In this paper, we give a Beale-Kato-Majda type criterion of strong solutions to the incompressible ideal MHD equations. Instead of double exponential estimates, we get a single exponential bound on ( ). It can be applied to a system of an ideal viscoelastic flow.
MSC: 35B65, 76W05.
Keywords:MHD equations; ideal viscoelastic flow; Beale-Kato-Majda criterion; single exponential bound
In this paper, we will get the Beale-Kato-Majda type criterion for the breakdown of smooth solutions to the incompressible ideal MHD equations in as follows:
where , , u is the flow velocity, h is the magnetic field, p is the pressure, while and are, respectively, the given initial velocity and initial magnetic field satisfying , .
Using the standard energy method , it is well known that for , , there exists a such that the Cauchy problem (1) has a unique smooth solution on satisfying
Recently, Caflisch et al. extended the well-known result of Beale et al. to the 3D ideal MHD equations. More precisely, they showed that if the smooth solution satisfies the following condition:
then the solution can be extended beyond , namely, for some , . Many authors also considered the blow-up criterion of the ideal MHD equations in other spaces; see [4-6] and references therein. More recently, for the following incompressible Euler equations:
with , Chen and Pavlovic  showed that if the solution u to (4) satisfies
where , and , then the solution u can be extended beyond . The quantity was introduced by Constantin in  (see also the work of Constantin et al.). For the blow-up criterion of incompressible Euler equations, we refer to [7,10] and references therein.
2 Main results
In this short note, we develop these ideas further and establish an analogous blow-up criterion for solutions of the 3D ideal MHD equations (1). More precisely, we can get the following theorem.
Theorem 2.1Let be a solution to (1) in the class (2) for . Assume that
where , , and the definition of as above. Then there exists a finite positive constant independent of andtsuch that
holds for .
Remark 2.1 Using a similar method, we also can get the blow-up criterion result about ideal viscoelastic flow
with , .
Theorem 2.2Let be a solution to (8) in the class (2) for . Assume that is defined as above, and that
where . Then there exists a finite positive constant independent of andtsuch that
holds for .
This system arises in the Oldroyd model for an ideal viscoelastic flow, i.e. a viscoelastic fluid whose elastic properties dominate its behavior. Here represents the local deformation gradient of the fluid. The blow-up criterion of the ideal viscoelastic system can be found in  and references therein.
3 Proof of Theorem 2.1
For the proof of our main result, firstly we give some properties about the gradient of velocity. Recall that the full gradient of the velocity, ∇u, can be decomposed into symmetric and antisymmetric parts,
is called the deformation tensor.
Lemma 3.1For both the symmetric and the antisymmetric parts , of ∇u, the bound
The antisymmetric part satisfies
for any vector . The vorticityωsatisfies the identity
(‘ ’ denotes principal value) where , with . Notably,
where denotes the standard measure on the sphere .
The matrix components of the symmetric part have the form
where are the vector components ofω, and where the integral kernels have the properties
Thus, in particular, is a Calderon-Zygmund operator, for every .
We can also give the following useful lemma to provide an upper bound of singular integral operator for the incompressible Euler equations in .
Lemma 3.2For fixed, and , let be defined as above. Moreover, let ( ) denote the components of the vorticity vector . Then any singular integral operator
for and the constantCindependent ofuandt.
Now we are ready to give a proof of Theorem 2.1, which is based on combining an energy estimate for ideal MHD equations with the estimate of .
For , we recall the definitions of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous Besov norms for ,
where is the Paley-Littlewood projection of f of scale j. We take the Besov norm of and ; then
However, applying the results of Lemma 3.1 and Lemma 3.2 to u and h, and by the definition of , we obtain
Therefore, we get
for . Thus we complete the proof of Theorem 2.1.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The authors declare that the work was realized in collaboration with the same responsibility. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The first author was supported by the Excellent Young Teachers Program of Shanghai, Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20133108120002) and The First-class Discipline of Universities in Shanghai. The research of the third author, who is the corresponding author, was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41204082), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20120162120036), Special Foundation of China Postdoctoral Science (No. 2013T60781) and Mathematics and Interdisciplinary Sciences Project of Central South University. Moreover, the authors are grateful to anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions.
Caflisch, RE, Klapper, I, Steele, G: Remarks on singularities, dimension and energy dissipation for ideal hydrodynamics and MHD. Commun. Math. Phys.. 184, 443–455 (1997). Publisher Full Text
Beale, JT, Kato, T, Majda, AJ: Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Commun. Math. Phys.. 94, 61–66 (1984). Publisher Full Text
Chen, QL, Miao, CX, Zhang, ZF: On the well-posedness of the ideal MHD equations in the Triebel-Lizorkin spaces. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal.. 195, 561–578 (2010). Publisher Full Text
Chen, T, Pavlovic, N: A lower bound on blowup rates for the 3D incompressible Euler equations and a single exponential Beale-Kato-Majda type estimate. Commun. Math. Phys.. 314, 265–280 (2012). Publisher Full Text
Constantin, P: Geometric statistics in turbulence. SIAM Rev.. 36, 73–98 (1994). Publisher Full Text
Constantin, P, Fefferman, C, Majda, AJ: Geometric constraints on potentially singular solutions for the 3-D Euler equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ.. 21, 559–571 (1996). Publisher Full Text
Deng, J, Hou, TY, Yu, X: Improved geometric conditions for non-blowup of the 3D incompressible Euler equation. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ.. 31, 293–306 (2006). Publisher Full Text
Hu, XP, Ryan, H: Blowup criterion for ideal viscoelastic flow. J. Math. Fluid Mech.. 15, 431–437 (2013). Publisher Full Text