Abstract
We discuss the onesided Green’s function, associated with an initial value problem and the twosided Green’s function related to a boundary value problem. We present a specific calculation associated with a differential equation with constant coefficients. For both problems, we also present the Laplace integral transform as another methodology to calculate these Green’s functions and conclude which is the most convenient one. An incursion in the socalled fractional Green’s function is also presented. As an example, we discuss the isotropic harmonic oscillator.
1 Introduction
There are several methods to discuss a secondorder linear partial differential equation. Among them we mention the simplest one, the method of separation of variables, and the method of integral transforms, particularly the Laplace transform, which is in many cases most convenient [1].
On the other hand, after the method of separation of variables, we get the following general secondorder linear ordinary differential equation:
on the interval , whose corresponding nonhomogeneous one is given by
where is a forcing term. Assuming that is a continuously differentiable positive function on this interval and that and are continuous functions, we can write the above ordinary differential equation as follows:
the socalled selfadjoint form known also as an ordinary differential equation in the SturmLiouville form. In this equation, and are continuous functions that are related to the coefficients , and . The nonhomogeneous term, , is also related to [1].
The methodology of the Laplace integral transform is adequate to discuss the onesided Green’s function^{a} because the initial conditions, in general, are given in terms of the own function and the first derivative. A simple question arises when we discuss the twosided Green’s function associated with a problem involving boundary conditions, i.e., is the Laplace transform methodology convenient to discuss this problem? The answer depends on the sort of problem we are studying, as we will see in the following sections.
On the other hand, the fractional harmonic oscillator was discussed in a series of papers by Narahari et al.[25] where they presented the dynamic of the fractional harmonic oscillator, including also the damping, and by Tofighi [6] who discusses the intrinsic damping.
In this paper we discuss Eq. (1) associated with an initial value problem and a boundary value problem. In both cases, we present two methodologies, the Laplace integral transform and the Green’s function methodology. After that we conclude which methodology is the most convenient one. We sum the paper up presenting the corresponding fractional case where we discuss the Green’s function associated with the fractional harmonic oscillator. Finally, we present our concluding remarks.
2 Onesided Green’s function
To solve the selfadjoint differential equation, we introduce the socalled onesided Green’s function, also called influence function, a twoparameter function, denoted by , which describes the influence of a disturbance (also known as impulse) on the value of at a point x, concentrated at the point ξ. If we know the Green’s function, as we construct below, the solution of an initial value problem composed of the selfadjoint differential equation and the initial conditions can be written as follows:
For a fixed value of ξ, the onesided Green’s function is the solution of the corresponding homogeneous initial value problem, i.e., for we have the homogeneous ordinary differential equation
and the initial conditions
2.1 Constant coefficients
As a particular case, we consider the problem involving an ordinary differential equation with constant coefficients, which can represent a problem related to the classical harmonic oscillator and transmission lines, for example,
where a and b are positive constants, and the homogeneous initial conditions are given by .
First of all, we write the ordinary differential equation in the corresponding selfadjoint ordinary differential equation
Thus, the onesided Green’s function, denoted by , satisfies the following homogeneous ordinary differential equation for ξ fixed:
and the initial conditions
Two linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous ordinary differential equation are given by
which furnishes for the general solution (the Green’s function)
where and must be calculated by means of the initial conditions, i.e., by the following system:
Solving the system above, we obtain
which furnish for the onesided Green’s function, for ,
and, as we know, satisfies the property .
Finally, the solution of our initial value problem is given by
2.2 Laplace transform
Another way to calculate this onesided Green’s function is by means of the methodology of Laplace transform. Multiplying Eq. (3) by the kernel of Laplace transform, with and integrating from zero to infinity, we have
where
Using the initial conditions, we obtain an algebraic equation whose solution is given by
By means of the convolution product and the relation involving the inverse Laplace transform
we get
which is exactly Eq. (5).
3 Twosided Green’s function
In the case that we have a twopoint boundary value problem, i.e., when the boundary conditions are fixed on the extremes of the interval, we have a twosided Green’s function, also called Green’s function, only.
We consider the secondorder ordinary differential equation in the SturmLiouville form
for and the boundary conditions , and comparing this problem with the corresponding onesided Green’s function, we have put in the place of for convenience only.
The twosided Green’s function, denoted by for each ξ, satisfies the following problem consisting of homogeneous ordinary differential equation
for and the homogeneous boundary conditions
This Green’s function must satisfy also the continuity
and a jump discontinuity on the first derivative [1]
The solution can be interrelated as a displacement and be given by
where is a force per unit length. is the displacement at x due to a force of unit magnitude concentrated at ξ. In this case, we have , the socalled reciprocity law.
3.1 Constant coefficients
As an example, we discuss the following ordinary differential equation:
with the homogeneous boundary conditions .
First, we construct the corresponding Green’s function, as we have seen before. Two linearly independent solutions of the homogeneous ordinary differential equation are
Imposing that satisfies , we can write
On the other hand, to satisfy , we put
Using the continuity at and the jump discontinuity of the first derivative, we obtain a system of two algebraic equations involving and whose solution is
Thus, the Green’s function is given by the following expression:
Using this Green’s function, the solution of the boundary value problem can be written as follows:
3.2 Laplace transform
As we have already said, the Laplace transform converts the differential equation with constant coefficients into an algebraic equation whose solution is
where and are the corresponding Laplace transforms of and , respectively.
Using the inverse Laplace transform and the convolution product, we get
Thus, substituting the boundary conditions, we obtain two algebraic equations, a system involving and . Solving this algebraic system, we obtain
which can be rewritten as follows:
where the Green’s function is given by
which is the same expression as that obtained in Section 3.1.
At this point we conclude that for a problem involving initial conditions, the Laplace integral transform is more convenient since and are known. On the other hand, i.e., for a problem involving boundary conditions, the SturmLiouville, as opposed to the Laplace integral transform, is more convenient in the sense that the calculation is much more simple.
4 Fractional Green’s function
Fractional calculus is one of the most accurate tools to refine the description of natural phenomena. The usual way to use this tool is to replace the integerorder derivatives of the partial differential equation that describes one specific phenomenon by a derivative of noninteger order. For many expected reasons, the solution of a fractional partial differential equation used to be much more complicated than the solution of the corresponding integerorder partial differential equation.
On the other hand, many important results and generalizations were obtained using this procedure in several areas such as fluid flow, diffuse transport, electrical networks, probability, biomathematics and others [712]. Here, as a generalization to the integer case, we present a calculation associated with the socalled fractional onesided and twosided Green’s function relative to the fractional differential equation with constant coefficients, i.e., we obtain the fractional Green’s function for the fractional differential equation whose coefficients are constants. We discuss the problem by means of the Laplace integral transform, and as an application, we present explicitly the Green’s function associated with the fractional harmonic oscillator.
4.1 Fractional onesided Green’s function
Let a, b and c be real constants. We present the solution of the fractional differential equation
where and and the fractional derivatives are taken in the Caputo sense [13]. We also consider as the initial conditions. In the case where and , we recover the results associated with the integer case, and taking and , we recover the equation associated with the fractional relaxoroscillator as discussed in [5].
Introducing the Laplace transform and using the initial conditions, we obtain an algebraic equation whose solution can be written as follows:
where is the Laplace transform of the . This expression can be manipulated, using the geometric series, to obtain
Using the Laplace transform of the generalized MittagLeffler function and its corresponding inverse [13],
which is the solution of the fractional differential equation.
Thus, the onesided fractional Green’s function can be written as follows:
Taking , and in Eq. (7), we get
which is the fractional onesided Green’s function associated with the fractional harmonic oscillator. The onesided Green’s function associated with the classical harmonic oscillator is recovered by introducing in the last equation, i.e.,
which can also be written as follows:
which is the same expression as that obtained in Eq. (4) in the case .
To conclude this section, we plot, in Figure 1, a graphic for particular values of the parameter α to compare with the sine function. This graphic is plotted using the program (MatLab R2009a). For reader interested in the MittagLeffler function, we suggest a recent nice book [14] and the paper [15] particularly regarding the asymptotic algebraic behavior of this function.
Figure 1. Graphics forwith.
4.2 Fractional twosided Green’s function
Let a, b and c be real constants. We present the solution of the fractional differential equation, Eq. (6), with the homogeneous boundary conditions, .
By means of the Laplace transform, we can write
where is the Laplace transform of the . This algebraic equation can be manipulated as follows:
From the inverse Laplace transform and the convolution theorem, we get
which can be rewritten in the following way:
As we have already said in Section 3, to explicitly calculate the solution, we must substitute the homogeneous boundary conditions in the last equation and determine the and . Finally, we can get the respective fractional twosided Green’s function. We have shown this is a hard calculation. To obtain the results associated with the fractional harmonic oscillator, we introduce , and in the last equation. Remember that to obtain the respective Green’s function, we substitute to the corresponding delta function.
5 Concluding remarks
We have presented and discussed the socalled onesided and twosided Green’s function to study, respectively, an initial value problem and a boundary value problem. Besides that, we studied the same problems by means of the Laplace transform methodology in order to conclude which methodology was most accurate for each problem. We also obtained the fractional generalization of the onesided and twosided Green’s function in terms of the generalized MittagLeffler function.
We conclude that for the initial value problem, the Laplace integral transform methodology is more convenient; on the other hand, for the boundary value problem, the twosided Green’s function provides a much more simple calculation. It is important to note that in the present manuscript we did not consider the problem involving physical dimensions. This problem has been discussed in a recent paper by Inizan [16].
A natural continuation of this work would be to study the problems involving partial differential equations with nonconstant coefficients and their fractional versions, which could provide a better description of the phenomena related to those equations. Study in this direction is upcoming.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
RFC had the idea of the work. ECO had the idea to consider the fractional version. AOC had the fractional harmonic oscillator, idea. All authors have made the calculations involved. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Prof. J. Vaz Jr., Dr. J. Emílio Maiorino and Dr. E. Contharteze Grigoletto for several useful discussions. Besides that, we are thankful to the referees for several important suggestions which improved this article a lot.
End notes

A recent historical review about George Green can be found in ref. [17].
References

Capelas de Oliveira, E: Special Functions and Applications, Editora Livraria da Física, São Paulo (2012)

Clarke, T, Narahari Achar, BN, Hanneken, JW: MittagLeffler functions and transmission lines. J. Mol. Liq.. 114, 159–163 (2004). Publisher Full Text

Narahari Achar, BN, Hanneken, JW, Clarke, T: Response characteristics of a fractional oscillator. Physica A. 309, 275–288 (2002). Publisher Full Text

Narahari Achar, BN, Hanneken, JW, Clarke, T: Damping characteristic of a fractional oscillator. Physica A. 339, 311–319 (2004). Publisher Full Text

Narahari Achar, BN, Hanneken, JW: Dynamic response of the fractional relaxoroscillator to a harmonic driving force. In: Sabatier J (ed.) Advances in Fractional Calculus: Theoretical Developments and Applications in Physics and Engineering, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

Tofighi, A: The intrinsic damping of the fractional oscillator. Physica A. 329, 29–34 (2003). Publisher Full Text

Capelas de Oliveira, E, Mainardi, F, Vaz, J Jr..: Models based on MittagLeffler functions for anomalous relaxation in dielectrics. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.. 193, 161–171 (2011). Publisher Full Text

Capelas de Oliveira, E, Vaz, J Jr..: Tunneling in fractional quantum mechanics. J. Phys. A, Math. Theor.. 44, (2011) Article ID 185303

Figueiredo Camargo, R, Charnet, R, Capelas de Oliveira, E: On the fractional Green function. J. Math. Phys.. 50, (2009) Article ID 043514

Kilbas, AA, Srivastava, HM, Trujillo, JJ: Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

Klafter J, Lim SC, Metzler R (eds.): Fractional Dynamics, Recent Advances, World Scientific, Singapore (2011)

De Paoli, AL, Rocca, MC: The fractionary Schrödinger equation, Green functions and ultradistribution. Phys. A, Stat. Mech. Appl.. 392, 111–122 (2013). Publisher Full Text

Figueiredo Camargo, R, Chiacchio, AO, Capelas de Oliveira, E: Differentiation to fractional orders and the fractional telegraph equation. J. Math. Phys.. 49, (2008) Article ID 033505

Mainardi, F: Fractional Calculus and Waves in Linear Viscoelasticity, Imperial College Press, London (2010)

Gorenflo, R, Mainardi, F: Fractional calculus, integral and differential equations of fractional order. In: Carpinteri A, Mainardi F (eds.) Fractals and Fractional Calculus in Continuum Mechanics, pp. 223–276. Springer, Wien (1997)

Inizan, P: Homogeneous fractional embeddings. J. Math. Phys.. 49, (2008) Article ID 082901

Challis, L, Sheard, F: The Green of Green function. Phys. Today. 56, 41–46 (2003)