Skip to main content

Three-point boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations with delay

Abstract

In this paper, we study three-point boundary value problems of the following fractional functional differential equations involving the Caputo fractional derivative:

where D α C , D β C denote Caputo fractional derivatives, 2<α<3, 0<β<1, η(0,1), 1<λ< 1 2 η . We use the Green function to reformulate boundary value problems into an abstract operator equation. By means of the Schauder fixed point theorem and the Banach contraction principle, some existence results of solutions are obtained, respectively. As an application, some examples are presented to illustrate the main results.

MSC:34A08, 34K37.

1 Introduction

Fractional calculus is a branch of mathematics, it is an emerging field in the area of the applied mathematics that deals with derivatives and integrals of arbitrary orders as well as with their applications. The origins can be traced back to the end of the seventeenth century. During the history of fractional calculus, it was reported that the pure mathematical formulations of the investigated problems started to be addressed with more applications in various fields. With the help of fractional calculus, we can describe natural phenomena and mathematical models more accurately. Therefore, fractional differential equations have received much attention and the theory and its application have been greatly developed; see [16].

Recently, there have been many papers focused on boundary value problems of fractional ordinary differential equations [715] and an initial value problem of fractional functional differential equations [1628]. But the results dealing with the boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations with delay are relatively scarce [2935]. It is well known that in practical problems, the behavior of systems not only depends on the status just at the present, but also on the status in the past. Thus, in many cases, we must consider fractional functional differential equations with delay in order to solve practical problems. Consequently, our aim in this paper is to study the existence of solutions for boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations.

In 2011, Rehman [12] studied the existence and uniqueness of solutions to nonlinear three-point boundary value problems for the following fractional differential equation:

where 1<δ<2, 0<σ<1, α,βR, αη(1β)+(1α)(tβη)0 and D 0 + δ C , D 0 + σ C denote Caputo fractional derivatives. By the Banach contraction principle and the Schauder fixed point theorem, they obtained some new existence and uniqueness results.

For 0<r<1, we denote by C r the Banach space of all continuous functions φ:[r,0]R endowed with the sup-norm

φ [ r , 0 ] :=sup { | φ ( s ) | : s [ r , 0 ] } .

If u:[r,1]R, then for any t[0,1], we denote by u t the element of C r defined by

u t (θ)=u(t+θ),for θ[r,0].

Enlightened by literature [12], in this paper we study the following three-point boundary value problem for the fractional functional differential equation:

D α C u(t)=f ( t , u t , C D β u ( t ) ) ,0<t<1,
(1.1)

where 2<α<3, 0<β<1 and D α C , D β C denote Caputo fractional derivatives, f(t, u t , C D β u(t)) is a continuous function associated with the boundary conditions

u (0)=0, u (1)=λ u (η),
(1.2)

and u 0 =φ, where η(0,1), 1<λ< 1 2 η and φ is an element of the space

C r + (0):= { ψ C r | ψ ( s ) 0 , s [ r , 0 ] , ψ ( 0 ) = 0 , C D β ψ ( s ) = 0 } .

To the best of our knowledge, no one has studied the existence of positive solutions for problem (1.1)-(1.2). The aim of this paper is to fill the gap in the relevant literatures. In this paper, we firstly give the fractional Green function and some properties of the Green function. Consequently, boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2) is reduced to an equivalent Fredholm integral equation. Then we extend the existence results for boundary value problems of an ordinary fractional differential equation of δ-order (1<δ<2) in [12] to a fractional functional differential equation of α-order (2<α<3). As an application, some examples are presented to illustrate the main results.

2 Preliminaries

For the convenience of the reader, we give the following background material from fractional calculus theory to facilitate the analysis of boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2). This material can be found in the recent literature; see [1, 2, 36].

Definition 2.1 ([1])

The fractional integral of order α (α>0) of a function f:( t 0 ,+)R is given by

I α f(t)= 1 Γ ( α ) t 0 t f ( s ) ( t s ) 1 α ds,t> t 0 ,

where Γ() is the gamma function, provided that the right-hand side is point-wise defined on ( t 0 ,+).

Definition 2.2 ([1])

The Caputo fractional derivative of order α (n1<α<n) of a function f:( t 0 ,+)R is given by

D α C f(t)= 1 Γ ( n α ) t 0 t f ( n ) ( s ) ( t s ) α + 1 n ds,t> t 0 ,

where Γ() is the gamma function, provided that the right-hand side is point-wise defined on ( t 0 ,+).

Obviously, the Caputo derivative for every constant function is equal to zero.

From the definition of the Caputo derivative, we can acquire the following statement.

Lemma 2.1 ([2])

Let f(t) L 1 [ t 0 ,). Then

D α C ( I α f ( t ) ) =f(t),t> t 0 and 0<α<1.

Lemma 2.2 ([2])

Let α>0. Then

I α C D α f(t)=f(t) c 1 c 2 t c n t n 1

for some c i R, i=1,2,,n, where n=[α]+1 and [α] denotes the integer part of α.

Next, we introduce the Green function of fractional functional differential equations boundary value problems.

Lemma 2.3 Let 2<α<3, 0<η<1, 1<λ< 1 2 η and h:[0,1]R be continuous. Then the boundary value problem

D α C u ( t ) = h ( t ) , 0 < t < 1 , u ( 0 ) = u ( 0 ) = 0 , u ( 1 ) = λ u ( η ) ,
(2.1)

has a unique solution

u(t)= 0 1 G(t,s)h(s)ds,
(2.2)

where

(2.3)

Proof From equation (2.1), we know

I α C D α u(t)= I α h(t).

From Lemma 2.2, we have

(2.4)

According to (2.1), we know that

By u (1)=λ u (η), we have

c 3 = α 1 ( 2 2 λ η ) Γ ( α ) ( 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s λ 0 η ( η s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s ) .

Therefore,

Now, for tη, we have

u ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( t s ) α 1 h ( s ) d s + ( α 1 ) t 2 ( 2 2 λ η ) Γ ( α ) ( ( 0 t + t η + η 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s λ ( 0 t + t η ) ( η s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s ) = 1 Γ ( α ) 0 t ( ( t s ) α 1 + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( ( 1 s ) α 2 λ ( η s ) α 2 ) ) h ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( α ) t η ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( ( 1 s ) α 2 λ ( η s ) α 2 ) h ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( α ) η 1 ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( 1 s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s .

For tη, we have

u ( t ) = 1 Γ ( α ) ( 0 η + η t ) ( t s ) α 1 h ( s ) d s + ( α 1 ) t 2 ( 2 2 λ η ) Γ ( α ) ( ( 0 η + η t + t 1 ) ( 1 s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s λ 0 η ( η s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s ) = 1 Γ ( α ) 0 η ( ( t s ) α 1 + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( ( 1 s ) α 2 λ ( η s ) α 2 ) ) h ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( α ) η t ( ( t s ) α 1 + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( 1 s ) α 2 ) h ( s ) d s + 1 Γ ( α ) t 1 ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( 1 s ) α 2 h ( s ) d s .

Hence, we can conclude (2.2) holds, where

G(t,s)= 1 Γ ( α ) { ( t s ) α 1 + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( ( 1 s ) α 2 λ ( η s ) α 2 ) , 0 s t 1 , s η , ( t s ) α 1 + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( 1 s ) α 2 , 0 s t 1 , η s , ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( ( 1 s ) α 2 λ ( η s ) α 2 ) , 0 t s 1 , s η , ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η ( 1 s ) α 2 , 0 t s 1 , η s .

The proof is completed. □

Lemma 2.4 ([36] Schauder fixed point theorem)

Let (D,d) be a complete metric space, U be a closed convex subset of D, and T:DD be the map such that the set Tu:uU is relatively compact in D. Then the operator T has at least one fixed point u U:

T u = u .

3 Main results

In this section, we discuss the existence and uniqueness of solutions for boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2) by the Schauder fixed point theorem and the Banach contraction principle.

For convenience, we define the Banach space X={u|uC[r,1] , C D β uC[r,1],0<β<1}. Also, if I is an interval of the real line , by C(I) and C 1 (I) we denote the set of continuous and continuously differentiable functions on I, respectively. Moreover, for uC(I), we define

u I = max t I | u ( t ) | + max t I | C D β u(t)|.
(3.1)

For u 0 =φ, in view of the definitions of u t and φ, we have

u 0 =u(θ)=φ(θ),for θ[r,0].

Thus, we have

u(t)=φ(t),for t[r,0].

Since f:[0,1]× C r ×RR is a continuous function, set f(t, u t , C D β u(t)):=h(t) in Lemma 2.3. We have by Lemma 2.3 that a function u is a solution of boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2) if and only if it satisfies

u(t)={ 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) d s , t ( 0 , 1 ) , φ ( t ) , t [ r , 0 ] .

We define an operator T:XX as follows:

Tu(t)=u(t)={ 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) d s , t ( 0 , 1 ) , φ ( t ) , t [ r , 0 ] ,
(3.2)

and

l= max 0 t 1 ( 0 1 | G ( t , s ) g ( s ) | d s ) ,
l = max 0 t 1 ( 0 1 | t G ( t , s ) g ( s ) | d s ) ,
Q= 1 Γ ( 2 β ) + 1 + λ η α 1 Γ ( 2 β ) ( 1 λ η ) + 1 α + λ η α 1 + 1 2 2 λ η .

Theorem 3.1 Assume the following:

(H1) There exists a nonnegative function gL[0,1] such that

| f ( t , v , w ) | g(t)+a | v | k 1 +b | w | k 2

for each v C r , wR, where a,bR are nonnegative constants and 0< k 1 , k 2 <1; or

(H2) There exists a nonnegative function gL[0,1] such that

| f ( t , v , w ) | g(t)+a | v | k 1 +b | w | k 2

for each v C r , wR, where a,bR are nonnegative constants and k 1 , k 2 >1.

Then boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2) has a solution.

Proof Suppose (H1) holds. Choose

ωmax { 3 ( l + l Γ ( 2 β ) ) , ( 3 a Q ) 1 1 k 1 , ( 3 b Q ) 1 1 k 2 }
(3.3)

and define the cone U={uX|uω,ω>0}.

For any uU, we have

| T u ( t ) | = | 0 1 G ( t , s ) f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) d s | 0 1 | G ( t , s ) g ( s ) | d s + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) ( 0 t ( t s ) α 1 Γ ( α ) d s + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) d s + ( α 1 ) λ t 2 2 2 λ η 0 η ( η s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) d s ) l + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) ( t α α Γ ( α ) + t 2 ( 2 2 λ η ) Γ ( α ) + λ t 2 η α 1 ( 2 2 λ η ) Γ ( α ) ) l + a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 Γ ( α ) ( 1 α + λ η α 1 + 1 2 2 λ η ) .
(3.4)

Also,

| T u ( t ) | 0 1 | t G ( t , s ) | | f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) | d s 0 1 | t G ( t , s ) g ( s ) | d s + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) ( 0 t ( t s ) α 2 Γ ( α 1 ) d s + 2 ( α 1 ) t 2 2 λ η 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) d s + 2 ( α 1 ) λ t 2 2 λ η 0 η ( η s ) α 2 Γ ( α ) d s ) l + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) ( t α 1 Γ ( α ) + t ( 1 λ η ) Γ ( α ) + λ t η α 1 ( 1 λ η ) Γ ( α ) ) l + a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 Γ ( α ) ( 1 + 1 + λ η α 1 1 λ η ) .

Hence,

In view of (3.1) and (3.3), we obtain

T u ( t ) l + l Γ ( 2 β ) + a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 Γ ( α ) ( 1 Γ ( 2 β ) + 1 + λ η α 1 Γ ( 2 β ) ( 1 λ η ) + 1 α + λ η α 1 + 1 2 2 λ η ) ω 3 + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) Q ω 3 + ω 3 + ω 3 ω ,
(3.5)

which implies that T:UU. The continuity of the operator T follows from the continuity of f and G.

Now, if (H2) holds, we choose

0<ωmin { 3 ( l + l Γ ( 2 β ) ) , ( 1 3 a Q ) 1 1 k 1 , ( 1 3 b Q ) 1 1 k 2 }
(3.6)

and by the same process as above, we obtain

T u ( t ) l + l Γ ( 2 β ) + a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 Γ ( α ) ( 1 Γ ( 2 β ) + 1 + λ η α 1 Γ ( 2 β ) ( 1 λ η ) + 1 α + λ η α 1 + 1 2 2 λ η ) ω 3 + ( a | ω | k 1 + b | ω | k 2 ) Q ω 3 + ω 3 + ω 3 ω ,

which implies that T:UU.

Now, we show that T is a completely continuous operator.

Let L= max 0 t 1 |f(t, u t , C D β u(t))|+1. Then for uU and t 1 , t 2 [r,1] with t 1 < t 2 , in view of Lemma 2.3, if 0 t 1 < t 2 1, then

If r t 1 < t 2 0, then

| T u ( t 2 ) T u ( t 1 ) | = | φ ( t 2 ) φ ( t 1 ) | .

If r t 1 <0< t 2 1, then

| T u ( t 2 ) T u ( t 1 ) | | T u ( t 2 ) T u ( 0 ) | + | T u ( 0 ) T u ( t 1 ) | 0 1 | G ( t 2 , s ) G ( 0 , s ) | | f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) | d s + | φ ( 0 ) φ ( t 1 ) | L Γ ( α ) | t 2 α α + t 2 2 ( 1 λ η α 1 ) 2 2 λ η | + φ ( t 1 ) .

Hence, if 0 t 1 < t 2 1, we have

If r t 1 < t 2 0, in view of the definition of φ, we have

| C D β Tu( t 2 ) C D β Tu( t 1 ) | = | C D β φ( t 2 ) C D β φ( t 1 )|=0.

If r t 1 <0< t 2 1, then

Hence, if 0 t 1 < t 2 1, we have

If r t 1 < t 2 0, we have

T u ( t 2 ) T u ( t 1 ) = φ ( t 2 ) φ ( t 1 ) .

If r t 1 <0< t 2 1, then

T u ( t 2 ) T u ( t 1 ) 1 Γ ( α ) | t 2 α α + t 2 2 ( 1 λ η α 1 ) 2 2 λ η | + φ ( t 1 ) + L t 2 1 β Γ ( 2 β ) .

In any case, it implies that Tu( t 2 )Tu( t 1 )0 as t 2 t 1 , i.e., for any ϵ>0, there exists δ>0, independent of t 1 , t 2 and u, such that |Tu( t 2 )Tu( t 1 )|ϵ, whenever | t 2 t 1 |<δ. Therefore T:XX is completely continuous. The proof is completed. □

For convenience, we denote

Theorem 3.2 Assume that

(H3) There exists a constant p>0 such that |f(t,μ,ν)f(t, μ ¯ , ν ¯ )|p(|μ μ ¯ |+|ν ν ¯ |) for each μ, μ ¯ C r , ν, ν ¯ R. If

p< ( M + N ) 1 ,

then boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2) has a unique solution.

Proof Consider the operator T:XX defined by (3.2). Clearly, the fixed point of the operator T is the solution of boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2). We will use the Banach contraction principle to prove that T has a fixed point. We first show that T is a contraction. For each t[0,1],

| T u ( t ) T u ¯ ( t ) | 0 1 | G ( t , s ) | | f ( s , u s , C D β u ( s ) ) f ( s , u ¯ s , C D β u ¯ ( s ) ) | d s p u u ¯ Γ ( α ) ( 0 t ( t s ) α 1 d s + ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η 0 1 ( 1 s ) α 2 d s + λ ( α 1 ) t 2 2 2 λ η 0 η ( η s ) α 2 d s ) p u u ¯ Γ ( α ) ( t α α + t 2 2 2 λ η + t 2 λ η α 2 2 2 λ η ) p u u ¯ Γ ( α ) ( 1 α + 1 2 2 λ η + λ η α 2 2 2 λ η ) p u u ¯ M .
(3.7)

By a similar method, we get

| C D β T u ( t ) C D β T u ¯ ( t ) | = | 1 Γ ( 1 β ) 0 t ( t s ) β ( T u ( s ) T u ¯ ( s ) ) d s | 1 Γ ( 1 β ) 0 t ( t s ) β ( 0 1 | s G ( s , z ) | | f ( z , u z , C D β u ( z ) ) f ( z , u ¯ z , C D β u ¯ ( z ) ) | d z ) d s p u u ¯ Γ ( 1 β ) 0 t ( t s ) β ( 0 1 | s G ( s , z ) | d z ) d s .
(3.8)

In view of the definition of G(t,s), we obtain

Hence,

| C D β T u ( t ) C D β T u ¯ ( t ) | p u u ¯ Γ ( 1 β ) 0 t ( t s ) β Γ ( α ) ( 1 + 1 + λ η α 1 1 λ η ) d s p u u ¯ Γ ( 1 β ) 1 Γ ( α ) 1 1 β ( 1 + 1 + λ η α 1 1 λ η ) p u u ¯ Γ ( 2 β ) Γ ( α ) ( 1 + 1 + λ η α 1 1 λ η ) p u u ¯ N .
(3.9)

Clearly, for each t[r,0], we have |Tu(t)T u ¯ (t)|=0. Therefore, by (3.7) and (3.9), we get

TuT u ¯ pu u ¯ M+pu u ¯ Npu u ¯ (N+M)u u ¯

and T is a contraction. As a consequence of the Banach contraction principle, we get that T has a fixed point which is a solution of boundary value problem (1.1) and (1.2). □

4 Example

In this section, we will present some examples to illustrate our main results.

Example 4.1

Consider boundary value problems of the following fractional functional differential equations:

(4.1)
(4.2)

where D α C , D β C denote Caputo fractional derivatives, 2<α<3, 0<β<1, t(0,1).

Choose λ= 6 5 , η= 1 3 , ϕ(t)= e t 1 36 , a= e t 110 , b= e t 143 and

f ( t , u t , C D β u ( t ) ) = e t 1 36 + e t 110 | u t | k 1 + e t 143 | C D β u(t) | k 2 .

Then, for t(0,1), we have

| f ( t , u t , C D β u ( t ) ) | ϕ(t)+a | u t | k 1 +b | C D β u(t) | k 2 .

For 0< k 1 , k 2 <1, (H1) is satisfied and for k 1 , k 2 >1, (H2) is satisfied. Therefore, by Theorem 3.1, boundary value problem (4.1) and (4.2) has a solution.

Example 4.2

Consider boundary value problems of the following fractional functional differential equations:

(4.3)
(4.4)

where D α C , D β C denote Caputo fractional derivatives, 2<α<3, 0<β<1, t(0,1).

Choose λ= 7 6 , η= 3 8 and

f ( t , u t , C D β u ( t ) ) = | u t | + | C D β u ( t ) | ( 6 + 9 e t ) ( 1 + | u t | + | C D β u ( t ) | ) .

Set

f(t,μ,ν)= | μ | + | ν | ( 6 + 9 e t ) ( 1 + | μ | + | ν | ) .

Let μ, μ ¯ C r , ν, ν ¯ R. Then for each t[0,1],

| f ( t , μ , ν ) f ( t , μ ¯ , ν ¯ ) | = 1 6 + 9 e t | | μ | + | ν | 1 + | μ | + | ν | | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | 1 + | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | | = | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ( 6 + 9 e t ) ( 1 + | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | ) ( 1 + | μ | + | ν | ) 1 6 + 9 e t ( | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ) 1 15 ( | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ) .

For each t[1,0],

| f ( t , μ , ν ) f ( t , μ ¯ , ν ¯ ) | = 1 6 + 9 e t | | μ | + | ν | 1 + | μ | + | ν | | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | 1 + | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | | = | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ( 6 + 9 e t ) ( 1 + | μ ¯ | + | ν ¯ | ) ( 1 + | μ | + | ν | ) 1 6 + 9 e t ( | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ) 1 6 ( | μ + μ ¯ | | ν ν ¯ | ) .

Thus the condition (H3) holds with p= 1 15 . For λ= 7 6 , η= 3 8 , we have

By 2<α<3, 0<β<1, we have

1 3 1 α < 1 2

and

M> 1 Γ ( α ) 131 54 ,N> 32 9 Γ ( 2 β ) Γ ( α ) .

It implies that

p= 1 15 <0.167< ( M + N ) 1 .

Then by Theorem 3.2, boundary value problem (4.3) and (4.4) has a unique solution.

References

  1. Podlubny I: Fractional Differential Equations. Academic Press, San Diego; 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Kilbas A, Srivastava H, Trujillo J: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. Elsevier, Amsterdam; 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Oldham K, Spanier J: The Fractional Calculus. Academic Press, New York; 1974.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller K, Ross B: An Introduction to the Fractional Calculus and Fractional Differential Equation. Wiley, New York; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Samko S, Kilbas A, Marichev O: Fractional Integral and Derivative, Theory and Applications. Gordon and Breach, Switzerland; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chang Y-K, Zhang R, N’Guérékata GM: Weighted pseudo almost automorphic mild solutions to fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64(10):3160-3170. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.02.039

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Agarwal RP, Benchohra M, Hamani A: Boundary value problems for fractional differential equations. Georgian Math. J. 2009, 16: 401-411.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao Y, Sun S, Han Z, Li Q: The existence of multiple positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16(4):2086-2097. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.08.017

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao Y, Sun S, Han Z, Li Q: Positive solutions to boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2011, 2011: 1-16.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao Y, Sun S, Han Z, Zhang M: Positive solutions for boundary value problems of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 2011, 217: 6950-6958. 10.1016/j.amc.2011.01.103

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Feng W, Sun S, Han Z, Zhao Y: Existence of solutions for a singular system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011, 62(3):1370-1378. 10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.076

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Rehman M, Khan R, Asif N: Three point boundary value problems for nonlinear fractional differential equations. Acta Math. Sci. 2011, 31B(4):1337-1346.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Diethelm K: The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin; 2010.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun S, Zhao Y, Han Z, Li Y: The existence of solutions for boundary value problem of fractional hybrid differential equations. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2012, 17: 4961-4967. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.06.001

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sun S, Zhao Y, Han Z, Xu M: Uniqueness of positive solutions for boundary value problems of singular fractional differential equations. Inverse Probl. Sci. Eng. 2012, 20: 299-309. 10.1080/17415977.2011.603726

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Benchohra M, Henderson J, Ntouyas S, Ouahab A: Existence results for fractional order functional differential equations with infinite delay. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2008, 338: 1340-1350. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2007.06.021

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lakshmikantham V, Vatsala A: Basic theory of fractional differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 2677-2682. 10.1016/j.na.2007.08.042

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Lakshmikantham V, Vatsala A: Theory of fractional differential inequalities and applications. Commun. Appl. Anal. 2007, 11: 395-402.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lakshmikantham V: Theory of fractional functional differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. 2008, 69: 3337-3343. 10.1016/j.na.2007.09.025

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Lakshmikantham V, Devi J: Theory of fractional differential equations in Banach space. Eur. J. Pure Appl. Math. 2008, 1: 38-45.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Agarwal RP, Zhou Y, He Y: Existence of fractional neutral functional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2010, 59: 1095-1100. 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.05.010

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Agarwal RP, Zhou Y, Wang J, Xian N: Fractional neutral functional differential equations with causal operators in Banach spaces. Math. Comput. Model. 2011, 54: 1440-1452. 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.04.016

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sun S, Li Q, Li Y: Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a coupled system of multi-term nonlinear fractional differential equations. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64: 3310-3320. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.065

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Li Q, Sun S, Zhao P, Han Z: Existence and uniqueness of solutions for initial value problem of nonlinear fractional differential equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012, 2012: 1-14.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Maraaba T, Baleanu D, Jarad F: Existence and uniqueness theorem for a class of delay differential equations with left and right Caputo fractional derivatives. J. Math. Phys. 2008, 49: 483-507.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou Y, Jiao F, Li J: Existence and uniqueness for p -type fractional neutral differential equations. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2009, 71(7-8):2724-2733. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.105

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou Y, Jiao F, Li J: Existence and uniqueness for fractional neutral differential equations with infinite delay. Nonlinear Anal. TMA 2009, 71(7-8):3249-3256. 10.1016/j.na.2009.01.202

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J, Zhou Y, Wei W: A class of fractional delay nonlinear integrodifferential controlled systems in Banach spaces. Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 2011, 16: 4049-4059. 10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.02.003

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou Y, Tian Y, He Y: Floquet boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 50: 1-13.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Bai C: Existence of positive solutions for a functional fractional boundary value problem. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2010, 2010: 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ouyang Z, Chen YM, Zou SL: Existence of positive solutions to a boundary value problem for a delayed nonlinear fractional differential system. Bound. Value Probl. 2011, 2011: 1-17.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Bai C: Existence of positive solutions for boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations. Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. 2010, 30: 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ahmad B, Alsaedi A: Nonlinear fractional differential equations with nonlocal fractional integro-differential boundary conditions. Bound. Value Probl. 2012, 2012: 1-10. 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-1

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao Y, Chen H, Huang L: Existence of positive solutions for nonlinear fractional functional differential equation. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64: 3456-3467. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.01.081

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Su X: Positive solutions to singular boundary value problems for fractional functional differential equations with changing sign nonlinearity. Comput. Math. Appl. 2012, 64: 3425-3435. 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.02.043

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo D, Lakshmikantham V: Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cone. Academic Press, Orlando; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank the reviewers for their valuable suggestions and useful comments that have led to the present improved version of the original manuscript. This research is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (11071143, 60904024, 61174217), Natural Science Outstanding Youth Foundation of Shandong Province (JQ201119) and supported by Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2012AM009, ZR2010AL002, ZR2011AL007), also supported by Natural Science Foundation of Educational Department of Shandong Province (J11LA01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shurong Sun.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors declare that the study was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Sun, S., Yang, D. et al. Three-point boundary value problems of fractional functional differential equations with delay. Bound Value Probl 2013, 38 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-38

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1687-2770-2013-38

Keywords