This article studies the partial vanishing viscosity limit of the 2D Boussinesq system in a bounded domain with a slip boundary condition. The result is proved globally in time by a logarithmic Sobolev inequality.
2010 MSC: 35Q30; 76D03; 76D05; 76D07.
Keywords:Boussinesq system; inviscid limit; slip boundary condition
Let Ω ⊂ ℝ2 be a bounded, simply connected domain with smooth boundary ∂Ω, and n is the unit outward normal vector to ∂Ω. We consider the Boussinesq system in Ω × (0, ∞):
where u, π, and θ denote unknown velocity vector field, pressure scalar and temperature of the fluid. ϵ > 0 is the heat conductivity coefficient and e2:= (0, 1)t. ω:= curlu:= ∂1u2 - ∂2u1 is the vorticity.
The aim of this article is to study the partial vanishing viscosity limit ϵ → 0. When Ω:= ℝ2, the problem has been solved by Chae . When θ = 0, the Boussinesq system reduces to the well-known Navier-Stokes equations. The investigation of the inviscid limit of solutions of the Navier-Stokes equations is a classical issue. We refer to the articles [2-7] when Ω is a bounded domain. However, the methods in [1-6] could not be used here directly. We will use a well-known logarithmic Sobolev inequality in [8,9] to complete our proof. We will prove:
for any T > 0, which implies
Here (u, θ) is the unique solution of the problem (1.1)-(1.5) with ϵ = 0.
2 Proof of Theorem 1.1
Since (1.7) follows easily from (1.6) by the Aubin-Lions compactness principle, we only need to prove the a priori estimates (1.6). From now on we will drop the subscript e and throughout this section C will be a constant independent of ϵ > 0.
for any u ∈ H3(Ω) with divu = 0 in Ω and u · n = 0 on ∂Ω.
Lemma 2.2. () For any u ∈ Ws,p with divu = 0 in Ω and u · n = 0 on ∂Ω, there holds
for any s > 1 and p ∈ (1, ∞).
By the maximum principle, it follows from (1.2), (1.3), and (1.4) that
Testing (1.3) by θ, using (1.2), (1.3), and (1.4), we see that
Testing (1.1) by u, using (1.2), (1.4), and (2.1), we find that
Here we used the well-known inequality:
Applying curl to (1.1), using (1.2), we get
Testing (2.4) by |ω|p-2ω (p > 2), using (1.2), (1.4), and (2.1), we obtain
(2.4) can be rewritten as
with f1: = θ - u1ω, f2:= -u2ω.
Using (2.1), (2.5) and the L∞-estimate of the heat equation, we reach the key estimate
Let τ be any unit tangential vector of ∂Ω, using (1.4), we infer that
on ∂Ω × (0, ∞).
It follows from (1.3), (1.4), and (2.7) that
Applying Δ to (1.3), testing by Δθ, using (1.2), (1.4), and (2.8), we derive
Now using the Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequalities
Similarly to (2.7) and (2.8), if follows from (2.4) and (1.4) that
Applying Δ to (2.4), testing by Δω, using (1.2), (1.4), (2.13), (2.10), and Lemma 2.2, we reach
Combining (2.11) and (2.14), using the Gronwall inequality, we conclude that
It follows from (1.1), (1.3), (2.15), and (2.16) that
This completes the proof.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This study was partially supported by the Zhejiang Innovation Project (Grant No. T200905), the ZJNSF (Grant No. R6090109), and the NSFC (Grant No. 11171154).
Chae, D: Global regularity for the 2D Boussinesq equations with partial viscosity terms. Adv Math. 203, 497–513 (2006). Publisher Full Text
Beirão da Veiga, H, Crispo, F: Concerning the Wk,p-inviscid limit for 3-D flows under a slip boundary condition. J Math Fluid Mech. 13, 117–135 (2011). Publisher Full Text
Clopeau, T, Mikelić, A, Robert, R: On the vanishing viscosity limit for the 2D incompressible Navier-Stokes equations with the friction type boundary conditions. Nonlin-earity. 11, 1625–1636 (1998). Publisher Full Text
Iftimie, D, Planas, G: Inviscid limits for the Navier-Stokes equations with Navier friction boundary conditions. Nonlinearity. 19, 899–918 (2006). Publisher Full Text
Xiao, YL, Xin, ZP: On the vanishing viscosity limit for the 3D Navier-Stokes equations with a slip boundary condition. Commun Pure Appl Math. 60, 1027–1055 (2007). Publisher Full Text
Ferrari, AB: On the blow-up of solutions of 3-D Euler equations in a bounded domain. Commun Math Phys. 155, 277–294 (1993). Publisher Full Text
Bourguignon, JP, Brezis, H: Remarks on the Euler equation. J Funct Anal. 15, 341–363 (1974). Publisher Full Text