ) , , f N ( t ) ) ,

and let t T κ . Then we define f Δ (t)=( f 1 Δ (t), f 2 Δ (t),, f N Δ (t)) (provided it exists). We call f Δ (t) the delta (or Hilger) derivative of f at t. The function f is delta (or Hilger) differentiable provided f Δ (t) exists for all t T κ . The function f Δ : T κ R N is then called the delta derivative of f on T κ .

Definition 2.4 ([[17], Definition 2.7])

For a function f:TR, we will talk about the second derivative f Δ 2 provided f Δ is differentiable on T κ 2 = ( T κ ) κ with derivative f Δ 2 = ( f Δ ) Δ : T κ 2 R.

Definition 2.5 ([[1], Definition 2.5])

For a function f:T R N , we will talk about the second derivative f Δ 2 provided f Δ is differentiable on T κ 2 = ( T κ ) κ with derivative f Δ 2 = ( f Δ ) Δ : T κ 2 R N .

The Δ-measure μ Δ and Δ-integration are defined as those in [26].

Definition 2.6 ([[1], Definition 2.7])

Assume that f:T R N is a function, f(t)=( f 1 (t), f 2 (t),, f N (t)) and let A be a Δ-measurable subset of T. f is integrable on A if and only if f i (i=1,2,,N) are integrable on A, and A f(t)Δt=( A f 1 (t)Δt, A f 2 (t)Δt,, A f N (t)Δt).

Definition 2.7 ([[17], Definition 2.3])

Let BT. B is called a Δ-null set if μ Δ (B)=0. Say that a property P holds Δ-almost everywhere (Δ-a.e.) on B, or for Δ-almost all (Δ-a.a.) tB if there is a Δ-null set E 0 B such that P holds for all tB E 0 .

For pR, p1, we set the space

L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ) = { u : [ 0 , T ) T R N : [ 0 , T ) T | f ( t ) | p Δ t < + }

with the norm

f L Δ p = ( [ 0 , T ) T | f ( t ) | p Δ t ) 1 p .

We have the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1 ([[1], Theorem 2.1])

Let pR be such that p1. Then the space L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ) is a Banach space together with the norm L Δ p . Moreover, L Δ 2 ( [ a , b ) T , R N ) is a Hilbert space together with the inner product given for every (f,g) L Δ p ( [ a , b ) T , R N )× L Δ p ( [ a , b ) T , R N ) by

f , g L Δ 2 = [ a , b ) T ( f ( t ) , g ( t ) ) Δt,

where (,) denotes the inner product in R N .

Definition 2.8 ([[1], Definition 2.11])

A function f: [ a , b ] T R N ,f(t)=( f 1 (t), f 2 (t),, f N (t)). We say that f is absolutely continuous on [ a , b ] T (i.e., fAC( [ a , b ] T , R N )) if for every ϵ>0, there exists δ>0 such that if { [ a k , b k ) T } k = 1 n is a finite pairwise disjoint family of subintervals of [ a , b ] T satisfying k = 1 n ( b k a k )<δ, then k = 1 n |f( b k )f( a k )|<ϵ.

Now, we recall the Sobolev space W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) on [ 0 , T ] T defined in [1]. For the sake of convenience, in the sequel we let u σ (t)=u(σ(t)).

Definition 2.9 ([[1], Definition 2.12])

Let pR be such that p>1 and u: [ 0 , T ] T R N . We say that u W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) if and only if u L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ) and there exists g: [ 0 , T ] T κ R N such g L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ) and

[ 0 , T ) T ( u ( t ) , ϕ Δ ( t ) ) Δt= [ 0 , T ) T ( g ( t ) , ϕ σ ( t ) ) Δt,ϕ C T , r d 1 ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) .
(2.1)

For pR, p>1, we denote

V Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) = { x A C ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) : x Δ L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ) , x ( 0 ) = x ( T ) } .

It follows from Remark 2.2 in [1] that

V Δ 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) W Δ 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N )

is true for every pR with p>1. These two sets are, as a class of functions, equivalent. It is the characterization of functions in W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) in terms of functions in V Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) too. That is the following theorem.

Theorem 2.2 ([[1], Theorem 2.5])

Suppose that u W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) for some pR with p>1, and that (2.1) holds for g L Δ p ( [ 0 , T ) T , R N ). Then there exists a unique function x V Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) such that the equalities

x=u, x Δ =gΔ -a.e. on [ 0 , T ) T
(2.2)

are satisfied and

[ 0 , T ) T g(t)Δt=0.
(2.3)

By identifying u W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) with its absolutely continuous representative x V Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) for which (2.2) holds, the set W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) can be endowed with the structure of a Banach space. That is the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3 ([[25], Theorem 2.21])

Assume pR and p>1. The set W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) is a Banach space together with the norm defined as

(2.4)

Moreover, the set H Δ , T 1 = W Δ , T 1 , 2 ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) is a Hilbert space together with the inner product

u , v H Δ , T 1 = [ 0 , T ) T ( u σ ( t ) , v σ ( t ) ) Δt+ [ 0 , T ) T ( u Δ ( t ) , v Δ ( t ) ) Δtu,v H Δ , T 1 .

The Banach space W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) has some important properties.

Theorem 2.4 ([[25], Theorem 2.23])

There exists C 1 >0 such that the inequality

u C 1 u H Δ , T 1
(2.5)

holds for all u H Δ , T 1 , where u = max t [ 0 , T ] T |u(t)|.

Moreover, if [ 0 , T ) T u(t)Δt=0, then

u C 1 u Δ L Δ 2 .

Theorem 2.5 ([[25], Theorem 2.25])

If the sequence { u k } k N W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) converges weakly to u in W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ), then { u k } k N converges strongly in C( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) to u.

Theorem 2.6 ([[25], Theorem 2.27])

Let L: [ 0 , T ] T × R N × R N R,(t,x,y)L(t,x,y) be Δ-measurable in t for each (x,y) R N × R N and continuously differentiable in (x,y) for Δ-almost every t [ 0 , T ] T . If there exist aC( R + , R + ), b L Δ 1 ( [ 0 , T ] T , R + ) and c L Δ q ( [ 0 , T ] T , R + ) (1<q<+) such that for Δ-almost t [ 0 , T ] T and every (x,y) R N × R N , one has

(2.6)

where 1 p + 1 q =1, then the functional Φ: W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N )R defined as

Φ(u)= [ 0 , T ) T L ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) , u Δ ( t ) ) Δt

is continuously differentiable on W Δ , T 1 , p ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) and

Φ ( u ) , v = [ 0 , T ) T [ ( L x ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) , u Δ ( t ) ) , v σ ( t ) ) + ( L y ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) , u Δ ( t ) ) , v Δ ( t ) ) ] Δ t .
(2.7)

3 Variational setting

In this section, we recall some basic facts which will be used in the proofs of our main results. In order to apply the critical point theory, we make a variational structure. From this variational structure, we can reduce the problem of finding solutions of (1.1) to the one of seeking the critical points of a corresponding functional.

If u H Δ , T 1 , by identifying u H Δ , T 1 with its absolutely continuous representative x V Δ , T 1 , 2 ( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) for which (2.2) holds, then u is absolutely continuous and u ˙ L 2 ( [ 0 , T ) T ; R N ). In this case, u Δ ( t + ) u Δ ( t )=0 may not hold for some t ( 0 , T ) T . This leads to impulsive effects.

Take v H Δ , T 1 and multiply the two sides of the equality

u Δ 2 (t)+A ( σ ( t ) ) u ( σ ( t ) ) +F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) =0

by v σ and integrate on [ 0 , T ) T , then we have

[ 0 , T ) T [ u Δ 2 ( t ) + A ( σ ( t ) ) u ( σ ( t ) ) + F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) ] v σ (t)Δt=0.
(3.1)

Moreover, combining u Δ (0) u Δ (T)=0, one has

Combining (3.1), we have

Considering the above, we introduce the following concept solution for problem (1.1).

Definition 3.1 We say that a function u H Δ , T 1 is a weak solution of problem (1.1) if the identity

holds for any v H Δ , T 1 .

Consider the functional φ: H Δ , T 1 R defined by

φ ( u ) = 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t + J ( u ) = ψ ( u ) + ϕ ( u ) ,
(3.2)

where

and

ϕ(u)= j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j (t)dt.

Lemma 3.1 The functional φ is continuously differentiable on H Δ , T 1 and

φ ( u ) , v = [ 0 , T ) T ( u Δ ( t ) , v Δ ( t ) ) Δ t + j = 1 p i = 1 N I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) v i ( t j ) [ 0 , T ) T [ ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , v σ ( t ) ) ( F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) , v σ ( t ) ) ] Δ t .
(3.3)

Proof Set L(t,x,y)= 1 2 | y | 2 1 2 (A(t)x,x)F(t,x) for all x,y R N and t [ 0 , T ] T . Then L(t,x,y) satisfies all assumptions of Theorem 2.6. Hence, by Theorem 2.6, we know that the functional ψ is continuously differentiable on H Δ , T 1 and

ψ ( u ) , v = [ 0 , T ) T [ ( u Δ ( t ) , v Δ ( t ) ) ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , v σ ( t ) ) ( F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) , v σ ( t ) ) ] Δt

for all u,v H Δ , T 1 .

On the other hand, by the continuity of I i j , iΓ, jΛ, one has that ϕ C 1 ( H Δ , T 1 ,R) and

ϕ ( u ) , v = j = 1 p i = 1 N I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) v i ( t j )

for all u,v H Δ , T 1 . Thus, φ is continuously differentiable on H Δ , T 1 and (3.3) holds. □

By Definition 3.1 and Lemma 3.1, the weak solutions of problem (1.1) correspond to the critical points of φ.

Moreover, we need more preliminaries. For any u H Δ , T 1 , let

q(u)= 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T [ | u σ ( t ) | 2 ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) ] Δt.

We see that

q ( u ) = 1 2 u 2 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( ( A σ ( t ) + I N × N ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t = 1 2 ( I K ) u , u ,

where K: H Δ , T 1 H Δ , T 1 is the bounded self-adjoint linear operator defined, using the Riesz representation theorem, by

Ku,v= [ 0 , T ) T ( ( A σ ( t ) + I N × N ) u σ ( t ) , v σ ( t ) ) Δt,u,v H Δ , T 1 ,

I N × N and I denote an N×N identity matrix and an identity operator, respectively. By (3.2), φ(u) can be rewritten as

φ ( u ) = q ( u ) + ϕ ( u ) + J ( u ) = 1 2 ( I K ) u , u + ϕ ( u ) + J ( u ) .
(3.4)

The compact imbedding of H Δ , T 1 into C( [ 0 , T ] T , R N ) implies that K is compact. By classical spectral theory, we can decompose H Δ , T 1 into the orthogonal sum of invariant subspaces for IK

H Δ , T 1 = H H 0 H + ,

where H 0 =ker(IK) and H , H + are such that, for some δ>0,

(3.5)
(3.6)

Remark 3.1 K has only finitely many eigenvalues λ i with λ i >1 since K is compact on H T 1 . Hence H is finite dimensional. Notice that IK is a compact perturbation of the self-adjoint operator I. By a well-known theorem, we know that 0 is not in the essential spectrum of IK. Hence, H 0 is a finite dimensional space too.

To prove our main results, we need the following definitions and theorems.

Definition 3.2 ([[30], P 81 ])

Let X be a real Banach space and I C 1 (X,R). I is said to be satisfying (PS) condition on X if any sequence { x n }X for which I( x n ) is bounded and I ( x n )0 as n, possesses a convergent subsequence in X.

Firstly, we state the local linking theorem.

Let X be a real Banach space with a direct decomposition X= X 1 X 2 . Consider two sequences of a subspace

X 0 1 X 1 1 X 1 , X 0 2 X 1 2 X 2

such that

dim X n 1 <+,dim X n 2 <+,nN

and

X 1 = n N X n 1 ¯ , X 2 = n N X n 2 ¯ .

For every multi-index α=( α 1 , α 2 ) N 2 , we denote by X α the space X α 1 X α 2 . We say αβ α 1 β 1 , α 2 β 2 . A sequence ( α n ) N 2 is admissible if, for every α N 2 , there is m 0 N such that n m 0 α n α.

Definition 3.3 ([[31], Definition 2.2])

Let I C 1 (X,R). The functional I satisfies the ( C ) condition if every sequence ( u α n ) such that α n is admissible and

u α n X α n ,sup | I ( u α n ) | <, ( 1 + u α n ) I ( u α n )0

contains a subsequence which converges to a critical point of I.

Theorem 3.1 [[31], Theorem 2.2]

Suppose that I C 1 (X,R) satisfies the following assumptions:

(I1) X 1 {0} and I has a local linking at 0 with respect to ( X 1 , X 2 ); that is, for some M>0,

(I2) I satisfies ( C ) condition.

(I3) I maps bounded sets into bounded sets.

(I4) For every nN, I(u) as u, u X n 1 X 2 .

Then I has at least two critical points.

Remark 3.2 Since I C 1 (X,R), by the condition (I1) of Theorem 3.1, 0 is the critical point of I. Thus, under the conditions of Theorem 3.1, I has at least one nontrivial critical point.

Secondly, we state another three critical point theorems.

Theorem 3.2 ([[32], Theorem 5.29])

Let E be a Hilbert space with E= E 1 E 2 and E 2 = E 1 . Suppose I C 1 (E,R), satisfies (PS) condition, and

(I5) I(u)= 1 2 Lu,u+b(u), where Lu= L 1 P 1 u+ L 2 P 2 u and L κ : E κ E κ is bounded and self-adjoint, κ=1,2,

(I6) b is compact, and

(I7) there exist a subspace E ˜ E and sets SE, Q E ˜ and constants α>ω such that

  1. (i)

    S E 1 and I | S α,

  2. (ii)

    Q is bounded and I | Q ω,

  3. (iii)

    S and ∂Q link.

Then I possesses a critical value cα.

Theorem 3.3 ([[32], Theorem 9.12])

Let E be a Banach space. Let I C 1 (E,R) be an even functional which satisfies the (PS) condition and I(0)=0. If E=VW, where V is finite dimensional, and I satisfies

(I8) there are constants ρ,α>0 such that I | B ρ W α, where B ρ ={xE:x<ρ},

(I9) for each finite dimensional subspace E ˜ E, there is an R=R( E ˜ ) such that I0 on E ˜ B R ( E ˜ ) ,

then I possesses an unbounded sequence of critical values.

In order to state another critical point theorem, we need the following notions. Let X and Y be Banach spaces with X being separable and reflexive, and set E=XY. Let S X be a dense subset. For each sS, there is a semi-norm on E defined by

p s :ER, p s (u)= | s ( x ) | +yfor u=x+yXY.

We denote by T S the topology on E induced by a semi-norm family { p s }, and let w and w denote the weak-topology and weak*-topology, respectively.

For a functional Φ C 1 (E,R), we write Φ a ={uE:Φ(u)a}. Recall that Φ is said to be weak sequentially continuous if, for any u k u in E, one has lim k Φ ( u k )v Φ (u)v for each vE, i.e., Φ :(E,w)( E , w ) is sequentially continuous. For cR, we say that Φ satisfies the ( C ) c condition if any sequence { u k }E such that Φ( u k )c and (1+ u k ) Φ ( u k )0 as k contains a convergent subsequence.

Suppose that

( Φ 0 ) for any cR, Φ c is T S -closed, and Φ :( Φ c , T S )( E , w ) is continuous;

( Φ 1 ) there exists ρ>0 such that κ:=infΦ( B ρ Y)>0, where

B ρ = { u E : u < ρ } ;

( Φ 2 ) there exist a finite dimensional subspace Y 0 Y and R>ρ such that c ¯ :=supΦ( E 0 )< and supΦ( E 0 S 0 )<infΦ( B ρ Y), where

E 0 :=X Y 0 ,and S 0 = { u E 0 : u R } .

Theorem 3.4 ([33])

Assume that Φ is even and ( Φ 0 )-( Φ 2 ) are satisfied. Then Φ has at least m=dim Y 0 pairs of critical points with critical values less than or equal to c ¯ provided Φ satisfies the ( C ) c condition for all c[κ, c ¯ ].

Remark 3.3 In our applications, we take S= X so that T S is the product topology on E=XY given by the weak topology on X and the strong topology on Y.

4 Main results

Lemma 4.1 ϕ is compact on H Δ , T 1 .

Proof Let { u k } H Δ , T 1 be any bounded sequence. Since H Δ , T 1 is a Hilbert space, we can assume that u k u. Theorem 2.5 implies that u k u 0. By (2.5), we have

The continuity of I i j and this imply that ϕ ( u k ) ϕ (u) in H Δ , T 1 . The proof is complete. □

First of all, we give two existence results.

Theorem 4.1 Suppose that (A) and the following conditions are satisfied.

(F1) lim | x | F ( t , x ) | x | 2 =+ uniformly for Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T ,

(F2) lim | x | 0 F ( t , x ) | x | 2 =0 uniformly for Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T ,

(F3) there exist λ>2 and β>λ2 such that

lim sup | x | F ( t , x ) | x | λ < uniformly for Δ -a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T

and

lim inf | x | ( F ( t , x ) , x ) 2 F ( t , x ) | x | β >0 uniformly for Δ -a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T ,

(F4) there exists r>0 such that

F(t,x)0,|x|r, and Δ -a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T ,

(F5) there exist a i j , b i j >0 and ξ i j [0,1) such that

| I i j ( t ) | a i j + b i j | t | ξ i j for every tR,iΓ,jΛ,

(F6) 0 t I i j (s)ds0 for every tR, iΓ, jΛ,

(F7) there exists ζ i j >0 such that

2 0 t I i j (s)ds I i j (t)t0 for all iΓ,jΛ and |t| ζ i j ,

and

lim t 0 I i j ( t ) t =0 for all iΓ,jΛ.

Then problem (1.1) has at least two weak solutions. The one is a nontrivial weak solution, the other is a trivial weak solution.

Proof By Lemma 3.1, φ C 1 (X,R). Set X= H Δ , T 1 , X 1 = H + with ( e n ) n 1 being its Hilbertian basis, X 2 = H H 0 and define

X n 1 =span{ e 1 , e 2 ,, e n },nN, X n 2 = X 2 ,nN.

Then we have

X 0 1 X 1 1 X 1 , X 0 2 X 1 2 X 2 , X 1 = n N X n 1 ¯ , X 2 = n N X n 2 ¯

and

dim X n 1 <+,dim X n 2 <+,nN.

We divide our proof into four parts in order to show Theorem 4.1.

Firstly, we show that φ satisfies the ( C ) condition.

Let { u α n } be a sequence in H Δ , T 1 such that α n is admissible and

u α n X α n ,sup | φ ( u α n ) | <+, ( 1 + u α n ) φ ( u α n )0,

then there exists a constant C 2 >0 such that

| φ ( u α n ) | C 2 , ( 1 + u α n ) φ ( u α n ) C 2
(4.1)

for all large n. On the other hand, by (F3), there are constants C 3 >0 and ρ 1 >0 such that

F(t,x) C 3 | x | λ
(4.2)

for all |x| ρ 1 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . By (A) one has

| F ( t , x ) | max s [ 0 , ρ 1 ] a(s)b(t)
(4.3)

for all |x| ρ 1 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . It follows from (4.2) and (4.3) that

| F ( t , x ) | max s [ 0 , ρ 1 ] a(s)b(t)+ C 3 | x | λ
(4.4)

for all x R N and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . Since d l m L ([0,T]) for all l,m=1,2,,N, there exists a constant C 4 1 such that

| [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t | C 4 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δt,u H Δ , T 1 .
(4.5)

From (F5) and (2.5), we have that

| ϕ ( u ) | j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 | u i ( t j ) | ( a i j + b i j | t | ξ i j ) d t a ¯ p N u + b ¯ j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 a ¯ p N C 1 u + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1
(4.6)

for all u H Δ , T 1 , where a ¯ = max i Γ , j Λ { a i j }, b ¯ = max i Γ , j Λ { b i j }. Combining (4.4), (4.5), (4.6) and Hölder’s inequality, we have

1 2 u α n 2 = φ ( u α n ) ϕ ( u α n ) + 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) u α n σ ( t ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) Δ t J ( u α n ) C 2 + a ¯ p N C 1 u α n + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u α n ξ i j + 1 + C 4 [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + C 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | λ Δ t + max s [ 0 , ρ 1 ] a ( s ) [ 0 , T ) T b σ ( t ) Δ t C 2 + a ¯ p N C 1 u α n + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u α n ξ i j + 1 + C 4 T λ 2 λ ( [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | λ Δ t ) 2 λ + C 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | λ Δ t + C 5
(4.7)

for all large n, where C 5 = max s [ 0 , ρ 1 ] a(s) [ 0 , T ) T b σ (t)Δt. On the other hand, by (F3), there exist C 6 >0 and ρ 2 >0 such that

( F ( t , x ) , x ) 2F(t,x) C 6 | x | β
(4.8)

for all |x| ρ 2 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . By (A),

| ( F ( t , x ) , x ) 2 F ( t , x ) | C 7 b(t)
(4.9)

for all |x| ρ 2 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T , where C 7 =(2+ ρ 2 ) max s [ 0 , ρ 2 ] a(s). Combining (4.8) and (4.9), one has

( F ( t , x ) , x ) 2F(t,x) C 6 | x | β C 6 ρ 2 β C 7 b(t)
(4.10)

for all x R N and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . According to (F7), there exists C 8 >0 such that

2 0 t I i j (s)ds I i j (t)t C 8 for all iΓ,jΛ and tR.
(4.11)

Thus, by (4.1), (4.10) and (4.11), we obtain

3 C 2 2 φ ( u α n ) φ ( u α n ) , u α n = 2 ϕ ( u α n ) ϕ ( u α n ) , u α n + [ 0 , T ) T [ ( F ( σ ( t ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) 2 F ( σ ( t ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) ] Δ t = j = 1 p i = 1 N ( 2 0 u α n i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t I i j ( u α n i ( t j ) ) u α n i ( t j ) ) + [ 0 , T ) T [ ( F ( σ ( t ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) 2 F ( σ ( t ) , u α n σ ( t ) ) ] Δ t p N C 8 + C 6 [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ | β Δ t C 6 ρ 2 β T C 7 [ 0 , T ) T b σ ( t ) Δ t
(4.12)

for all large n. From (4.12), [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ | β Δt is bounded. If β>λ, by Hölder’s inequality, we have

[ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | λ Δt T β λ β ( [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | β Δ t ) λ β .
(4.13)

Since ξ i j [0,1) for all iΓ, jΛ, by (4.7) and (4.13), { u α n } is bounded in H Δ , T 1 . If βλ, by (2.5), we obtain

[ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | λ Δ t = [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | β | u α n σ ( t ) | λ β Δ t u α n λ β [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | β Δ t C 1 λ β u α n λ β [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) | β Δ t .
(4.14)

Since ξ i j [0,1), λβ<2, by (4.7) and (4.14), { u α n } is also bounded in H Δ , T 1 . Hence, { u α n } is also bounded in H Δ , T 1 . Going if necessary to a subsequence, we can assume that u α n u in H Δ , T 1 . From Theorem 2.5, we have u α n u 0 and [ 0 , T ) T | u α n σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) | 2 Δt0. Since

This implies [ 0 , T ) T | u α n Δ ( t ) u Δ ( t ) | 2 Δt0, and hence u α n u0. Therefore, u α n u in H Δ , T 1 . Hence φ satisfies the ( C ) condition.

Secondly, we show that φ maps bounded sets into bounded sets.

It follows from (3.2), (4.4), (4.5) and (4.6) that

| φ ( u ) | = 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t + J ( u ) 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + C 4 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + a ¯ p N C 1 u + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 + C 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | λ Δ t + max s [ 0 , ρ 1 ] a ( s ) [ 0 , T ) T b σ ( t ) Δ t 1 2 C 4 u 2 + a ¯ p N C 1 u + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 + C 3 T u λ + C 5 1 2 C 4 u 2 + a ¯ p N C 1 u + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 + C 3 T C 1 λ u λ + C 5

for all u H Δ , T 1 . Thus, φ maps bounded sets into bounded sets.

Thirdly, we claim that φ has a local linking at 0 with respect to ( X 1 , X 2 ).

Applying (F2), for ϵ 1 = δ 4 , there exists ρ 3 >0 such that

| F ( t , x ) | ϵ 1 | x | 2
(4.15)

for all |x| ρ 3 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . By (F7), for ϵ 2 = δ 4 p N C 1 , there exists ρ 4 >0 such that

| I i j ( t ) | ϵ 2 |t|,|t| ρ 4 ,iΓ,jΛ.
(4.16)

Let ρ 5 =min{ ρ 3 , ρ 4 }. For u X 1 with u r 1 ρ 5 C 1 , by (2.5), (3.2), (3.6), (4.15) and (4.16), we have

φ ( u ) = q ( u ) + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 | u i ( t j ) | | I i j ( t ) | d t ϵ 1 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 | u i ( t j ) | ϵ 2 | t | d t ϵ 1 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 ϵ 2 j = 1 p i = 1 N u 2 ϵ 1 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 ϵ 2 p N C 1 u 2 ϵ 1 u 2 δ u 2 δ 4 u 2 δ 4 u 2 = δ 2 u 2 .

This implies that

φ(u)0,u X 1  with u r 1 .

On the other hand, it follows from (F6) that

ϕ(u)0
(4.17)

for all u H Δ , T 1 . Let u= u + u 0 X 2 satisfy u r 2 r C 1 . Using (F4), (2.5), (3.2), (3.5) and (4.17), we obtain

φ ( u ) = q ( u ) + ϕ ( u ) [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 .

This implies that

φ(u)0,u X 2  with u r 2 .

Let M=min{ r 1 , r 2 }. Then φ satisfies the condition ( I 1 ) of Theorem 3.1.

Finally, we claim that for every nN,

φ(u)as u,u X n 1 X 2 .

For given nN, since X n 1 X 2 is a finite dimensional space, there exists C 9 >0 such that

u C 9 u L 2 ,u X n 1 X 2 .
(4.18)

By (F1), there exists ρ 6 >0 such that

F(t,x) C 9 2 ( C 4 +δ) | x | 2
(4.19)

for all |x| ρ 6 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . From (A), we get

| F ( t , x ) | max s [ 0 , ρ 6 ] a(s)b(t)
(4.20)

for all |x| ρ 6 and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T . Equations (4.19) and (4.20) imply that

F(t,x) C 9 2 ( C 4 +δ) | x | 2 C 10 max s [ 0 , ρ 6 ] a(s)b(t)
(4.21)

for all x R N and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T , where C 10 = C 9 2 ( C 4 +δ) ρ 6 2 . Using (3.2), (3.6), (4.5), (4.17), (4.18) and (4.21), we have, for u= u + + u 0 + u X n 1 X 2 = X n 1 H 0 H ,

φ ( u ) = 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) u σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 + 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | ( u + ) Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A σ ( t ) ( u + ) σ ( t ) , ( u + ) σ ( t ) ) Δ t [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 + 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | ( u + ) Δ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + C 4 2 [ 0 , T ) T | ( u + ) σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 + C 4 2 u + 2 C 9 2 ( C 4 + δ ) u σ L 2 2 + C 10 T + max s [ 0 , ρ 6 ] a ( s ) [ 0 , T ) T b σ ( t ) Δ t δ u 2 + C 4 u + 2 ( C 4 + δ ) u 2 + C 10 T + C 11 = δ u 2 + C 4 u + 2 ( C 4 + δ ) u + + u 0 + u 2 + C 10 T + C 11 δ u 2 + C 4 u + 2 ( C 4 + δ ) u + 2 δ u 0 + u 2 + C 10 T + C 11 δ u 2 + C 4 u + 2 ( C 4 + δ ) u + 2 δ u 0 2 + C 10 T + C 11 = δ u 2 + C 10 T + C 11 ,

where C 11 = max s [ 0 , ρ 6 ] a(s) [ 0 , T ) T b σ (t)Δt. Hence, for every nN, φ(u) as u and X n 1 X 2 .

Thus, by Theorem 3.1, problem (1.1) has at least one nontrivial weak solution. The proof is complete. □

Example 4.1 Let T=R, T= π 2 , N=1, t 1 = π 4 . Consider the second-order Hamiltonian system with impulsive effects

{ u ¨ ( t ) + A ( t ) u ( t ) + F ( t , x ) = 0 , a.e.  t [ 0 , π 2 ] ; u ( 0 ) u ( π 2 ) = u ˙ ( 0 ) u ˙ ( π 2 ) = 0 , Δ u ˙ ( t 1 ) = u ˙ ( t 1 + ) u ˙ ( t 1 ) = I ( u ( t 1 ) ) ,
(4.22)

where A(t)=1,

F(t,x)={ | x | 4 , | x | 5 , 625 5 3 2 x 1875 2 5 3 2 , 3 2 < x < 5 , 0 , | x | 3 2 , 625 3 2 5 x + 1875 2 3 2 5 , 5 x < 3 2

for all xR and t[0, π 2 ],

I(t)={ 0 , t 4 , 6 ( t 4 ) 3 , 3 t < 4 , 6 t 12 , 1 < t < 3 , 6 t 3 , | t | 1 , 6 t + 12 , 3 < t < 1 , 6 ( t + 4 ) 3 , 4 < t 3 , 0 , t 4 ,

then all conditions of Theorem 4.1 hold. According to Theorem 4.1, problem (4.22) has at least one nontrivial weak solution. In fact,

u(t)={ 3 2 cos t , t [ 0 , π 4 ] ; 3 2 sin t , t [ π 4 , π 2 ]

is the solution of problem (4.22).

Theorem 4.2 Assume that (A), (F5), (F6), (F7) and the following conditions are satisfied.

(F8) lim sup | x | 0 F ( t , x ) | x | 2 0 uniformly for Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T ,

(F9) there exist constants μ>2 and r 3 0 such that (F(t,x),x)μF(t,x)>0 for all t [ 0 , T ] T and |x| r 3 ,

(F10) F(t,x)0 for all x R N and Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T .

Then problem (1.1) has at least one nontrivial weak solution.

Proof Set E 1 = H + , E 2 = H H 0 and E= H Δ , T 1 . Then E is a real Hilbert space, E= E 1 E 2 , E 2 = E 1 and dim( E 2 )<+.

Firstly, we prove that φ satisfies the (PS) condition. Indeed, let { u k } H Δ , T 1 be a sequence such that |φ( u k )| C 12 and φ ( u k )0 as k. As the proof of Theorem 4.1, it suffices to show that { u k } is bounded in H Δ , T 1 . By (F9) there exist positive constants C 13 , C 14 such that

F(t,x) C 13 | x | μ C 14 ,t [ 0 , T ] T ,x R n
(4.23)

(see [34]). By (F9), (4.11) and (4.23), we have

(4.24)

for large k, where C 15 =( r 3 +μ) max s [ 0 , r 3 ] a(s) [ 0 , T ) T b σ (t)Δt. Equation (4.24) implies that there exists C 16 >0 such that

[ 0 , T ) T | u k σ ( t ) | μ Δt C 16 ( 1 + u k ) .
(4.25)

Combining (3.2), (4.6), (4.11) and (4.25), we obtain

(4.26)

for large k. Since μ>2, ξ i j [0,1), by (4.26), { u k } is bounded in H Δ , T 1 .

For any small ϵ 3 = δ 2 , by (F8) we know that there is a ρ 7 >0 such that

F(t,x) ϵ 3 | x | 2 ,for |x|< ρ 7 Δ-a.e. t [ 0 , T ] T .
(4.27)

By (F7), for ϵ 4 = δ 8 p N C 1 , there exists ρ 8 >0 such that

| I i j ( t ) | ϵ 4 |t|,|t| ρ 8 ,iΓ,jΛ.
(4.28)

Let ρ 9 = 1 2 min{ ρ 7 , ρ 8 }. For u E 1 with u r 1 ρ 9 C 1 , by (2.5), (3.2), (3.6), (4.27) and (4.28), we have

φ ( u ) = q ( u ) + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t [ 0 , T ) T F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) Δ t δ u 2 j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 | u i ( t j ) | | I i j ( t ) | d t ϵ 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 | u i ( t j ) | ϵ 4 | t | d t ϵ 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 ϵ 4 j = 1 p i = 1 N u 2 ϵ 3 [ 0 , T ) T | u σ ( t ) | 2 Δ t δ u 2 ϵ 4 p N C 1 u 2 ϵ 3 u 2 δ u 2 δ 8 u 2 δ 2 | u 2 = 3 δ 8 u 2 .

Consequently,

φ(u) 3 δ ρ 9 8 σ>0,u E 1  with u= ρ 9 .
(4.29)

Moreover, we can prove that J is compact (see [[35], p.1437]). It follows from (3.4), (4.29) and Lemma 4.1 that φ satisfies the conditions (I5), (I6) and (I7)(i) with S= B ρ E 1 of Theorem 3.2.

Set e E 1 B 1 , r 4 > ρ 9 , r 5 >0, Q={se:s(0, r 4 )}( B r 5 E 2 ) and E ˜ =span{e} E 2 . Then S and ∂Q link, where B r 5 ={uE:u r 5 }. Set

Q 1 = { u E 2 : u r 5 } , Q 2 = { r 4 e + u : u E 2 ,  and  u r 5 }

and

Q 3 = { s e + u : s [ 0 , r 4 ] , u E 2  and  u = r 5 } .

Then Q= Q 1 Q 2 Q 3 .

By (F10), (3.4), (3.5) and (4.17), we know φ | Q 1 0. For each r 4 e+u Q 2 , one has u= u 0 + u E 2 and u r 5 . By the equivalence of a finite dimensional space and (4.23), there exists C 17 >0 such that

[ 0 , T ) T F ( t , r 4 e ( t ) + u ( t ) ) Δ t C 13 [ 0 , T ) T | r 4 e ( t ) + u ( t ) | μ Δ t C 14 T C 17 r 4 e + u μ C 14 T = C 17 ( r 4 2 + u 2 ) μ 2 C 14 T .

Thus, we have

φ ( r 4 e + u ) = r 4 2 2 ( I K ) e , e + 1 2 ( I K ) u , u + ϕ ( r 4 e + u ) [ 0 , T ) T F ( t , r 4 e ( t ) + u ( t ) ) Δ t r 4 2 2 I K δ u 2 C 17 ( r 4 2 + u 2 ) μ 2 + C 14 T r 4 2 2 I K C 17 r 4 μ + C 14 T 0

for large r 4 > ρ 9 due to μ>2.

Moreover, for each se+u Q 3 , one has s[0, r 4 ], u E 2 and u= r 5 . By the equivalence of a finite dimensional space and (4.23), one has

[ 0 , T ) T F ( t , s e ( t ) + u ( t ) ) Δ t C 13 [ 0 , T ) T | s e ( t ) + u ( t ) | μ Δ t C 14 T C 17 s e + u μ C 14 T = C 17 ( s 2 + r 5 2 ) μ 2 C 14 T .

Hence

φ ( s e + u ) = s 2 2 ( I K ) e , e + 1 2 ( I K ) u , u + ϕ ( s e + u ) [ 0 , T ) T F ( t , s e ( t ) + u ( t ) ) Δ t s 2 2 I K δ u 2 C 17 ( s 2 + r 5 2 ) μ 2 + C 14 T r 4 2 2 I K C 17 r 5 μ + C 14 T 0

for large r 5 > r 4 .

Summing up the above, φ satisfies all conditions of Theorem 3.2. Hence, φ possesses a critical value cσ>0, and hence problem (1.1) has at least one nontrivial weak solution. The proof is complete. □

Remark 4.1 There are a number of functions satisfying (A), (F8), (F9) and (F10), for example, F(t,x)= | x | 4 .

Next, we given two multiplicity results.

Theorem 4.3 Assume that (A), (F5), (F7), (F8), (F9) and the following conditions are satisfied.

(F11) I i j (iA, jB) are odd.

(F12) F(t,x) is even in x and F(t,0)=0.

Then problem (1.1) has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions.

Proof Set W= H + , V= H H 0 and E= H T 1 . Then E=VW, dimV<+ and φ C 1 (E,R). From the proof of Theorem 4.2, we know that φ satisfies the (PS) condition, and there exist ρ 9 >0 and σ>0 such that

φ(u)σ,uW with u= ρ 9 .

For each finite dimensional subspace E ˜ E, combining (3.2), (4.5), (4.6), (4.23) and the equivalence of a finite dimensional space, there exists C 18 >0 such that

φ ( u ) = 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T | u ˙ ( t ) | 2 Δ t + j = 1 p i = 1 N 0 u i ( t j ) I i j ( t ) d t 1 2 [ 0 , T ) T ( A ( t ) u ( t ) , u ( t ) ) Δ t + J ( u ) 1 2 u 2 + a ¯ p N C 1 u + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 + 1 2 C 4 [ 0 , T ) T | u ( t ) | 2 Δ t C 13 [ 0 , T ) T | u ( t ) | μ Δ t + C 14 T 1 2 ( 1 + 2 a ¯ p N C 1 + C 4 ) u 2 + b ¯ C 1 j = 1 p i = 1 N u ξ i j + 1 C 18 u μ + C 14 T .

Thus,

φ(u)as u E ˜  and u.
(4.30)

This implies that there is an R= R ( E ˜ ) >0 such that φ0 on E ˜ B R .

Moreover, by (F10) and (F12), we know that φ is even and φ(0)=0. In view of Theorem 3.3, φ has a sequence of critical points { u n }E such that |φ( u n )|. If { u n } is bounded in E, then by the definition of φ, one knows that {|φ( u n )|} is also bounded, a contradiction. Hence, { u n } is unbounded in E. The proof is completed. □

Example 4.2 Let T={ m ,m N 0 }, T=3, N=4, t 1 =1, t 2 =2. Consider the second-order Hamiltonian system with impulsive effects

{ u Δ 2 ( t ) + A ( σ ( t ) ) u ( σ ( t ) ) + F ( σ ( t ) , u σ ( t ) ) = 0 , Δ -a.e.  t [ 0 , 16 ] T ; u ( 0 ) u ( 16 ) = u Δ ( 0 ) u Δ ( 16 ) = 0 , ( u i ) Δ ( t j + ) ( u i ) Δ ( t j ) = I i j ( u i ( t j ) ) , i = 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , j = 1 , 2 ,
(4.31)

where A(t) is the unit matrix and

for all i=1,2,3,4, j=1,2. All conditions of Theorem 4.3 hold. According to Theorem 4.3, problem (4.31) has an unbounded sequence of weak solutions.

Remark 4.2 In Theorem 4.3, if we delete the condition ‘F(t,0)=0’, we have the following theorem.

Theorem 4.4 Assume that (A), (F5), (F7), (F8), (F9), (F11) and the following condition are satisfied.

(F13) F(t,x) is even in x.

Then problem (1.1) has an infinite sequence of distinct weak solutions.

Proof Set Y= H + , X= H H 0 and E= H T 1 in Theorem 3.4. Then, from the proof of Theorem 4.3, we know that E=XY, dim(X)<+, φ is even, φ C 1 (E,R) satisfies the (PS) condition, and there are constants ρ 9 ,σ>0 such that φ | B ρ 9 Y σ and infφ( B ρ 9 Y)>0, where B ρ 9 ={uE:u= ρ 9 }.

For each finite dimensional subspace E ˜ E, by (4.30), we know that

φ(u)as u E ˜  and u.

Consequently, for each finite dimensional subspace Y 0 Y, the condition ( Φ 2 ) holds. Moreover, by dim(X)<+ and φ C 1 (E,R), we know that ( Φ 0 ) holds too. Therefore, the conclusion follows from Theorem 2.6. □

References

  1. Zhou JW, Li YK: Sobolev’s spaces on time scales and its applications to a class of second order Hamiltonian systems on time scales. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 73: 1375-1388. 10.1016/j.na.2010.04.070

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou JW, Li YK: Existence of solutions for a class of second-order Hamiltonian systems with impulsive effects. Nonlinear Anal. 2010, 72: 1594-1603. 10.1016/j.na.2009.08.041

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Nieto JJ, O’Regan D: Variational approach to impulsive differential equations. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2009, 10: 680-690. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2007.10.022

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Nieto JJ: Impulsive resonance periodic problems of first order. Appl. Math. Lett. 2002, 15: 489-493. 10.1016/S0893-9659(01)00163-X

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Nieto JJ, Rodriguez-Lopez R: Boundary value problems for a class of impulsive functional equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2008, 55: 2715-2731. 10.1016/j.camwa.2007.10.019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen LJ, Chen FD: Dynamic behaviors of the periodic predator-prey system with distributed time delays and impulsive effect. Nonlinear Anal., Real World Appl. 2011, 12: 2467-2473. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.03.002

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu ZS, Chen HB, Zhou TJ: Variational methods to the second-order impulsive differential equation with Dirichlet boundary value problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 61: 1687-1699. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.01.042

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cichoń M, Satco B, Sikorska-Nowak A: Impulsive nonlocal differential equations through differential equations on time scales. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 218: 2449-2458. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.07.057

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiao J, Nieto JJ, Luo ZG: Multiplicity of solutions for nonlinear second order impulsive differential equations with linear derivative dependence via variational methods. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17: 426-432. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.05.015

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter TE: Necessary and sufficient conditions for optimal impulsive rendezvous with linear equations of motion. Dyn. Control 2000, 10: 219-227. 10.1023/A:1008376427023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pasquero S: On the simultaneous presence of unilateral and kinetic constraints in time-dependent impulsive mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 2006., 47: Article ID 082903

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tian Y, Ge WG: Applications of variational methods to boundary value problem for impulsive differential equations. Proc. Edinb. Math. Soc. 2008, 51: 509-527.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Aulbach B, Hilger S: Linear dynamic processes with inhomogeneous time scale. Mathematical Research 59. In Nonlinear Dynamics and Quantum Dynamical Systems. Akademie Verlag, Berlin; 1990:9-20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Erbe L, Hilger S: Sturmanian theory on measure chains. Differ. Equ. Dyn. Syst. 1993, 1(3):223-244.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Lakshmikantham V, Sivasundaram S, Kaymakcalan B: Dynamic Systems on Measure Chains. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht; 1996.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Agarwal RP, Bohner M: Basic calculus on time scales and some of its applications. Results Math. 1999, 35(1-2):3-22.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Agarwal RP, Otero-Espinar V, Perera K, Vivero DR: Basic properties of Sobolev’s spaces on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2006., 2006: Article ID 38121

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bohner M, Peterson A: Dynamic Equations on Time Scales: an Introduction with Applications. Birkhäuser, Boston; 2001.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Bohner M, Peterson A: Advances in Dynamic Equations on Time Scales. Birkhäuser, Boston; 2003.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas SK, Ouahab A: On first order impulsive dynamic equations on time scales. J. Differ. Equ. Appl. 2004, 6: 541-548.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Geng F, Xu Y, Zhu D: Periodic boundary value problems for first-order impulsive dynamic equations on time scales. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 4074-4087. 10.1016/j.na.2007.10.038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Graef JR, Ouahab A: Extremal solutions for nonresonance impulsive functional dynamic equations on time scales. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 196: 333-339. 10.1016/j.amc.2007.05.056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang DB: Positive solutions for nonlinear first-order periodic boundary value problems of impulsive dynamic equations on time scales. Comput. Math. Appl. 2008, 56: 1496-1504. 10.1016/j.camwa.2008.02.038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang HT, Li YK: Existence of positive periodic solutions for functional differential equations with impulse effects on time scales. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2009, 14: 19-26. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.08.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Li YK, Zhou JW: Existence of solutions for a class of damped vibration problems on time scales. Adv. Differ. Equ. 2010., 2010: Article ID 727486

    Google Scholar 

  26. Li YK, Dong YS: Multiple positive solutions for a fourth-order integral boundary value problem on time scales. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 59

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li YK, Shu JY: Multiple positive solutions for first-order impulsive integral boundary value problems on time scales. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 12

    Google Scholar 

  28. Li YK, Zhang TW: Multiple positive solutions for second-order -Laplacian dynamic equations with integral boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2011., 2011: Article ID 867615

    Google Scholar 

  29. Su YH, Feng Z: A non-autonomous Hamiltonian system on time scales. Nonlinear Anal. 2012, 75: 4126-4136. 10.1016/j.na.2012.03.003

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Mawhin J, Willem M: Critical Point Theory and Hamiltonian Systems. Springer, Berlin; 1989.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Luan SX, Mao AM: Periodic solutions for a class of non-autonomous Hamiltonian systems. Nonlinear Anal. 2005, 61: 1413-1426. 10.1016/j.na.2005.01.108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Rabinowitz PH CBMS Regional Conf. Ser. in Math. 65. In Minimax Methods in Critical Point Theory with Application to Differetial Equations. Am. Math. Soc., Providence; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bartsch T, Ding YH: Deformation theorems on non-metrizable vector spaces and applications to critical point theory. Math. Nachr. 2006, 279: 1267-1288. 10.1002/mana.200410420

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Rabinowitz PH: Periodic solutions of Hamiltonian systems. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 1978, 31: 157-184. 10.1002/cpa.3160310203

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu X, Chen SX, Teng KM: On variational methods for a class of damped vibration problems. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 68: 1432-1441. 10.1016/j.na.2006.12.043

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of People’s Republic of China under Grant 10971183, the Natural Sciences Foundation of Yunnan Province (2011Y116, 2012FB111, IRTSTYN) and the third batch young skeleton teachers training plan of Yunnan University (XT412003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongkun Li.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors typed, read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Wang, Y. & Li, Y. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for some second-order systems on time scales with impulsive effects. Bound Value Probl 2012, 148 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2012-148

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2012-148

Keywords