Boundary value problems with -Laplacian have received a lot of attention in recent years. They often occur in the study of the -dimensional -Laplacian equation, non-Newtonian fluid theory, and the turbulent flow of gas in porous medium [1–7]. Many works have been carried out to discuss the existence of solutions or positive solutions and multiple solutions for the local or nonlocal boundary value problems.

On the other hand, the study of dynamic equations on time scales goes back to its founder Stefan Hilger [8] and is a new area of still fairly theoretical exploration in mathematics. Motivating the subject is the notion that dynamic equations on time scales can build bridges between continuous and discrete equations. Further, the study of time scales has led to several important applications, for example, in the study of insect population models, neural networks, heat transfer, and epidemic models, we refer to [8–10]. In addition, the study of BVPs on time scales has received a lot of attention in the literature, with the pioneering existence results to be found in [11–16].

However, existence results are not available for dynamic equations on time scales with integral boundary conditions. Motivated by above, we aim at studying the second-order -Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales in the form of

with integral boundary condition

where is positive parameter, for with and , is the delta derivative, is the nabla derivative, is a time scale which is a nonempty closed subset of with the topology and ordering inherited from , 0 and are points in , an interval , with for all , , with , and where .

The main purpose of this paper is to establish some sufficient conditions for the existence of at least three positive solutions for BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) by using Legget-Williams fixed point theorem. This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, some useful lemmas are established. In Section 3, by using Legget-Williams fixed point theorem, we establish sufficient conditions for the existence of at least three positive solutions for BVPs (1.1)-(1.2). An illustrative example is given in Section 4.

In this section, we will first recall some basic definitions and lemmas which are used in what follows.

Definition 2.1 (see [8]).

A time scale is an arbitrary nonempty closed subset of the real set with the topology and ordering inherited from . The forward and backward jump operators and the graininess are defined, respectively, by

The point is called left-dense, left-scattered, right-dense, or right-scattered if , , and or , respectively. Points that are right-dense and left-dense at the same time are called dense. If has a left-scattered maximum , defined ; otherwise, set . If has a right-scattered minimum , defined ; otherwise, set .

Definition 2.2 (see [8]).

For and , then the delta derivative of at the point is defined to be the number (provided it exists) with the property that for each , there is a neighborhood of such that

For and , then the nabla derivative of at the point is defined to be the number (provided it exists) with the property that for each , there is a neighborhood of such that

Definition 2.3 (see [8]).

A function is rd-continuous provided it is continuous at each right-dense point in and has a left-sided limit at each left-dense point in . The set of rd-continuous functions will be denoted by . A function is left-dense continuous (i.e., ld-continuous) if is continuous at each left-dense point in and its right-sided limit exists (finite) at each right-dense point in . The set of left-dense continuous functions will be denoted by .

Definition 2.4 (see [8]).

If , then we define the delta integral by

If , then we define the nabla integral by

Lemma 2.5 (see [8]).

If and , then

If and , then

Let the Banach space

be endowed with the norm , where

and choose a cone defined by

Lemma 2.6.

If , then for all .

Proof.

If , then . It follows that

With and , one obtains

Therefore,

From (2.11)–(2.13), we can get that

So Lemma 2.6 is proved.

Lemma 2.7.

is a solution of BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) if and only if is a solution of the following integral equation:

where

Proof.

First assume is a solution of BVPs (1.1)-(1.2); then we have

That is,

Integrating (2.18) from to , it follows that

Together with (2.19) and , we obtain

Thus,

namely,

Substituting (2.22) into (2.19), we obtain

The proof of sufficiency is complete.

Conversely, assume is a solution of the following integral equation:

It follows that

So . Furthermore, we have

which imply that

The proof of Lemma 2.7 is complete.

Define the operator by

for all . Obviously, for all .

Lemma 2.8.

If , then .

Proof.

It is easily obtained from the second part of the proof in Lemma 2.7. The proof is complete.

Lemma 2.9.

is complete continuous.

Proof.

First, we show that maps bounded set into itself. Assume is a positive constant and . Note that the continuity of guarantees that there is a such that for all . So we get from and that

That is, is uniformly bounded. In addition, notice that

which implies that

which implies that

That is,

So is equicontinuous for any . Using Arzela-Ascoli theorem on time scales [17], we obtain that is relatively compact. In view of Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem on time scales [18], it is easy to prove that is continuous. Hence, is complete continuous. The proof of this lemma is complete.

Let and be nonnegative continuous convex functionals on a pone , a nonnegative continuous concave functional on , and positive numbers with we defined the following convex sets:

and introduce two assumptions with regard to the functionals , as follows:

(H1) there exists such that for all ;

(H2) for any and .

The following fixed point theorem duo to Bai and Ge is crucial in the arguments of our main result.

Lemma 2.10 (see [19]).

Let be Banach space, a cone, and , . Assume that and are nonnegative continuous convex functionals satisfying (H1) and (H2), is a nonnegative continuous concave functional on such that for all , and is a complete continuous operator. Suppose

(C1), for ;

(C2), for ;

(C3) for with .

Then has at least three fixed points with

3. Main Result

In this section, we will give sufficient conditions for the existence of at least three positive solutions to BVPs (1.1)-(1.2).

Theorem 3.1.

Suppose that there are positive numbers , , and with , and such that the following conditions are satisfied.

(H3) for all , where

(H4) for all .

(H5) for all , where

Then BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) have at least three positive solutions.

Proof.

By the definition of the operator and its properties, it suffices to show that the conditions of Lemma 2.10 hold with respect to the operator .

Let the nonnegative continuous convex functionals , and the nonnegative continuous concave functional be defined on the cone by

Then it is easy to see that and (H1)-(H2) hold.

First of all, we show that . In fact, if , then

and assumption (H3) implies that

On the other hand, for , there is ; thus

Therefore, .

In the same way, if , then assumption (H4) implies

As in the argument above, we can get that . Thus, condition (C2) of Lemma 2.10 holds.

To check condition (C1) in Lemma 2.10. Let . We choose for . It is easy to see that

Consequently,

Hence, for , there are

In view of assumption (H5), we have

It follows that

Therefore, for . So condition (C1) in Lemma 2.10 is satisfied.

Finally, we show that (C3) in Lemma 2.10 holds. In fact, for and , we have

Thus by Lemma 2.10 and the assumption that on , BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) have at least three positive solutions. The proof is complete.

Theorem 3.2.

Suppose that there are positive numbers , , and with , , and such that (H3)-(H4) and the following condition are satisfied.

(H6) for all , where

Then BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) have at least three positive solutions.

Proof.

Let the nonnegative continuous convex functionals , be defined on the cone as Theorem 3.1 and the nonnegative continuous concave functional be defined on the cone by

We will show that condition (C1) in Lemma 2.10 holds. Let . We choose for . It is easy to see that

Consequently,

Hence, for , there are

In view of assumption (H6), we have

It follows that

Therefore, for . So condition (C1) in Lemma 2.10 is satisfied. Using a similar proof to Theorem 3.1, the other conditions in Lemma 2.10 are satisfied. By Lemma 2.10, BVPs (1.1)-(1.2) have at least three positive solutions. The proof is complete.

Example 4.1.

Consider the following second-order Laplacian dynamic equations on time scales

with integral boundary condition

where

Then BVPs (4.1)-(4.2) have at least three positive solutions.

Proof.

Take , , , , , and . It follows that

From (4.1)-(4.2), it is easy to obtain

Hence, we have

Moreover, we have

(H3) for all ,

(H4) for all ,

(H5)for all ,

Therefore, conditions (H3)–(H5) in Theorem 3.1 are satisfied. Further, it is easy to verify that the other conditions in Theorem 3.1 hold. By Theorem 3.1, BVPs (4.1)-(4.2) have at least three positive solutions. The proof is complete.