Research

# Erratum to: Hierarchies of difference boundary value problems

Sonja Currie* and Anne D Love

Author Affiliations

School of Mathematics, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS, 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa

For all author emails, please log on.

Boundary Value Problems 2012, 2012:66  doi:10.1186/1687-2770-2012-66

 Received: 25 May 2012 Accepted: 30 May 2012 Published: 28 June 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### Erratum to: Boundary value problems, Volume 2011, Article ID 743135

(1) The following paragraph needs to be inserted immediately after Theorem 4.2:

It is important to note that the spectral parameter in the original boundary value problems given in cases (1)-(9) of Table 1 for Theorem 4.2 must first, without loss of generality, be shifted so as to ensure that all the eigenvalues are greater than zero. Similarly, for cases (10)-(12) of Table 1 for Theorem 4.2, the spectral parameter must be shifted so that the original boundary value problem has the least eigenvalue 0. Having made these shifts we then take to be a solution to (1.1) for , i.e., throughout the paper we set .

(2) In Corollary 4.4 and its proof, there were typographical errors as well as notation that was not apparent. These should read as follows:

Corollary 4.4Ifare the eigenvalues of any one of the original boundary value problems (1)-(9), in Theorem 4.2, with corresponding eigenfunctions, then

(i) , are the eigenvalues of the corresponding transformed boundary value problems (1)-(3), in Theorem 4.2, with corresponding eigenfunctions, ;

(ii) are the eigenvalues of the corresponding transformed boundary value problems (4)-(9), in Theorem 4.2, with corresponding eigenfunctions.

Also, if, are the eigenvalues of any one of the original boundary value problems (10)-(12), in Theorem 4.2, with corresponding eigenfunctions, , thenare the eigenvalues of the corresponding transformed boundary value problems (10)-(12), in Theorem 4.2, with corresponding eigenfunctions.

Proof By Theorems 2.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 we have that (2.1) transforms eigenfunctions of the original boundary value problems (1)-(9) to eigenfunctions of the corresponding transformed boundary value problems. In particular, if are the eigenvalues of one of the original boundary value problems, (1)-(9), with eigenfunctions , then:

(i) , are the eigenfunctions of the corresponding transformed boundary value problem, (1)-(3), with eigenvalues , . Since the transformed boundary value problems, (1)-(3), have eigenvalues, it follows that , constitute all the eigenvalues of the transformed boundary value problem;

(ii) are the eigenfunctions of the corresponding transformed boundary value problem, (4)-(9), with eigenvalues . Since the transformed boundary value problems, (4)-(9), have eigenvalues, it follows that constitute all the eigenvalues of the transformed boundary value problem.

Also, again by Theorems 2.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4 we have that (2.1) transforms eigenfunctions of the original boundary value problems (10)-(12) to eigenfunctions of the corresponding transformed boundary value problems. In particular, if , are the eigenvalues of one of the original boundary value problems, (10)-(12), with eigenfunctions , , then are the eigenfunctions of the corresponding transformed boundary value problem, (10)-(12), with eigenvalues . Since the transformed boundary value problems, (10)-(12), have eigenvalues, it follows that constitute all the eigenvalues of the transformed boundary value problem. □

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Authors’ contributions

Both SC and ADL worked jointly and separately on all aspects of this research.

### Acknowledgements

SC was supported by NRF grant no. IFR2011040100017.