- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Uniqueness results for the Dirichlet problem for higher order elliptic equations in polyhedral angles
Boundary Value Problems volume 2014, Article number: 232 (2014)
Abstract
We consider the Dirichlet boundary value problem for higher order elliptic equations in divergence form with discontinuous coefficients in polyhedral angles. Some uniqueness results are proved.
MSC: 35J30, 35J40.
1 Introduction
The Dirichlet problem for the polyharmonic equation in a bounded domain of has been studied by Sobolev in [1]. Later on, different problems (Dirichlet, Neumann and Riquier problems) for harmonic, biharmonic and meta-harmonic functions have been considered by Vekua in [2] and [3], both in the cases of bounded and unbounded domains of . Successively, many authors studied analogous problems in more general cases and with different methods (see, for instance, [4]–[10], the general survey on this subject [11] and the references quoted therein). In particular, in [10], the author obtains the uniqueness of the solution of the Dirichlet problem,
where denotes the polyharmonic operator of order m, Δ is the Laplace operator and is a polyhedral angle of , defined in Section 2. We explicitly observe that for the above mentioned definition gives the half-space . We note that, due to the tools used in the proof, some restrictions on the dimension n of the space are required.
Our aim, in this paper, is to generalize the uniqueness result of [10]. More precisely, we are concerned with the following Dirichlet problem for a homogeneous equation in divergence form of order 2m:
where the discontinuous coefficients are bounded and measurable functions satisfying the uniform ellipticity condition.
Let us remark that if we take and if the coefficients of the equation are constants , then the left-hand side of the equation in (1.2) is exactly the polyharmonic operator in (1.1).
Our main results consist in two uniqueness theorems obtained for some particular cases of problem (1.2). More precisely, in Section 4 we consider problem (1.2) in the case and in Section 5 we assume that . The main tool in our analysis is a generalization of the Hardy inequality proved by Kondrat’ev and Oleinik in [5] (see Section 3).
2 Notation
Throughout this work we use the following notation:
is the dimension of the considered space;
Greek letters denote n-dimensional multi-indices, for instance , where , ;
is the module of the multi-index α;
is the factorial of the multi-index α;
, ;
, ;
;
for we set ;
for every ,
is the ‘polyhedral angle’ with vertex in the origin;
for the above definition gives the half-space ;
for we denote by .
3 Setting of the problem
We want to consider the following differential equation in divergence form of order 2m, , in certain unbounded domains of , :
where is a given datum and the coefficients are bounded measurable functions satisfying the uniform ellipticity condition, i.e. there exist two positive constants and such that for each nonzero vector one has
Let us mention that if we take in (3.1) and if the coefficients of the equation are constants , then left-hand side of this equation is the polyharmonic operator , where Δ denotes, as usual, the Laplace operator.
For every sufficiently differentiable functions u and v let us set
Definition 3.1
We say that the function u is a generalized solution of (3.1) in with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions if and it satisfies the integral identity
for any and any function , where .
To prove our main results, consisting in two uniqueness theorems, we will essentially use the following generalized Hardy inequality.
Lemma 3.2
(Generalized Hardy inequality)
Let, j, and n be such that. Assume that for a sufficiently smooth function g the following condition is fulfilled in a conewith vertex in the origin of coordinates:
whereis the gradient of the function g. Then there exist two constantssuch that
where the constant K does not depend on the function g. If, in addition, then.
Remark 3.3
The previous lemma, which was proved by Kondrat’ev and Oleinik in [5], holds also if we replace (3.5) with the following inequality:
with , where , , denotes the intersection between the cone V and the open ball of center in the origin and radius R.
This result can be deduced by the proof of Lemma 3.2, with slight modifications. We point out that in this proof it is also well rendered that the constant K does not depend on and .
Remark 3.4
As evidenced in many works about different variants of Hardy or Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg type inequalities (see for instance [5], [12]–[16]), there are always very important restrictions on the dimension of the space n, the order of ‘singularity’ j and the order of the integral norm p.
4 Dirichlet problem for second order elliptic equations
In this section we consider, for , the homogeneous equation (3.1) in the polyhedral angle , , with the homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition, namely
Let us observe that by Definition 3.1 it follows that every generalized solution is such that
Now we prove our first uniqueness result.
Theorem 4.1
Let. Assume that (3.2) is satisfied, with. If u is a generalized solution of problem (4.1), thenin.
Proof
Let be an auxiliary function in defined by
with , and such that there exists a positive constant such that
We note that in order to obtain a cut-off function of the above mentioned type one can consider a classical mollifier and modify it suitably near to and .
Set, for any ,
Note that the function is such that, for any , one has
Let us now consider the function
Clearly, by definition of and as a consequence of our boundary condition, one has . Thus, substituting this function in the integral identity (3.3), we get
Hence, by (3.2) we have
Recalling that for any one has
in view of the boundedness of the coefficients and of (4.4), one gets
where is the constant in (4.4) and . Thus, taking into account the ellipticity of the coefficients, we obtain
with .
Therefore, if we choose and we apply the generalized Hardy inequality (3.6) (with and ) to the second term in the right-hand side of (4.8), we deduce that
where the constant does not depend on the radius R and on the function u (see Remark 3.3).
Now, observe that clearly for any there exists such that and therefore, in view of the definition of , by the former inequality we obtain
Condition (4.2) being satisfied, the right-hand side of (4.9) tends to zero when . Now, since the left-hand side of (4.9) is independent of the radius R, we have, for any ,
This means that the function is a constant and, according to the boundary condition in (4.1), this constant is zero. This concludes our proof. □
Remark 4.2
Note that our proof do not provide any uniqueness result for , since in this case the generalized Hardy inequality in Lemma 3.2 does not apply, as a consequence of our choice of p and j.
5 Dirichlet problem for higher order elliptic equations
Here, we consider the following homogeneous equation of order 2m with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions in the polyhedral angle , :
Note that, again, in view of Definition 3.1 one finds that every generalized solution of problem (5.1) is such that
Theorem 5.1
Letor, with. Assume that (3.2) is satisfied. If u is a generalized solution of problem (5.1), thenin.
Proof
Let us use again the function introduced in the proof of Theorem 4.1.
It is easy to check that
where denotes the derivative of order i of the function Θ and is a polynomial of order .
Moreover, if we assume that there exist some positive constants , such that
then, for , one has
where the constant depends only on α.
Note that function , thus, substituting it in the integral identity (3.3), we deduce
Therefore
From (4.7) and (5.3), arguing as in the proof of Theorem 4.1, we deduce that
with and .
Now, we apply repeatedly the Hardy inequality (3.6) to the single summands of the second term in the right-hand side of (5.4) until the order of the partial derivatives achieves m. Thus, after an appropriate selection of , we get
where the constant is independent of the radius R and of the function u.
Finally, following the same argument used in Theorem 4.1, for any we find such that and therefore, taking into account the definition of , we obtain
In view of condition (5.2), the right-hand side of (5.5) goes to zero when , and, since the left-hand side of (5.5) is independent of R, we have, for any ,
Therefore, the partial derivatives of any order of the solution are equal to zero, thus, as a consequence of the boundary conditions in (5.1), we deduce that in . □
Remark 5.2
Clearly also in this case the repeated application of the Hardy inequality yields the restrictions or , , on the space dimension.
Authors’ information
Sara Monsurrò and Maria Transirico are members of the Gruppo Nazionale per l’Analisi Matematica, la Probabilità e le loro Applicazioni (GNAMPA) of the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM).
References
Sobolev SL: Some Applications of Functional Analysis in Mathematical Physics. Izdat. Leningrad. Gos. Univ., Leningrad; 1950.
Vekua, IN: On metaharmonic functions. Lect. Notes TICMI 14, 62 pp. (2013). Translated from the 1943 Russian original Trav. Inst. Math. Tbilissi 12, 105-174 (1943)
Vekua IN: New Methods for Solving Elliptic Equations. OGIZ, Moscow; 1948.
Cassisa C, Ricci P, Tavkhelidze I: Analogue of Saint-Venant’s principle for the one special type 4-th order elliptic equation and its applications. Appl. Math. Inform. 1999, 4: 11-29.
Kondrat’ev VA, Oleinik OA: Boundary value problems for the system of elasticity theory in unbounded domains. Korn’s inequalities. Usp. Mat. Nauk 1988, 43(5):55-98. (in Russian)
Kozlov V, Maz’ya V: Asymptotics of a singular solution to the Dirichlet problem for an elliptic equation with discontinuous coefficients near the boundary. In Function Spaces, Differential Operators and Nonlinear Analysis. Birkhäuser, Basel; 2003:75-115. (Teistungen, 2001) 10.1007/978-3-0348-8035-0_5
Monsurrò S, Transirico M:A -estimate for weak solutions of elliptic equations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. 2012., 2012: 10.1155/2012/376179
Monsurrò S, Transirico M: Dirichlet problem for divergence form elliptic equations with discontinuous coefficients. Bound. Value Probl. 2012., 2012: 10.1186/1687-2770-2012-67
Monsurrò S, Transirico M:A priori bounds in for solutions of elliptic equations in divergence form. Bull. Sci. Math. 2013, 137: 851-866. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2013.02.002
Tavkhelidze I: On some properties of solutions of polyharmonic equation in polyhedral angles. Georgian Math. J. 2007, 14: 565-580.
Gazzola F, Grunau H, Sweers G: Polyharmonic Boundary Value Problems. Positivity Preserving and Nonlinear Higher Order Elliptic Equations in Bounded Domains. Springer, Berlin; 2010.
Bojarski B, Hajlasz P: Pointwise inequalities for Sobolev functions and some applications. Stud. Math. 1993, 106: 77-92.
Brezis H, Marcus M: Hardy’s inequalities revisited. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa, Cl. Sci. 1997, 25: 217-237. Dedicated to Ennio De Giorgi
Catrina F, Wang ZQ: On the Caffarelli-Kohn-Nirenberg inequalities: sharp constants, existence (and nonexistence), and symmetry of extremal functions. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 2001, 54: 229-258. 10.1002/1097-0312(200102)54:2<229::AID-CPA4>3.0.CO;2-I
Dávila J, Dupaigne L: Hardy-type inequalities. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 2004, 6: 335-365. 10.4171/JEMS/12
Filippas S, Tertikas A, Tidblom J: On the structure of Hardy-Sobolev-Maz’ya inequalities. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 2009, 11: 1165-1185. 10.4171/JEMS/178
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
The authors conceived and wrote this article in collaboration and with same responsibility. All of them read and approved the final manuscript.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Monsurrò, S., Tavkhelidze, I. & Transirico, M. Uniqueness results for the Dirichlet problem for higher order elliptic equations in polyhedral angles. Bound Value Probl 2014, 232 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0232-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13661-014-0232-1